/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 59 The paper "The Shelf Life of Bir... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "The Shelf Life of Bird Eggs: Testing Egg Viability Using a Tropical Climate Gradient" (Ecology [2005]: 2164-2175) investigated the effect of altitude and length of exposure on the hatch rate of thrasher eggs. Data consistent with the estimated probabilities of hatching after a number of days of exposure given in the paper are shown here. Probability of Hatching Exposure (days) \(\quad\)\begin{tabular}{cccccccc} 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline Proportion (lowland) & \(0.81\) & \(0.83\) & \(0.68\) & \(0.42\) & \(0.13\) & \(0.07\) & \(0.04\) & \(0.02\) \\ Proportion (mid-elevation) & \(0.49\) & \(0.24\) & \(0.14\) & \(0.037\) & \(0.040\) & \(0.024\) & \(0.030\) \\ \\\ Proportion \(0.75\) (cloud forest) & \(0.67\) & \(0.36\) & \(0.31\) & \(0.14\) & \(0.09\) & \(0.06\) & \(0.07\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Plot the data for the low- and mid-elevation experimental treatments versus exposure. Are the plots generally the shape you would expect from "logistic" plots? b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the exposure times in the cloud forest and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b(\) Days \()\). What is the significance of a a negative slope to this line? c. Using your best-fit line from Part (b), what would you estimate the proportion of eggs that would, on average, hatch if they were exposed to cloud forest conditions for 3 days? 5 days? . d. At what point in time does the estimated proportion of hatching for cloud forest conditions seem to cross from greater than \(0.5\) to less than \(0.5\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The graphical representation of proportion values against exposure times for lowland and mid-elevation experiments will reveal logistical trends, albeit with some exceptions due to natural variance. From the logistic regression for the cloud forest condition, a negative slope implies the hatch rate drops with increased exposure time. Predicting the hatch rate for 3 and 5 days would require substituting these values into the best-fit line and transforming the outcome into a proportion via the logistic function. As for when the hatching proportion becomes less than 0.5 from greater than 0.5, it would be identifiable as the point the line intersects y = 0.5.

Step by step solution

01

Plotting the data

First, plot the proportion values for both lowland and mid-elevation against the exposure time. To determine if they are 'logistic' plots, observe if the graphs have the typical 'S' shape of a logistic function, with the values rapidly increasing/decreasing before slowly tapering off.
02

Logistic regression

Next, calculate \(y'\) using the formula \(y'=\ln(\frac{p}{1-p})\) for each exposure time in the cloud forest. Use these values to fit the line \(y'=a+b(\text{Days})\), where a and b are the intercept and slope of the line, respectively. The slope (b) indicates the rate of change of hatch rate with respect to exposure time. A negative slope means that the hatch rate decreases as exposure time increases.
03

Estimating proportions

To estimate the proportion of eggs that would hatch if exposed to cloud forest conditions for 3 and 5 days, substitute these values in the best-fit line equation obtained from the previous step, then convert the \(y'\) values back to proportions using the inverse of the earlier function \(p = \frac{e^{y'}}{1+e^{y'}}\).
04

Identifying the turning point

To find when the estimated proportion changes from above 0.5 to below 0.5, observe the point in the graph where the line crosses the y=0.5 line.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability of Hatching
In logistic regression, the probability of an event happening is estimated using the logistic function. For this exercise, the event is the hatching of eggs. The probability of hatching changes with factors like altitude and exposure time. During longer exposures, the probability can decrease significantly.

Let's say at lower elevations, eggs have a higher probability of hatching initially, but over time, exposure causes it to drop. This probability is usually represented as values between 0 and 1. Each proportion given represents the likelihood of eggs hatching at a specific time under certain conditions. By monitoring these probabilities, researchers can make predictions about egg viability in different environments.
Logistic Plots
A logistic plot visually represents how probabilities change over time. These plots can reveal key patterns and trends, like an 'S' shape, typically seen in logistic functions.

In our exercise, plotting the proportion of hatching eggs against exposure time helps see if the data follows this 'S' shape pattern. Initially, the probability might rise or remain stable, but as exposure time increases, it may decrease and eventually plateau.
  • Rapid initial changes could suggest a high sensitivity to initial conditions.
  • Later plateaus indicate stabilization, where further exposure doesn't significantly alter the probability.
Observing how the curves behave helps understand the dynamics of egg hatching across different elevations.
Slope Significance
In logistic regression, the slope of the line is crucial. It shows how quickly the probability of the event—the hatching—changes over time.

When analyzing the cloud forest data, a negative slope suggests that as exposure days increase, the probability of hatching decreases. This is meaningful for researchers as it highlights environmental stressors affecting egg viability.

Understanding slope significance helps make:
  • Quick assessments about viability trends.
  • Informed decisions about environmental interventions needed to improve conditions for hatching.
Recognizing this trend is key in predicting how similar conditions might affect other species or in different settings.
Proportion Estimation
Proportion estimation helps find out the expected fraction of eggs likely to hatch under specific conditions or after a certain time.

Using the logistic regression line, we can estimate proportions for days not directly measured.

