/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 The standard deviation alone doe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The standard deviation alone does not measure relative variation. For example, a standard deviation of \(\$ 1\) would be considered large if it is describing the variability from store to store in the price of an ice cube tray. On the other hand, a standard deviation of \(\$ 1\) would be considered small if it is describing store-to-store variability in the price of a particular brand of freezer. A quantity designed to give a relative measure of variability is the coefficient of variation. Denoted by CV, the coefficient of variation expresses the standard deviation as a percentage of the mean. It is defined by the formula \(C V=100\left(\frac{s}{\bar{x}}\right)\). Consider two samples. Sample 1 gives the actual weight (in ounces) of the contents of cans of pet food labeled as having a net weight of 8 ounces. Sample 2 gives the actual weight (in pounds) of the contents of bags of dry pet food labeled as having a net weight of 50 pounds. The weights for the two samples are \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Sample 1 } & 8.3 & 7.1 & 7.6 & 8.1 & 7.6 \\ & 8.3 & 8.2 & 7.7 & 7.7 & 7.5 \\ \text { Sample 2 } & 52.3 & 50.6 & 52.1 & 48.4 & 48.8 \\ & 47.0 & 50.4 & 50.3 & 48.7 & 48.2\end{array}\) a. For each of the given samples, calculate the mean and the standard deviation. b. Compute the coefficient of variation for each sample. Do the results surprise you? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer depends on the calculated mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation for each sample. The coefficient of variation helps us understand the relative variability in the weights of different types and quantities of pet food. Thus, this exercise demonstrates its utility in comparing variability across different scales.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Mean

First, find the mean (average) of each sample by summing up the dataset and then dividing by the number of elements in the sample. For sample 1, use the formula: \(\bar{x_1} = \frac{1}{n_1}\sum_{i=1}^{n_1} x_{1i}\). Similarly for sample 2, \(\bar{x_2} = \frac{1}{n_2}\sum_{i=1}^{n_2} x_{2i}\)
02

Calculate the Standard Deviation

Next, calculate the standard deviation of each sample, which measures the amount of variation in the weights. For each sample, first subtract the mean from each data point and square the result. Then, add up these squared results and divide by the number of data points. Finally, take the square root of this resulting number. Use the formula \(s_i=\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_i-1}\sum_{k=1}^{n_i} (x_{ik}-\bar{x_i})^2}\) for each sample \(i\).
03

Calculate the Coefficient of Variation

Now calculate the coefficient of variation for each sample. The coefficient of variation (CV) is a measure of relative variability. It is the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean, and it is often expressed as a percentage. The formula to calculate the coefficient of variation is \(CV_i=100\left(\frac{s_i}{\bar{x_i}}\right)\).
04

Interpret the Results

Finally, interpret the results. Compare the coefficients of variation for both samples. The sample with the larger coefficient of variation has more variability when compared to the sample's mean. Analyse if this result aligns with the expectation, based on the nature of the samples (different types of pet food). The surprise element in the results could come from the assumption of higher variability expected in larger quantities (50 lbs bag vs 8 ounces can).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a statistical measure that quantifies the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values. It is one of the most widely used metrics for understanding how spread out data points are around the mean (average) value of the dataset. To calculate standard deviation, one typically follows these steps: subtract the mean from each data point to find the deviation of each point, square each deviation to make all values positive, average the squared deviations, and then take the square root of that average.

A smaller standard deviation signifies that the data points tend to be closer to the mean, indicating less variability. Conversely, a larger standard deviation indicates more spread out data points and greater variability. This metric provides a context for the mean, giving users a sense of the 'typical' distance data points are from the average value.
Relative Variability and the Coefficient of Variation
Relative variability is an assessment of how significant the standard deviation is in relation to the mean of the dataset. It answers the question: relative to the size of the mean, how large is the variability? This is crucial when comparing variability across datasets with different units or scales. To measure this, we use the coefficient of variation (CV).

