/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 Does playing action video games ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does playing action video games provide more than just entertainment? The authors of the paper "Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision" (Psychological Science [2007]: 88-94) concluded that spatial resolution, an important aspect of vision, is improved by playing action video games. They based this conclusion on data from an experiment in which 32 volunteers who had not played action video games were "equally and randomly divided between the experimental and control groups." Subjects in each group

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study claims that playing action video games improves spatial resolution, based on an experiment with 32 volunteers. The volunteers were divided into an experimental group (who played the games) and a control group (who didn't). However, without additional details about the experiment and measurement criteria, further evaluation of the conclusion is difficult.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the research paper

The first step is to understand the research paper. The authors claim that spatial resolution, which is an important aspect of vision, is improved by playing action video games. This conclusion is based on an experiment they conducted with 32 volunteers who were divided into two groups - an experimental group and a control group. The authors do not specify exactly how the experiment was run or what criteria they used to measure the spatial resolution of vision, but we can assume that the experimental group played action video games while the control group did not.
02

Understand the experimental and control groups

The next step is to understand the difference between the experimental and control groups. The experimental group generally refers to the group in an experiment that receives the variable being tested, while the control group does not receive this variable and is used as a benchmark to measure the effects of this variable. In this case, the experimental group would be the group that played action video games.
03

Analyze the conclusion

The final step is to analyze the authors' conclusion. Based on the experiment, they concluded that playing action video games improves spatial resolution. However, without understanding the details of the experiment and the criteria used to measure spatial resolution, it is difficult to evaluate the validity of this conclusion. It's also important to note that this is only one study and further research would be necessary to corroborate these results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Control Group
In scientific experiments, the control group is crucial. It serves as a benchmark, or reference point, against which researchers compare the experimental group's outcomes. Think of it like the control tower guiding planes; it helps us understand what changes and effects are due to the variable being tested. In the study on the effects of action video games on spatial resolution, the control group would be the participants who did not play these games. By not interacting with the variable—in this case, action video games—the control group helps establish a baseline to determine if any observed effects in the experimental group are legitimate.
  • Does not interact with the experimental factor
  • Provides a baseline for comparison
  • Ensures that results are due to the tested variable, not external factors
This careful setup is fundamental to identifying genuine correlations and ensuring the research's conclusions are valid. Without a control group, it would be hard to discern whether any observed changes in the experimental group truly result from the variable being tested or occur naturally.
Experimental Group
The experimental group is where the action happens. It consists of participants who receive the intervention or the variable being tested in a study. In the context of the video game study, this group played action video games.
This group allows researchers to see the direct effects of the independent variable, providing insights into how the variable influences outcomes.
  • Interacts with the variable of interest
  • Shows the effects of the tested hypothesis
  • Key to understanding cause and effect
By comparing this group to the control group, scientists can isolate the effects of the intervention. It's important that participants are assigned randomly to this group to avoid any biases that could skew results. Randomization ensures each subject has an equal chance of being chosen, which increases the reliability of the study’s outcomes.
Thus, differences observed in the experimental group, as compared to the control, can be confidently attributed to the variable being tested.
Scientific Experimentation
Scientific experimentation is a structured process used to test hypotheses and explore cause-effect relationships. It involves the methodical collection and analysis of data, rooted in control and careful measurement.
This method is the backbone of scientific research, providing a framework for researchers to understand complex phenomena.
  • Starts with a hypothesis—an educated guess
  • Involves manipulating variables
  • Employs control and experimental groups for accurate comparison
  • Collects data to support or refute the hypothesis
In our example of the video game study, scientific experimentation was used to explore if action video games improve spatial resolution. Researchers divided participants into control and experimental groups, manipulated an independent variable (video game play), and measured the effect on vision.
Only through scientific experimentation can researchers substantiate claims with empirical evidence, separating confirmed findings from speculation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do ethnic group and gender influence the type of care that a heart patient receives? The following passage is from the article "Heart Care Reflects Race and Sex, Not Symptoms" (USA Today. February 25. 1999 . reprinted with permission): Previous research suggested blacks and women were less likely than whites and men to get cardiac catheterization or coronary bypass surgery for chest pain or a heart attack. Scientists blamed differences in illness severity, insurance coverage, patient preference, and health care access. The researchers eliminated those differences by videotaping actors-two black men, two black women, two white men, and two white women - describing chest pain from identical scripts. They wore identical gowns, used identical gestures, and were taped from the same position. Researchers asked 720 primary care doctors at meetings of the American College of Physicians or the American Academy of Family Physicians to watch a tape and recommend care. The doctors thought the study focused on clinical decision making. Evaluate this experimental design. Do you think this is a good design or a poor design, and why? If you were designing such a study, what, if anything, would you propose to do differently?

The article “Effects of Too Much TV Can Be Undone" (USA Today. October 1,2007 ) included the following paragraph: Researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health report that it's not only how many hours children spend in front of the TV, but at what age they watch that matters. They analyzed data from a national survey in which parents of 2707 children were interviewed first when the children were \(30-33\) months old and again when they were \(5 \frac{1}{2}\), about their TV viewing and their behavior. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. The article says that data from a sample of 2707 parents were used in the study. What other information about the sample would you want in order to evaluate the study?

In many digital environments, users are allowed to choose how they are represented visually online. Does how people are represented online affect online behavior? This question was examined by the authors of the paper "The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior" (Human Communication Research [2007]: 271-290). Participants were randomly assigned either an attractive avatar (a graphical image that represents a person) to represent them or an unattractive avatar. a. The researchers concluded that when interacting with a person of the opposite gender in an online virtual environment, those assigned an attractive avatar moved significantly closer to the other person than those who had been assigned an unattractive avatar. This difference was attributed to the attractiveness of the avatar. Explain why the researchers would not have been able to reach this conclusion if participants had been allowed to choose one of the two avatars (attractive, unattractive) to represent them online. b. Construct a diagram to represent the underlying structure of this experiment.

Participants in a study of honesty in online dating profiles were recruited through print and online advertisements in the Village Voice, one of New York City's most prominent weekly newspapers, and on Craigslist New York City ("The Truth About Lying in Online Dating Profiles," Computer-Human Interaction [2007]: 1-4). The actual height, weight, and age of the participants were compared to what appeared in their online dating profiles. The resulting data was then used to draw conclusions about how common deception was in online dating profiles. What concerns do you have about generalizing conclusions based on data from this study to the population of all people who have an online dating profile? Be sure to address at least two concerns and give the reason for your concern.

You have been asked to determine on what types of grasslands two species of birds, northern harriers and short-eared owls, build nests. The types of grasslands to be used include undisturbed native grasses, managed native grasses, undisturbed nonnative grasses, and managed nonnative grasses. You are allowed a plot of land 500 meters square to study. Explain how you would determine where to plant the four types of grasses. What role would random assignment play in this determination? Identify any confounding variables. Would this study be considered an observational study or an experiment? (Based on the article "Response of Northem Harriers and Short-Eared Owls to Grassland Management in Illinois," Journal of Wildlife Management [1999]: 517-523.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.