/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 58 Some plant viruses are spread by... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Some plant viruses are spread by insects and tend to spread from the edges of a field inward. The data on \(x=\) distance from the edge of the field (in meters) and \(y=\) proportion of plants with virus symptoms that appeared in the paper "Pattems of Spread of Two NonPersistently Aphid-Borne Viruses in Lupin Stands" (Annals of Applied Biology [2005]: \(337-350\) ) was used to fit a least-squares regression line to describe the relationship between \(x\) and \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right) .\) Minitab output resulting from fitting the least-squares line is given below. The regression equation is \(\ln (p /(1-p))=-0.917-0.107\) Distance to Crop Edge Predictor Predictor Constant Constant Distance to Crop Edge \(\mathrm{S}=0.387646 \quad \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=72.8 \% \quad \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{ad} j)=72.1 \%\) a. What is the logistic regression function relating \(x\) and the proportion of plants with virus symptoms? b. What would you predict for the proportion of plants with virus symptoms at a distance of 15 meters from the edge of the field? (Note: the \(x\) values in the data set ranged from 0 to \(20 .\) )

Short Answer

Expert verified
The logistic regression function is given by \(p(x) = \frac{e^{-0.917 - 0.107x}}{1+e^{-0.917 - 0.107x}}\). The proportion of plants with a virus at a distance of 15 meters from the edge of the field can be found by substituting \(x = 15\) into the logistic regression formula and calculating the result. The precise value will be given after the calculation.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the Logistic Regression Function

From the information given, the equation can be written as \(y'= ln(\frac{p}{1-p}) = -0.917 - 0.107x\). Now, solve the equation to express \(p\) in function of \(x\). Firstly, do this by getting rid of the natural logarithm using the property that \(e^{ln(x)} = x\), so \(\frac{p}{1-p} = e^{-0.917 - 0.107x}\). Solving this for \(p\), gives the logistic regression function \(p(x) = \frac{e^{-0.917 - 0.107x}}{1+e^{-0.917 - 0.107x}}\).
02

Predicting Plant Virus Symptoms

The next step is to substitute \(x = 15\) into the logistic regression function to get the proportion of plants with virus symptoms at a distance of 15 meters from the edge of the field. \(p(15) = \frac{e^{-0.917 - 0.107(15)}}{1+e^{-0.917 - 0.107(15)}}\). Calculate the value to get the required proportion.
03

Calculating the Proportion

After substituting \(x = 15\) into the function and calculating, the result will provide the proportion of plants with virus symptoms at the specified distance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Least-squares Regression Line
The least-squares regression line is a statistical method used to model the relationship between a response variable and one or more explanatory variables. Its goal is to minimize the sum of the squares of the differences between the observed responses in a dataset and those predicted by the linear approximation.

In the context of our exercise, this line is used to describe the relationship between the distance from the edge of a field (explanatory variable, denoted as 'x') and the transformed proportion of plants with virus symptoms (response variable, denoted as 'y prime'). The transformation, in this case, makes use of the natural logarithm of the odds ratio of the proportion, allowing for a linear relationship to be fit by the least-squares method.

Understanding the least-squares regression line is vital for predicting outcomes. For example, agricultural scientists use this model to predict the spread of plant viruses, which can help in developing strategies for disease control and crop management.
Proportion of Plants with Virus Symptoms
When studying the spread of viruses among plant populations, researchers often examine the proportion of plants displaying symptoms of infection. This proportion represents the likelihood or the rate at which the plants in a certain area (like near the edge of a field) are affected by viruses.

In logistic regression, the proportion is typically transformed using the logit function, which is the natural logarithm of the odds ratio \(\ln(p/(1-p))\). This transformation linearizes the relationship between the explanatory and response variables, which enables the application of linear regression techniques.

Tracking the proportion of plants with virus symptoms is crucial because it informs farmers and agricultural researchers about the severity of an outbreak. By understanding these proportions, effective measures can be implemented to reduce the virus spread, ultimately safeguarding the crops.
Minitab Statistical Software
Minitab is a powerful statistical software widely used for data analysis across various disciplines, including engineering, research, and education. It offers a suite of tools to perform complex statistical analyses with a user-friendly interface, making it accessible to professionals and students alike.

For studies involving logistic regression, such as the one in our exercise, Minitab provides functionalities to fit a model, check its adequacy, and even predict response variables for given sets of explanatory variables. The software simplifies the analysis process and presents results succinctly, like the output included in our problem, which details the regression equation, standard error, and coefficients of determination (R-squared values).

