/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\), are us... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 5: Problem 42

Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\), are used to assess the fit of a line. a. Is it possible that both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set? Explain. (A picture might be helpful.) b. Is it possible that a bivariate data set could yield values of \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) that are both small? Explain. (Again, a picture might be helpful.) c. Explain why it is desirable to have \(r^{2}\) large and \(s_{s}\) small if the relationship between two variables \(x\) and \(\gamma\) is to be described using a straight line.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Yes, both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) can be large when data points are dispersed but follow a clear overall trend. b. Yes, both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) can be small when data points are tightly clustered around a line that doesn't explain much of the overall variance. c. It is desirable to have large \(r^{2}\) and small \(s\) when describing the relationship between two variables using a straight line because this indicates high goodness of fit and high prediction accuracy.

Step by step solution

01

- Scenario when both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) could be large

Yes, it is possible for both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) to be large for a bivariate data set. An example scenario happens when the data points are very dispersed from the regression line but follow a clear overall trend. This means that the line explains a good amount of overall trend (hence large \(r^{2}\)), but the individual data points can still be far from the line (signifying large \(s\)).
02

- Scenario when both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) could be small

Yes, both \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) can be small for a bivariate data set. This can occur when the data points are clustered tightly around a line but that line doesn't tend to explain much of the overall variance. That means although the line has a low \(r^{2}\) value as it doesn't explain a large proportion of the variance in the data, the individual data points are still close to it (low \(s\)).
03

- Ideal scenario for straight line fit

To describe the relationship between two variables using a straight line, it is desirable to have \(r^{2}\) large and \(s\) small. A large \(r^{2}\) means that the line explains a large proportion of the variance in the data, indicating a high goodness of fit. On the other hand, a small \(s\) means that individual data points are close to the line, indicating that the line predicts the values well. Thus, a model with large \(r^{2}\) and small \(s\) will likely be a good fit for the data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Goodness of Fit
Understanding the goodness of fit is crucial when analyzing bivariate data to determine how well a model, such as a regression line, represents the data points.

The concept involves measuring how closely the data points cluster around the model, which, in the context of a regression line, means how well the line captures the pattern in the data. When the goodness of fit is high, the model is more reliable and provides more accurate predictions. Tools used to assess the goodness of fit include the coefficient of determination, known as r-squared (r^2), and the standard error of the estimate (s).

A high value of r-squared indicates that a large percentage of the variance in the dependent variable is explained by the model, while a small standard error indicates the data points are close to the regression line, suggesting less dispersion and higher precision in predictions.
Regression Line
A regression line is the straight line in a scatterplot that provides the best approximation of the relationship between two variables.

It is the visual representation of the regression equation and passes through the 'center' of the data points. When drawn on a scatterplot, the regression line should minimizes the distances between itself and every data point 鈥� these distances represent prediction errors. The slope of the regression line indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables. If the regression line accurately captures the underlying trend in the data, this is seen as a successful portrayal of the relationship and it is considered to have a good goodness of fit.
Variance Explanation
The term variance explanation is associated with understanding how much of the variability in the response variable can be explained by its relationship with the predictor variable.

This concept is crucial in regression analysis where the goal is to determine how well a model, such as a regression line, explains the variance observed in the data set. The r-squared (r^2) value is the statistical measure that quantifies the extent of variance explanation. A high r-squared value suggests that the model explains a high proportion of the variability, which is an indicator of a strong relationship between the variables.
R-Squared (r^2)
The r-squared (r^2) statistic is one of the most informative measures used in bivariate data analysis.

Representing the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable or variables in a regression model, r-squared values range from 0 to 1. An r-squared close to 1 indicates that the regression line almost perfectly fits the data. Conversely, an r-squared near 0 suggests that the model fails to capture the data's variability. This statistic is useful for comparing the explanatory power of regression models, as a higher r-squared represents a more precise fit to the observed data.
Standard Error of Estimate (s)
The standard error of the estimate (s) reflects the average distance that the observed data points deviate from the regression line.

It's a measure of the precision of the predictions made by the regression line and is obtained by taking the square root of the mean square error from the regression analysis. A smaller value for the standard error indicates that the data points tend to be closer to the regression line, suggesting that the line is an accurate predictor of the dependent variable. In context of the exercise, we strive for a small standard error, which, alongside a high r-squared, points to a robust model with a tight fit to the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table gives the number of organ transplants performed in the United States each year from 1990 to 1999 (The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, 2003 ): \begin{tabular}{cc} Year & Number of Transplants (in thousands) \\ \hline 1 (1990) & \(15.0\) \\ 2 & \(15.7\) \\ 3 & \(16.1\) \\ 4 & \(17.6\) \\ 5 & \(18.3\) \\ 6 & \(19.4\) \\ 7 & \(20.0\) \\ 8 & \(20.3\) \\ 9 & \(21.4\) \\ 10 (1999) & \(21.8\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot of these data, and then find the equation of the least-squares regression line that describes the relationship between \(y=\) number of transplants performed and \(x=\) year. Describe how the number of transplants performed has changed over time from 1990 to \(1999 .\) b. Compute the 10 residuals, and construct a residual plot. Are there any features of the residual plot that indicate that the relationship between year and number of transplants performed would be better described by a curve rather than a line? Explain.

