/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 A group of doctors is deciding w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A group of doctors is deciding whether or not to perform an operation. Suppose the null hypothesis, \(H_{0},\) is: the surgical procedure will go well. Which is the error with the greater consequence?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A Type II error has the greater consequence, risking patient safety by proceeding with unsafe surgery.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\), states that the surgical procedure will go well, meaning no problems or complications will arise. The alternative hypothesis, \(H_{1}\), would then be that the surgical procedure will not go well, implying complications or issues might occur.
02

Define Type I and Type II Errors

A Type I error occurs if we reject the null hypothesis \((H_{0})\) when it is actually true. In this context, it means concluding that the surgery will not go well (when in reality it would). A Type II error occurs if we fail to reject the null hypothesis \((H_{0})\) when the alternative hypothesis \((H_{1})\) is true, meaning we conclude the surgery will go well when it actually will not.
03

Analyze the Consequences of Each Error

If a Type I error occurs, a surgery that would have gone well is not performed, potentially depriving the patient of the benefits of a successful procedure. On the other hand, a Type II error means proceeding with surgery that will have complications, possibly endangering the patient鈥檚 health.
04

Determine the Error of Greater Consequence

Given the context where patient safety is a priority, a Type II error (failing to identify a surgery that will not go well) holds greater consequence, as it risks the patient鈥檚 health during a procedure that is likely to have complications.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
In hypothesis testing, a Type I error occurs when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. This is sometimes referred to as a "false positive." It's like sounding the alarm when everything is actually okay. In our surgical example, a Type I error would mean deciding not to proceed with a surgery that would have been successful. Even though the surgery could have gone smoothly, it gets canceled based on an incorrect conclusion.

The implications can vary depending on the situation. In some cases, a Type I error might not be a big deal, but in situations like medical treatments, it can mean missing out on beneficial procedures. Therefore, understanding the risk of Type I errors is crucial so resources are used wisely and patients don't miss out on treatments they actually need.

  • Type I error: Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
  • Example: Canceling a successful surgery.
  • Impact varies with the context.
Type II Error
A Type II error occurs in hypothesis testing when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. This is often called a "false negative." It's akin to assuming everything is fine when there is actually a problem. In the context of the surgical procedure, a Type II error would mean going ahead with a surgery that ultimately has complications.

Such errors can have bigger consequences compared to Type I errors, especially in high-stakes situations like medicine where patient safety is of utmost importance. Performing a surgery that results in complications not only risks the health of the patient but also leads to additional treatments and possibly longer recovery times. This could have both health and financial implications for the patient.

  • Type II error: Not rejecting a false null hypothesis.
  • Example: Proceeding with problematic surgery.
  • Bigger impact in critical situations.
Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis represents a default position or statement that there is no effect or no difference. It is often what you are trying to test against with your alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is symbolized as \(H_0\).

In our example, the null hypothesis states that "the surgical procedure will go well," presuming all will be fine during the operation. It's like a baseline statement that there should be no issues. Investigating whether to reject this premise is the essence of hypothesis testing. By gathering evidence, you determine whether the null hypothesis holds or if the alternative hypothesis 鈥 that complications might occur 鈥 is more likely true.

Understanding the null hypothesis is critical as it guides what evidence needs to be collected and how decisions will be made based on data, impacting both clinical outcomes and decision-making processes.

  • Null Hypothesis: Assumes no effect or complication.
  • Example in surgery: Procedure will go well.
  • Guides the focus of evidence collection.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Japanese Girls鈥 Names" by Kumi Furuichi It used to be very typical for Japanese girls鈥 names to end with 鈥渒o.鈥 (The trend might have started around my grandmothers鈥 generation and its peak might have been around my mother鈥檚 generation.) 鈥淜o鈥 means 鈥渃hild鈥 in Chinese characters. Parents would name their daughters with 鈥渒o鈥 attaching to other Chinese characters which have meanings that they want their daughters to become, such as Sachiko鈥攈appy child, Yoshiko鈥攁 good child, Yasuko鈥攁 healthy child, and so on. However, I noticed recently that only two out of nine of my Japanese girlfriends at this school have names which end with 鈥渒o.鈥 More and more, parents seem to have become creative, modernized, and, sometimes, westernized in naming their children. I have a feeling that, while 70 percent or more of my mother鈥檚 generation would have names with 鈥渒o鈥 at the end, the proportion has dropped among my peers. I wrote down all my Japanese friends鈥, ex-classmates鈥, co-workers, and acquaintances鈥 names that I could remember. Following are the names. (Some are repeats.) Test to see if the proportion has dropped for this generation. Ai, Akemi, Akiko, Ayumi, Chiaki, Chie, Eiko, Eri, Eriko, Fumiko, Harumi, Hitomi, Hiroko, Hiroko, Hidemi, Hisako, Hinako, Izumi, Izumi, Junko, Junko, Kana, Kanako, Kanayo, Kayo, Kayoko, Kazumi, Keiko, Keiko, Kei, Kumi, Kumiko, Kyoko, Kyoko, Madoka, Maho, Mai, Maiko, Maki, Miki, Miki, Mikiko, Mina, Minako, Miyako, Momoko, Nana, Naoko, Naoko, Naoko, Noriko, Rieko, Rika, Rika, Rumiko, Rei, Reiko, Reiko, Sachiko, Sachiko, Sachiyo, Saki, Sayaka, Sayoko, Sayuri, Seiko, Shiho, Shizuka, Sumiko, Takako, Takako, Tomoe, Tomoe, Tomoko, Touko, Yasuko, Yasuko, Yasuyo, Yoko, Yoko, Yoko, Yoshiko, Yoshiko, Yoshiko, Yuka, Yuki, Yuki, Yukiko, Yuko, Yuko.

Draw the general graph of a left-tailed test.

The mean work week for engineers in a start-up company is believed to be about 60 hours. A newly hired engineer hopes that it's shorter. She asks ten engineering friends in start-ups for the lengths of their mean work weeks. Based on the results that follow, should she count on the mean work week to be shorter than 60 hours? Data (length of mean work week): 70; 45; 55; 60; 65; 55; 55; 60; 50; 55.

A poll done for Newsweek found that 13% of Americans have seen or sensed the presence of an angel. A contingent doubts that the percent is really that high. It conducts its own survey. Out of 76 Americans surveyed, only two had seen or sensed the presence of an angel. As a result of the contingent鈥檚 survey, would you agree with the Newsweek poll? In complete sentences, also give three reasons why the two polls might give different results.

Previously, an organization reported that teenagers spent 4.5 hours per week, on average, on the phone. The organization thinks that, currently, the mean is higher. Fifteen randomly chosen teenagers were asked how many hours per week they spend on the phone. The sample mean was 4.75 hours with a sample standard deviation of 2.0. Conduct a hypothesis test. At a significance level of \(a=0.05,\) what is the correct conclusion? a. There is enough evidence to conclude that the mumber of hours is more than 4.75 b. There is enough evidence to conclude that the mean number of hore than 4.5 c. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mumber of hours is more than 4.5 d. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean number of hours is more than 4.75

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.