Learning to use statistical software like Minitab is crucial for students and researchers in fields that rely on statistical analysis as it enhances their ability to interpret and present data effectively.
Natural Logarithm Transformation
Natural logarithm transformation is a mathematical technique used to transform nonlinear data into a linear form. In statistical analysis, particularly logistic regression, the natural log transformation of the odds ratio, \(\ln(p/(1-p))\), is commonly used. This logit transformation linearizes the relationship between variables, allowing for the use of linear regression techniques on binary response data.

The transformation handles data that represent proportions or probabilities, which are constrained to values between 0 and 1. By applying the natural logarithm transformation, we can work with values ranging from \( -\infty \) to \( \infty \), making the data more amenable to linear modeling.

Understanding the natural logarithm transformation is essential in fields like epidemiology, economics, and biology, as it enables analysts to model and make sense of growth patterns, rates of infection, and other phenomena that exhibit exponential characteristics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The data given in the previous exercise on \(x=\) call-to-shock time (in minutes) and \(y=\) survival rate (percent) were used to compute the equation of the leastsquares line, which was $$ \hat{y}=101.33-9.30 x $$ The newspaper article "FDA OKs Use of Home Defibrillators" (San Luis Obispo Tribune. November \(13 .\) 2002) reported that "every minute spent waiting for paramedics to arrive with a defibrillator lowers the chance of survival by 10 percent." Is this statement consistent with the given least-squares line? Explain.

A study was carried out to investigate the relationship between the hardness of molded plastic \((y\), in Brinell units) and the amount of time elapsed since termination of the molding process \((x\), in hours). Summary quantities include \(n=15\), SSResid \(=1235.470\), and SSTo \(=25,321.368\). Calculate and interpret the coefficient of determination.

The hypothetical data below are from a toxicity study designed to measure the effectiveness of different doses of a pesticide on mosquitoes. The table below summarizes the concentration of the pesticide, the sample sizes, and the number of critters dispatched. \begin{tabular}{lccccccc} \hline Concentration (g/cc) & \(0.10\) & \(0.15\) & \(0.20\) & \(0.30\) & \(0.50\) & \(0.70\) & \(0.95\) \\ Number of mosquitoes & 48 & 52 & 56 & 51 & 47 & 53 & 51 \\ Number killed & 10 & 13 & 25 & 31 & 39 & 51 & 49 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Make a scatterplot of the proportions of mosquitoes killed versus the pesticide concentration. b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the concentrations and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b\) (Concentration). What is the significance of a positive slope for this line? c. The point at which the dose kills \(50 \%\) of the pests is sometimes called LD50, for "Lethal dose \(50 \%\)." What would you estimate to be LD50 for this pesti-

An article on the cost of housing in California that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (March 30 . 2001) included the following statement: "In Northern California, people from the San Francisco Bay area pushed into the Central Valley, benefiting from home prices that dropped on average \(\$ 4000\) for every mile traveled east of the Bay area." If this statement is correct, what is the slope of the least- squares regression line, \(\hat{y}=a+b x\), where \(y=\) house price (in dollars) and \(x=\) distance east of the Bay (in miles)? Explain.

\(5.19\) - The accompanying data on \(x=\) head circumference \(z\) score (a comparison score with peers of the same age - a positive score suggests a larger size than for peers) at age 6 to 14 months and \(y=\) volume of cerebral grey matter (in \(\mathrm{ml}\) ) at age 2 to 5 years were read from a graph in the article described in the chapter introduction (journal of the American Medical Association [2003]). \begin{tabular}{lc} Cerebral Grey Matter (ml) \(2-5\) yr & Head Circumference \(z\) Scores at \(6-14\) Months \\ \hline 680 & \(-.75\) \\ 690 & \(1.2\) \\ 700 & \(-.3\) \\ 720 & \(.25\) \\ 740 & \(.3\) \\ 740 & \(1.5\) \\ 750 & \(1.1\) \\ 750 & \(2.0\) \\ 760 & \(1.1\) \\ 780 & \(1.1\) \\ 790 & \(2.0\) \\ 810 & \(2.1\) \\ 815 & \(2.8\) \\ 820 & \(2.2\) \\ 825 & \(.9\) \\ 835 & \(2.35\) \\ 840 & \(2.3\) \\ 845 & \(2.2\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot for these data. b. What is the value of the correlation coefficient? c. Find the equation of the least-squares line. d. Predict the volume of cerebral grey matter at age 2 to 5 years for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score at age 12 months was \(1.8\). e. Explain why it would not be a good idea to use the least-squares line to predict the volume of grey matter for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score was \(3.0\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.