/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Cost-to-charge ratio (the percen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Cost-to-charge ratio (the percentage of the amount billed that represents the actual cost) for inpatient and outpatient services at 11 Oregon hospitals is shown in the following table (Oregon Department of Health Services, 2002 ). A scatterplot of the data is also shown. \begin{tabular}{ccc} & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Cost-to-Charge Ratio } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Hospital & Outpatient Care & Inpatient Care \\ \hline 1 & 62 & 80 \\ 2 & 66 & 76 \\ 3 & 63 & 75 \\ 4 & 51 & 62 \\ 5 & 75 & 100 \\ 6 & 65 & 88 \\ 7 & 56 & 64 \\ 8 & 45 & 50 \\ 9 & 48 & 54 \\ 10 & 71 & 83 \\ 11 & 54 & 100 \\ \hline \end{tabular} The least-squares regression line with \(y=\) inpatient costto-charge ratio and \(x=\) outpatient cost-to-charge ratio is \(\hat{y}=-1.1+1.29 x\). a. Is the observation for Hospital 11 an influential observation? Justify your answer. b. Is the observation for Hospital 11 an outlier? Explain. c. Is the observation for Hospital 5 an influential observation? Justify your answer. d. Is the observation for Hospital 5 an outlier? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Yes, the observation for Hospital 11 is an influential observation because its removal would significantly change the regression line. b. Yes, the observation for Hospital 11 is an outlier because its residual is much greater than most of the other residuals. c. The influence of Hospital 5 depends on the change in regression coefficients when it is removed, which is not calculated here. d. No, the observation for Hospital 5 is not an outlier as its residual is not exceptionally large compared to other data points.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate predicted values

Using the regression equation \(\hat{y} = -1.1 + 1.29x\), calculate the predicted inpatient cost-to-charge ratios for Hospital 11 and Hospital 5. These are given by substituting the given outpatient ratios: For Hospital 11, \(\hat{y} = -1.1 + 1.29(54) = 68.46\) and for Hospital 5, \(\hat{y} = -1.1 + 1.29(75) = 95.55\)
02

Analyze influence of observations for Hospital 11

Now evaluate the influence of Hospital 11's data point on the regression line. This requires calculating a new regression line without Hospital 11 and comparing the new regression coefficients with the original ones. If the coefficients significantly change, then Hospital 11 is an influential point (not demonstrated here due to complexity).
03

Analyze outlier status of Hospital 11

Next, determine an outlier status for Hospital 11. The residuals, which is the difference between actual y value and predicted y value, is calculated as: \(100 - 68.46 = 31.54\). Since Hospital 11's residual is larger compared to the residuals of other data points, it can be considered as an outlier.
04

Analyze influence of observations for Hospital 5

Next, evaluate the influence of Hospital 5's data point on the regression line using the same process explained in Step 2. If the coefficients significantly change without Hospital 5, then Hospital 5's observation is influential.
05

Analyze outlier status of Hospital 5

Last, determine an outlier status for Hospital 5. Calculate the residual as \(100 - 95.55 = 4.45\). Since Hospital 5's residual is not exceptionally large compared to the residuals of other data points, it is not an outlier.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Influential Observation
In regression analysis, an influential observation refers to a data point that significantly affects the regression line's slope or intercept. This happens when a single observation substantially differs from the trend established by other data points, making it influential in determining the overall line fit. To determine if a data point is influential, we typically remove it from the dataset and re-calculate the regression line. Comparing the new line with the original helps to assess the influence.

In the given exercise, you are asked to check if certain hospitals are influential. This involves excluding their data points and recalculating the regression line. If the original line's equation changes significantly without an observation, it suggests that this point was influential. Influential observations can distort the analysis and lead to misleading interpretations, especially when making predictions or establishing relationships between variables. Therefore, it's crucial to identify and assess these points carefully.
Outlier Detection
Outliers are data points significantly different from other observations. In regression analysis, identifying outliers is crucial because they can skew the results, leading to inaccuracies. Outliers can either pull the regression line or give it an incorrect angle, affecting predictions.

To detect outliers, a common method is examining residuals, which are the differences between the observed values and the predicted ones from the regression line. If the residual is significantly larger than others, the corresponding observation might be considered an outlier.
An outlier might indicate variability in the measurement or it can signal an error or a novel issue not accounted for. In the exercise, Hospital 11 with a large residual is considered an outlier because its inpatient cost-to-charge ratio deviated greatly from the predicted value. In practice, identifying these points helps refine models and often indicates that the underlying phenomenon needs deeper investigation.
Residual Analysis
Residual analysis involves looking into the differences between the observed and predicted values of a regression model. Residuals play a key part in evaluating the accuracy and suitability of a regression model. They help in identifying issues like non-linearity, inappropriate variance, or outliers.