The article "Reduction in Soluble Protein and Chlorophyll Contents in a few Plants as Indicators of Automobile Exhaust Pollution" (International journal of Environmental Studies [19831: \(239-244\) ) reported the following data on \(x=\) distance from a highway (in meters) and \(y=\) lead content of soil at that distance (in parts per million): \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrr}x & 0.3 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 15 & 20 \\ y & 62.75 & 37.51 & 29.70 & 20.71 & 17.65 & 15.41 \\ x & 25 & 30 & 40 & 50 & 75 & 100 \\ y & 14.15 & 13.50 & 12.11 & 11.40 & 10.85 & 10.85\end{array}\) a. Use a statistical computer package to construct scatterplots of \(y\) versus \(x, y\) versus \(\log (x), \log (y)\) versus \(\log (x)\), and \(\frac{1}{y}\) versus \(\frac{1}{x}\) b. Which transformation considered in Part (a) does the best job of producing an approximately linear relationship? Use the selected transformation to predict lead content when distance is \(25 \mathrm{~m}\).

As part of a study of the effects of timber management strategies (Ecological Applications [2003]: IIIOII123) investigators used satellite imagery to study abundance of the lichen Lobaria oregano at different elevations. Abundance of a species was classified as "common" if there were more than 10 individuals in a plot of land. In the table below, approximate proportions of plots in which Lobaria oregano were common are given. Proportions of Plots Where Lobaria oregano Are Common \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrr} \hline Elevation (m) & 400 & 600 & 800 & 1000 & 1200 & 1400 & 1600 \\ Prop. of plots & \(0.99\) & \(0.96\) & \(0.75\) & \(0.29\) & \(0.077\) & \(0.035\) & \(0.01\) \\ with lichen & & & & \end{tabular} with lichen \begin{tabular}{l} with lichen \\ common \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. As elevation increases, does the proportion of plots for which lichen is common become larger or smaller? What aspect(s) of the table support your answer? b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the elevations and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b(\) Elevation). What is the equation of the best-fit line? c. Using the best-fit line from Part (b), estimate the proportion of plots of land on which Lobaria oregano are classified as "common" at an elevation of \(900 \mathrm{~m} .\)

Anabolic steroid abuse has been increasing despite increased press reports of adverse medical and psychiatric consequences. In a recent study, medical researchers studied the potential for addiction to testosterone in hamsters (Neuroscience \([2004]: 971-981)\). Hamsters were allowed to self-administer testosterone over a period of days, resulting in the death of some of the animals. The data below show the proportion of hamsters surviving versus the peak self-administration of testosterone \((\mu \mathrm{g}) .\) Fit a logistic regression equation and use the equation to predict the probability of survival for a hamster with a peak intake of \(40 \mu \mathrm{g}\). \begin{tabular}{cccc} \multicolumn{4}{c} { Survival } \\ Peak Intake (micrograms) & Proportion \((p)\) & \(\frac{p}{1-p}\) & \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) \\ \hline 10 & \(0.980\) & \(49.0000\) & \(3.8918\) \\ 30 & \(0.900\) & \(9.0000\) & \(2.1972\) \\ 50 & \(0.880\) & \(7.3333\) & \(1.9924\) \\ 70 & \(0.500\) & \(1.0000\) & \(0.0000\) \\ 90 & \(0.170\) & \(0.2048\) & \(-1.5856\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}

The paper "Commercially Available Plant Growth Regulators and Promoters Modify Bulk Tissue Abscisic Acid Concentrations in Spring Barley, but not Root Growth and Yield Response to Drought" Applied Biology [2006]: 291-304) describes a study of the drought response of barley. The accompanying data on \(x\) \(=\) days after sowing and \(y=\) soil moisture deficit (in \(\mathrm{mm}\) ) was read from a graph that appeared in the paper. \begin{tabular}{cc} Days After Sowing & Soil Moisture Defidt \\ \hline 37 & \(0.00\) \\ 63 & \(69.36\) \\ 68 & \(79.15\) \\ 75 & \(85.11\) \\ 82 & \(93.19\) \\ 98 & \(104.26\) \\ 104 & \(108.94\) \\ 111 & \(112.34\) \\ 132 & \(115.74\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot of \(y=\) soil moisture deficit versus \(x=\) days after sowing. Does the relationship between these two variables appear to be linear or nonlinear? b. Fit a least-squares line to the given data and construct a residual plot. Does the residual plot support your conclusion in Part (a)? Explain. c. Consider transforming the data by leaving \(y\) un- changed and using either \(x^{\prime}=\sqrt{x}\) or \(x^{\prime \prime}=\frac{1}{x}\) Which of these transformations would you recommend? Justify your choice using appropriate graphical displays. d. Using the transformation you recommend in Part (c), find the equation of the least-squares line that describes the relationship between \(y\) and the transformed \(x\). e. What would you predict for soil moisture deficit 50 days after sowing? For 100 days after sowing? f. Explain why it would not be reasonable to predict soil moisture deficit 200 days after sowing.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.