To calculate these proportions: 1. Plug the number of days into the logistic regression equation to find the log-odds. 2. Convert the log-odds to a probability using the inverse logistic function.
  • This method provides an average estimate.
  • Helps in planning conservation strategies.
By evaluating proportion estimations, researchers can predict the point where conditions become unfavorable, allowing timely actions to preserve egg viability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\), are used to assess the fit of a line. a. Is it possible that both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set? Explain. (A picture might be helpful.) b. Is it possible that a bivariate data set could yield values of \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) that are both small? Explain. (Again, a picture might be helpful.) c. Explain why it is desirable to have \(r^{2}\) large and \(s_{s}\) small if the relationship between two variables \(x\) and \(\gamma\) is to be described using a straight line.

It may seem odd, but one of the ways biologists can tell how old a lobster is involves measuring the concentration of a pigment called neurolipofuscin in the eyestalk of a lobster. (We are not making this up!) The authors of the paper "Neurolipofusdin is a Measure of Age in Panulirus argus, the Caribbean Spiny Lobster. in Florida" (Biological Bulletin [2007]: \(55-66\) ) wondered if it was sufficient to measure the pigment in just one eye stalk, which would be the case if there is a strong relationship between the concentration in the right and left eyestalks. Pigment concentration (as a percentage of tissue sample) was measured in both eyestalks for 39 lobsters, resulting is the following summary quantities (based on data read from a graph that appeared in the paper): $$ \begin{aligned} n &=39 & \sum x &=88.8 & & \Sigma y &=86.1 \\ \Sigma x y &=281.1 & \sum x^{2} &=288.0 & & \Sigma y^{2}=286.6 \end{aligned} $$ An alternative formula for computing the correlation coefficient that is based on raw data and is algebraically equivalent to the one given in the text is $$ r=\frac{\sum x y-\frac{\left(\sum x\right)(\Sigma y)}{n}}{\sqrt{\sum x^{2}-\frac{\left(\sum x\right)^{2}}{n}} \sqrt{\sum y^{2}-\frac{\left(\sum y\right)^{2}}{n}}} $$ Use this formula to compute the value of the correlation coefficient, and interpret this value.

The paper "Effects of Canine Parvovirus (CPV) on Gray Wolves in Minnesota" (journal of Wildlife Management [1995]: \(565-570\) ) summarized a regression of \(y=\) percentage of pups in a capture on \(x=\) percentage of CPV prevalence among adults and pups. The equation of the least-squares line, based on \(n=10\) observations, was \(\hat{y}=62.9476-0.54975 x\), with \(r^{2}=.57\). a. One observation was \((25,70)\). What is the corresponding residual? b. What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? c. Suppose that \(\mathrm{SSTo}=2520.0\) (this value was not given in the paper). What is the value of \(s_{e}\) ?

\(5.19\) - The accompanying data on \(x=\) head circumference \(z\) score (a comparison score with peers of the same age - a positive score suggests a larger size than for peers) at age 6 to 14 months and \(y=\) volume of cerebral grey matter (in \(\mathrm{ml}\) ) at age 2 to 5 years were read from a graph in the article described in the chapter introduction (journal of the American Medical Association [2003]). \begin{tabular}{lc} Cerebral Grey Matter (ml) \(2-5\) yr & Head Circumference \(z\) Scores at \(6-14\) Months \\ \hline 680 & \(-.75\) \\ 690 & \(1.2\) \\ 700 & \(-.3\) \\ 720 & \(.25\) \\ 740 & \(.3\) \\ 740 & \(1.5\) \\ 750 & \(1.1\) \\ 750 & \(2.0\) \\ 760 & \(1.1\) \\ 780 & \(1.1\) \\ 790 & \(2.0\) \\ 810 & \(2.1\) \\ 815 & \(2.8\) \\ 820 & \(2.2\) \\ 825 & \(.9\) \\ 835 & \(2.35\) \\ 840 & \(2.3\) \\ 845 & \(2.2\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot for these data. b. What is the value of the correlation coefficient? c. Find the equation of the least-squares line. d. Predict the volume of cerebral grey matter at age 2 to 5 years for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score at age 12 months was \(1.8\). e. Explain why it would not be a good idea to use the least-squares line to predict the volume of grey matter for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score was \(3.0\).

As part of a study of the effects of timber management strategies (Ecological Applications [2003]: IIIOII123) investigators used satellite imagery to study abundance of the lichen Lobaria oregano at different elevations. Abundance of a species was classified as "common" if there were more than 10 individuals in a plot of land. In the table below, approximate proportions of plots in which Lobaria oregano were common are given. Proportions of Plots Where Lobaria oregano Are Common \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrr} \hline Elevation (m) & 400 & 600 & 800 & 1000 & 1200 & 1400 & 1600 \\ Prop. of plots & \(0.99\) & \(0.96\) & \(0.75\) & \(0.29\) & \(0.077\) & \(0.035\) & \(0.01\) \\ with lichen & & & & \end{tabular} with lichen \begin{tabular}{l} with lichen \\ common \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. As elevation increases, does the proportion of plots for which lichen is common become larger or smaller? What aspect(s) of the table support your answer? b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the elevations and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b(\) Elevation). What is the equation of the best-fit line? c. Using the best-fit line from Part (b), estimate the proportion of plots of land on which Lobaria oregano are classified as "common" at an elevation of \(900 \mathrm{~m} .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.