/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 The authors of the paper "Popula... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The authors of the paper "Popular Video Games: Quantifying the Presentation of Violence and its Context" (Journal of Broadcasting \& Electronic Media [2003]: \(58-76\) ) investigated the relationship between video game rating- suitable for everyone (E), suitable for 13 years of age and older (T), and suitable for 17 years of age and older (M) - and the number of violent interactions per minute of play. The sample of games examined consisted of 60 video games-the 20 most popular (by sales) for each of three game systems. The researchers concluded that video games rated for older children had significantly more violent interactions per minute than did those games rated for more general audiences. a. Do you think that the sample of 60 games was selected in a way that makes it reasonable to think it is representative of the population of all video games? b. Is it reasonable to generalize the researchers' conclusion to all video games? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. No, the sample of 60 games selected may not be representative of all video games. This is due to the fact that they were selected based on their sales popularity, not randomly, which could introduce bias into the sample. b. Despite the researchers' conclusion, it is not completely reasonable to generalize their results to all video games, because the selection of games was not diverse and might not accurately represent less-popular or various types of games.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the Selection process

Consider the selection of 60 video games. They were chosen based on being the most popular ones by sales for each of the three game systems. It can be observed that the selection was not random but rather based on sales popularity. Therefore, it can be argued that the results may be biased toward the preferences of buyers who contribute the most to the video games sales.
02

Understanding the Variety of Games

In order to be representative, the sample should comprise a broad variety of games, not just those that are most popular. This collection, however, consists solely of highly purchased games and therefore it might not represent accurately games which are lesser-known or have fewer sales.
03

Generalizing the Results

Examine whether it is reasonable to extend the research findings to all video games. Given the sample's limitations, it may not be entirely reasonable to generalize the findings. While there might be a pattern indicating that games rated for older children have more violent interactions, this might not hold true for all video games since the sample only looked at popular games from three systems. For a more comprehensive conclusion, studies across a wider range of games, not just popular ones, would be beneficial.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Selection
When conducting research, choosing how to select your sample is one of the most important decisions. The sample of 60 video games in this study was not randomly selected.
Instead, it consisted of the 20 most popular games by sales from three major systems. This means the sample was biased towards what consumers were buying the most.

To have a more representative sample:
  • Include a wider diversity of game titles, not just the popular ones.
  • Select games across various genres and publishers.
  • Use random selection methods to capture the broader market.
Only then could the researchers claim that their findings accurately reflect the entire video game population.
Generalization
Generalization means extending the findings from your sample to the whole population. In this case, it would mean taking conclusions about all video games based on this selected sample of 60.
However, caution is needed since the sample only reflects the most popular games.

For effective generalization, you should:
  • Start with a representative sample.
  • Ensure the findings apply to various types and categories within the population.
  • Conduct further studies to see if the patterns observable in the sample hold true for the rest of the games.
In summary, while some findings in this research might hint at broader trends, the limited selection restricts their applicability to all video games.
Bias in Research
Bias in research can skew results and lead to inaccurate conclusions. In the study on video games, bias was introduced through non-random sample selection.
This happens when influencing factors, such as a game's popularity, are highlighted more than others.

To minimize bias:
  • Use random sampling techniques to improve fairness.
  • Seek to include various voices and perspectives that may be underrepresented.
  • Acknowledge and account for any potential skew in analysis and conclusion.
Recognizing bias enables researchers to mitigate its effects, ensuring that their findings are as accurate and generalizable as possible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers. January \(9 .\) 2006 ) reports the results of an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lay down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

Is status related to a student's understanding of science? The article "From Here to Equity: The Influence of Status on Student Access to and Understanding of Science" (Culture and Comparative Studies [1999]: \(577-602\) described a study on the effect of group discussions on learning biology concepts. An analysis of the relationship between status and "rate of talk" (the number of on-task speech acts per minute) during group work included gender as a blocking variable. Do you think that gender is a useful blocking variable? Explain.

A study of more than 50,000 U.S. nurses found that those who drank just one soda or fruit punch a day tended to gain much more weight and had an \(80 \%\) increased risk in developing diabetes compared to those who drank less than one a month. (The Washington Post, August 25,2004 ). "The message is clear. ... Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages," said Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public Health, who helped conduct the study. The sugar and beverage industries said that the study was fundamentally flawed. "These allegations are inflammatory. Women who drink a lot of soda may simply have generally unhealthy lifestyles," said Richard Adamson of the American Beverage Association. a. Do you think that the study described was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that drinking soda or fruit punch causes the observed increased risk of diabetes? Why or why not?

Do ethnic group and gender influence the type of care that a heart patient receives? The following passage is from the article "Heart Care Reflects Race and Sex, Not Symptoms" (USA Today. February 25. 1999 . reprinted with permission): Previous research suggested blacks and women were less likely than whites and men to get cardiac catheterization or coronary bypass surgery for chest pain or a heart attack. Scientists blamed differences in illness severity, insurance coverage, patient preference, and health care access. The researchers eliminated those differences by videotaping actors-two black men, two black women, two white men, and two white women - describing chest pain from identical scripts. They wore identical gowns, used identical gestures, and were taped from the same position. Researchers asked 720 primary care doctors at meetings of the American College of Physicians or the American Academy of Family Physicians to watch a tape and recommend care. The doctors thought the study focused on clinical decision making. Evaluate this experimental design. Do you think this is a good design or a poor design, and why? If you were designing such a study, what, if anything, would you propose to do differently?

The authors of the paper "Illicit Use of Psychostimulants among College Students" (Psychology, Health \& Medicine [2002]: 283-287) surveyed college students about their use of legal and illegal stimulants. The sample of students surveyed consisted of students enrolled in a psychology class at a small, competitive college in the United States. a. Was this sample a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Give two reasons why the estimate of the proportion of students who reported using illegal stimulants based on data from this survey should not be generalized to all U.S. college students.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.