/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 To examine the effect of exercis... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

To examine the effect of exercise on body composition, healthy women age 35 to 50 were classified as either active \((9\) hours or more of physical activity per week) or sedentary ("Effects of Habitual Physical Activity on the Resting Metabolic Rates and Body Composition of Women aged 35 to 50 Years." Journal of the American Dietetic Association [2001]: \(1181-1191\) ). Percent body fat was measured and the researchers found that percent body fat was significantly lower for women who were active than for sedentary women. a. Is the study described an experiment? If so, what are the explanatory variable and the response variable? If not, explain why it is not an experiment. b. From this study alone, is it reasonable to conclude that physical activity is the cause of the observed difference in body fat percentage? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The study is not an experiment since treatments were not deliberately imposed on the women. The explanatory variable is the physical activity level and the response variable is the percent body fat. b. From this study alone, it is not reasonable to conclude that physical activity is the cause of the observed difference in body fat percentage. Correlation does not imply causation and other factors might be involved.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the experiment, explanatory variable and the response variable.

An experiment is a study in which a treatment is deliberately imposed on (or withheld from) the units of study in order to observe the possible changes in the responses or conditions being measured. Here, not any treatment is imposed on the women, they randomly fall into the active/sedentary category based on their lifestyle. Hence, it is not an experiment. The explanatory variable, also known as independent variable, is the variable that is manipulated to study its effects on the response variable. In this case, the explanatory variable would be the physical activity level (active or sedentary). The response variable, also called the dependent variable, is the variable that's value is suspected to change as a result of the changes in the explanatory variable. Here, the response variable is the percent body fat.
02

Analyze the cause-effect relationship

Reasoning about whether physical activity is the cause of the observed difference in body fat percentages involves understanding of a cause-effect relationship. A cause-effect relationship exists if changes in one variable lead to changes in another. From the study, it is observed that there exists a correlation between physical activity level and body fat percentages in women. But correlation does not imply causation. The study does not allow us to conclude that being more active causes a decrease in body fat percentage, since there may be other factors (e.g. diet, genetics) contributing to lower body fat.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variable
The explanatory variable in any study helps us understand what factors might be affecting the outcome. In the context of the study examining the effect of exercise on body composition, the explanatory variable is the level of physical activity. This is often referred to as the independent variable because it is assumed to influence or bring about a change in the response variable.

For this particular study, women were classified as either active or sedentary based on their weekly hours of physical activity. It is important to remember that in scientific studies, the terms active and sedentary are categories that can help researchers analyze data. Other examples of explanatory variables include temperature in a climate study or dosage of medication in a medical trial. Each serves to see how modifying or observing these factors might affect the study outcome.
Response Variable
The response variable is the focus of the study's outcome. It's what researchers are trying to observe some change in based on the explanatory variable. Often referred to as the dependent variable, its changes are being measured to see the effects of changes in the explanatory variable.

In this specific study, the response variable is the percent body fat of women aged 35 to 50 years. Researchers were interested in seeing if there was any difference in body fat percentage between women who were active versus those who were sedentary. The response variable provides the primary data that will be critically analyzed to answer the research question. This helps in forming conclusions, such as whether an increase in physical activity is associated with a decrease in body fat percentage.
Correlation vs Causation
Understanding the difference between correlation and causation is crucial in interpreting study results. Correlation refers to a relationship between two variables, where changes in one variable may accompany changes in another. However, this does not mean one causes the other.

In the study about body fat percentage and activity level, there is a clear correlation: active women tend to have different (lower) body fat percentages compared to sedentary women. However, it is vital to note that this does not establish causation. Other factors, like diet or genetics, could also influence body fat.

Causation implies that a change in one variable actually brings about a change in another. To determine causation, more controlled methods such as experiments where variables are manipulated under controlled conditions are typically used. As this study does not control for all other potential variables, it is classified as observational, meaning while it identifies correlation, it does not confirm causation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following paragraph appeared in USA Today (August 6,2009\()\) : Cement doesn't hold up to scrutiny A common treatment that uses medical cement to fix cracks in the spinal bones of elderly people worked no better than a sham treatment, the first rigorous studies of a popular procedure reveal. Pain and disability were virtually the same up to six months later, whether patients had a real treatment or a fake one, shows the research in today's New England Journal of Medicine. Tens of thousands of Americans each year are treated with bone cement, especially older women with osteoporosis. The researchers said it is yet another example of a procedure coming into wide use before proven safe and effective. Medicare pays \(\$ 1,500\) to \(\$ 2,100\) for the outpatient procedure.

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers. January \(9 .\) 2006 ) reports the results of an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lay down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

A study of college students showed a temporary gain of up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does random assignment play in your design?

The financial aid advisor of a university plans to use a stratified random sample to estimate the average amount of money that students spend on textbooks each term. For each of the following proposed stratification schemes, discuss whether it would be worthwhile to stratify the university students in this manner. a. Strata corresponding to class standing (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, graduate student) b. Strata corresponding to field of study, using the following categories: engineering, architecture, business, other c. Strata corresponding to the first letter of the last name: \(A-E, F-K\), etc.

Researchers at the University of Houston decided to test the hypothesis that restaurant servers who squat to the level of their customers would receive a larger tip ("Effect of Server Posture on Restaurant Tipping." Journal of Applied Social Psychology [1993]: \(678-685)\). In the experiment, the waiter would flip a coin to determine whether he would stand or squat next to the table. The waiter would record the amount of the bill and of the tip and whether he stood or squatted. a. Describe the treatments and the response variable. b. Discuss possible extraneous variables and how they could be controlled. c. Discuss whether blocking would be necessary. d. Identify possible confounding variables. e. Discuss the role of random assignment in this experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.