The CV is calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean and then multiplying by 100 to express it as a percentage: \( CV = 100 \left(\frac{s}{\bar{x}}\right) \) where \( s \) is the standard deviation and \( \bar{x} \) is the mean. The higher the CV, the greater the level of dispersion relative to the mean. When CV is used, we can effectively compare how variable two datasets are, regardless of their absolute values or units, as seen in our exercise with different types of pet food weights.
Statistical Analysis in Practice
Statistical analysis involves collecting, exploring, and presenting large amounts of data to discover underlying patterns and trends. This may involve applying various statistical measures, like mean and standard deviation, to make sense of the data collected.

In the context of the provided exercise, statistical analysis allows us to understand not just the typical weights of pet food, but also how consistent those weights are. This is vital for quality control — ensuring consumers get what they pay for. Through calculation of the mean and standard deviation, then interpreting the coefficient of variation, one gets a comprehensive view of the product’s consistency. This ultimately guides manufacturers and consumers alike in making informed decisions. While often surprising, results such as these shed light on the nature of production processes and help in setting or understanding expectations for variability in different products or contexts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Portable Sodal Groups: Willingness to Communicate, Interpersonal Communication Gratifications, and Cell Phone Use among Young Adults" (International journal of Mobile Communications [2007]: \(139-156\) ) describes a study of young adult cell phone use patterns. a. Comment on the following quote from the paper. Do you agree with the authors?? Seven sections of an Introduction to Mass Communication course at a large southern university were surveyed in the spring and fall of 2003 . The sample was chosen because it offered an excellent representation of the population under studyyoung adults. b. Below is another quote from the paper. In this quote, the author reports the mean number of minutes of cell phone use per week for those who participated in the survey. What additional information would have been provided about cell phone use behavior if the author had also reported the standard deviation? Based on respondent estimates, users spent an average of 629 minutes (about \(10.5\) hours) per week using their cell phone on or off line for any reason.

The paper cited in Exercise \(4.65\) also reported values of single-leg power for a low workload. The sample mean for \(n=13\) observations was \(\bar{x}=119.8\) (actually \(119.7692\) ), and the 14 th observation, somewhat of an outlier, was \(159 .\) What is the value of \(\bar{x}\) for the entire sample?

Based on a large national sample of working adults, the U.S. Census Bureau reports the following information on travel time to work for those who do not work at home: lower quartile \(=7\) minutes median \(=18\) minutes upper quartile \(=31\) minutes Also given was the mean travel time, which was reported as \(22.4\) minutes. a. Is the travel time distribution more likely to be approximately symmetric, positively skewed, or negatively skewed? Explain your reasoning based on the given summary quantities. b. Suppose that the minimum travel time was 1 minute and that the maximum travel time in the sample was 205 minutes. Construct a skeletal boxplot for the travel time data. c Were there any mild or extreme outliers in the data set? How can you tell?

An experiment to study the lifetime (in hours) for a certain brand of light bulb involved putting 10 light bulbs into operation and observing them for 1000 hours. Eight of the light bulbs failed during that period, and those lifetimes were recorded. The lifetimes of the two light bulbs still functioning after 1000 hours are recorded as \(1000+\). The resulting sample observations were \(\begin{array}{llllllll}480 & 790 & 1000+ & 350 & 920 & 860 & 570 & 1000+\end{array}\) \(170 \quad 290\) Which of the measures of center discussed in this section can be calculated, and what are the values of those measures?

An advertisement for the " 30 inch Wonder" that appeared in the September 1983 issue of the journal Packaging claimed that the 30 inch Wonder weighs cases and bags up to 110 pounds and provides accuracy to within \(0.25\) ounce. Suppose that a 50 ounce weight was repeatedly weighed on this scale and the weight readings recorded. The mean value was \(49.5\) ounces, and the standard deviation was \(0.1\). What can be said about the proportion of the time that the scale actually showed a weight that was within \(0.25\) ounce of the true value of 50 ounces? (Hint: Use Chebyshev's Rule.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.