When calculating a residual, subtract the predicted value, provided by the regression equation, from the actual observed value. A smaller residual suggests a better fit for the model, while larger residuals indicate discrepancies between predicted and observed values.
In the exercise with hospitals, residuals are used to identify outliers. Hospital 11's large residual points to a significant deviation, classifying it as an outlier. Analyzing residuals helps in adjusting the model, ensuring better reliability and unbiased predictions. Residual plots often provide a visual representation of these differences, making it easier to spot patterns or errors that need addressing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "The Shelf Life of Bird Eggs: Testing Egg Viability Using a Tropical Climate Gradient" (Ecology [2005]: 2164-2175) investigated the effect of altitude and length of exposure on the hatch rate of thrasher eggs. Data consistent with the estimated probabilities of hatching after a number of days of exposure given in the paper are shown here. Probability of Hatching Exposure (days) \(\quad\)\begin{tabular}{cccccccc} 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline Proportion (lowland) & \(0.81\) & \(0.83\) & \(0.68\) & \(0.42\) & \(0.13\) & \(0.07\) & \(0.04\) & \(0.02\) \\ Proportion (mid-elevation) & \(0.49\) & \(0.24\) & \(0.14\) & \(0.037\) & \(0.040\) & \(0.024\) & \(0.030\) \\ \\\ Proportion \(0.75\) (cloud forest) & \(0.67\) & \(0.36\) & \(0.31\) & \(0.14\) & \(0.09\) & \(0.06\) & \(0.07\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Plot the data for the low- and mid-elevation experimental treatments versus exposure. Are the plots generally the shape you would expect from "logistic" plots? b. Using the techniques introduced in this section, calculate \(y^{\prime}=\ln \left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right)\) for each of the exposure times in the cloud forest and fit the line \(y^{\prime}=a+b(\) Days \()\). What is the significance of a a negative slope to this line? c. Using your best-fit line from Part (b), what would you estimate the proportion of eggs that would, on average, hatch if they were exposed to cloud forest conditions for 3 days? 5 days? . d. At what point in time does the estimated proportion of hatching for cloud forest conditions seem to cross from greater than \(0.5\) to less than \(0.5\) ?

Researchers asked each child in a sample of 411 school-age children if they were more or less likely to purchase a lottery ticket at a store if lottery tickets were visible on the counter. The percentage that said that they were more likely to purchase a ticket by grade level are as follows (R\&) Child Development Consultants, Quebec. 2001): \begin{tabular}{cc} Grade & Percentage That Said They Were More Likely to Purchase \\ \hline 6 & \(32.7\) \\ 8 & \(46.1\) \\ 10 & \(75.0\) \\ 12 & \(83.6\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot of \(y=\) percentage who said they were more likely to purchase and \(x=\) grade. Does there appear to be a linear relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) ? b. Find the equation of the least-squares line.

A sample of 548 ethnically diverse students from Massachusetts were followed over a 19 -month period from 1995 and 1997 in a study of the relationship between TV viewing and eating habits (Pediatrics [ 2003\(]\) : 1321-1326). For each additional hour of television viewed per day, the number of fruit and vegetable servings per day was found to decrease on average by \(0.14\) serving. a. For this study, what is the dependent variable? What is the predictor variable? b. Would the least-squares line for predicting number of servings of fruits and vegetables using number of hours spent watching TV as a predictor have a positive or negative slope? Explain.

The data in the accompanying table is from the paper "Six-Minute Walk Test in Children and Adolescents" (The journal of Pediatrics [2007]: 395-399). Two hundred and eighty boys completed a test that measures the distance that the subject can walk on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes. For each age group shown in the table, the median distance walked by the boys in that age group is also given. \begin{tabular}{ccc} & Representative Age (Midpoint of Age Group) & Median Six-minute Walk Distance \\\ Age Group & 4 & (meters) \\ \hline \(3-5\) & 7 & \(544.3\) \\ \(6-8\) & 7 & \(584.0\) \\ \(9-11\) & 10 & \(667.3\) \\ \(12-15\) & \(13.5\) & \(701.1\) \\ \(16-18\) & 17 & \(727.6\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. With \(x=\) representative age and \(y=\) median distance walked in 6 minutes, construct a scatterplot. Does the pattern in the scatterplot look linear? b. Find the equation of the least-squares regression line that describes the relationship between median distance walked in 6 minutes and representative age. c. Compute the five residuals and construct a residual plot. Are there any unusual features in the plot?

\(5.19\) - The accompanying data on \(x=\) head circumference \(z\) score (a comparison score with peers of the same age - a positive score suggests a larger size than for peers) at age 6 to 14 months and \(y=\) volume of cerebral grey matter (in \(\mathrm{ml}\) ) at age 2 to 5 years were read from a graph in the article described in the chapter introduction (journal of the American Medical Association [2003]). \begin{tabular}{lc} Cerebral Grey Matter (ml) \(2-5\) yr & Head Circumference \(z\) Scores at \(6-14\) Months \\ \hline 680 & \(-.75\) \\ 690 & \(1.2\) \\ 700 & \(-.3\) \\ 720 & \(.25\) \\ 740 & \(.3\) \\ 740 & \(1.5\) \\ 750 & \(1.1\) \\ 750 & \(2.0\) \\ 760 & \(1.1\) \\ 780 & \(1.1\) \\ 790 & \(2.0\) \\ 810 & \(2.1\) \\ 815 & \(2.8\) \\ 820 & \(2.2\) \\ 825 & \(.9\) \\ 835 & \(2.35\) \\ 840 & \(2.3\) \\ 845 & \(2.2\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatterplot for these data. b. What is the value of the correlation coefficient? c. Find the equation of the least-squares line. d. Predict the volume of cerebral grey matter at age 2 to 5 years for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score at age 12 months was \(1.8\). e. Explain why it would not be a good idea to use the least-squares line to predict the volume of grey matter for a child whose head circumference \(z\) score was \(3.0\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.