/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 49 The article "Portable MP3 Player... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005, only \(15 \%\) reported owning an \(\mathrm{MP} 3\) player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size 1112 . Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to 2006 ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportion of Americans who owned MP3 players between the years 2005 to 2006 is approximately \([0.013, 0.087]\). Since the interval doesn't include zero, there is evidence to suggest that there was a significant increase in ownership between these two years.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the sample proportions

First we need to determine the proportions for both years. In 2006, 20% of 1112 people reportedly owned an MP3 player, so the sample proportion is 0.20. Similarly, in 2005, the sample proportion is 0.15. So we have \( p_1 = 0.20 \) and \( p_2 = 0.15 \). Of course, we also know the total number of people surveyed, \( n_1 = n_2 = 1112 \).
02

Calculate the difference and standard error

We are interested in the difference \(d = p_1 - p_2\), so we calculate that and find \(d = 0.20 - 0.15 = 0.05\). Next, we need to calculate the standard error (SE) of the difference. The formula for this is \(\sqrt{{p_1(1 - p_1) / n_1 + p_2(1 - p_2) / n_2}}\), resulting in an approximate SE of 0.019.
03

Construct the confidence interval

A \(95\%\) confidence interval is defined as the sample difference \(±\) the margin of error (ME). The ME can be calculated by multiplying the standard error by the z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence. For a \(95\%\) confidence level, the z-score is approximately 1.96. Therefore, the ME = 1.96 * SE = 1.96 * 0.019 = 0.037. The confidence interval then becomes 0.05 \(±\) 0.037, or approximately \([0.013, 0.087]\).
04

Interpret the results

The resulting confidence interval doesn't include zero, which suggests that the increase in MP3 player ownership from 2005 to 2006 is statistically significant. In other words, the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned MP3 players likely did increase during this one-year period.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion
A sample proportion is a metric used to describe the proportion of a characteristic within a subset of your total population. This is useful in surveys or research where measuring every individual in a population is impractical. For example, in a survey conducted in 2006, 20% of the sample reported owning an MP3 player. Here, the sample proportion is represented as 0.20. Similarly, the sample proportion from 2005 is 0.15, indicating 15% ownership. To calculate a sample proportion, follow these steps:
  • Identify the characteristic of interest, such as MP3 ownership.
  • Divide the number of individuals with the characteristic by the total sample size. For example, if 222 people out of 1112 owned an MP3 player, divide 222 by 1112 to get 0.20.
  • Use this proportion in further statistical analysis to generalize to the broader population.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) tells us how much variability we can expect in the sample proportion estimates if we repeated the survey many times. It acts as a measure of precision or spread of the sample proportion.To calculate the standard error of difference between two proportions, use this formula:\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1 - p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1 - p_2)}{n_2}} \]Where:
  • \( p_1 \) and \( p_2 \) are the sample proportions from 2006 and 2005, respectively.
  • \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes for each year, in this case, both are 1112.
Using the given proportions, the calculated SE provides an estimate of 0.019. The smaller the standard error, the more precise the estimate of the sample proportion.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance helps us determine if the observed difference or relationship in the data could have occurred by random chance. In the context of proportions, it tells us whether the change in ownership from 2005 to 2006 is likely to reflect a true shift in the population.To check for statistical significance:
  • Look at the confidence interval, which is constructed using the standard error and the z-score for the chosen confidence level. A 95% confidence interval means you are 95% confident that the interval contains the true difference.
  • If the confidence interval excludes zero, it suggests there is a statistically significant difference. In this exercise, the interval is \([0.013, 0.087]\), meaning zero is not included. This suggests a statistically significant increase in MP3 player ownership from 2005 to 2006.
Proportion Difference Estimation
Proportion difference estimation is used to determine the difference between two proportions from different groups or time periods. It provides insights into changes or differences in a particular characteristic, such as MP3 player ownership, over time or between groups. Here's how to estimate the difference between two proportions:
  • Calculate the difference between the two sample proportions. For instance, in this exercise, it’s the ownership difference from 2006 to 2005, or 0.20 - 0.15, resulting in 0.05.
  • Construct a confidence interval around this difference to understand the range within which the true difference may lie. The standard error and the confidence level contribute to computing the margin of error used in forming the interval.
  • The confidence interval \([0.013, 0.087]\) indicates that the true proportion difference likely lies within this range, with the center at 0.05. This helped determine that there was a reliable increase in ownership between these years.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The report "Young People Living on the Edge" (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 2008 ) summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 600 young adults (age 19 to 35 ) and the other sample consisted of 300 parents of children age 19 to \(35 .\) The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support to their child in that situation. a. When asked about getting married, \(41 \%\) of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and \(43 \%\) of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different. b. The report stated that the proportion of young adults who thought parents would help with buying a house or apartment was \(37 .\) For the sample of parents, the proportion who said they would help with buying a house or an apartment was . \(27 .\) Based on these data, can you conclude that the proportion of parents who say they would help with buying a house or an apartment is significantly less than the proportion of young adults who think that their parents would help?

The authors of the paper "Adolescents and MP3 Players: Too Many Risks, Too Few Precautions" (Pediatrics 12009 ] e953-e958) concluded that more boys than girls listen to music at high volumes. This conclusion was based on data from independent random samples of 764 Dutch boys and 748 Dutch girls age 12 to \(19 .\) Of the boys, 397 reported that they almost always listen to music at a high volume setting. Of the girls, 331 reported listening to music at a high volume setting. Do the sample data support the authors' conclusion that the proportion of Dutch boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than this proportion for Dutch girls? Test the relevant hypotheses using a \(.01\) significance level.

Suppose that you were interested in investigating the effect of a drug that is to be used in the treatment of patients who have glaucoma in both eyes. A comparison berween the mean reduction in eye pressure for this drug and for a standard treatment is desired. Both treatments are applied directly to the eye. a. Describe how you would go about collecting data for your investigation. b. Does your method result in paired data? c. Can you think of a reasonable method of collecting data that would not result in paired samples? Would such an experiment be as informative as a paired experiment? Comment.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety issucd a press release titled "Teen Drivers Often lgnoring Bans on Using Cell Phones" (June 9,2008 ). The following quote is from the press release: Just \(1-2\) months prior to the ban's \(\underline{\text { Dec. } 1,2006}\) start, 11 percent of teen drivers were observed using cell phones as they left school in the afternoon. Abour 5 months after the ban took effect, \(12 \%\) of teen drivers were observed using cell phones. Suppose that the two samples of teen drivers (before the ban, after the ban) can be regarded as representative of these populations of teen drivers. Suppose also that 200 teen drivers were observed before the ban (so \(n_{1}=200\) and \(\hat{p}_{1}=.11\) ) and 150 teen drivers were observed after the ban. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportion using a cell phone while driving before the ban and the proportion after the ban. b. Is zero included in the confidence interval of Part (c)? What does this imply about the difference in the population proportions?

Some commercial airplanes recirculate approximately \(50 \%\) of the cabin air in order to increase fuel efficiency. The authors of the paper "Aircraft Cabin Air Redrculation and Symptoms of the Common Cold" (journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: 483-486) studied 1100 airline passengers who flew from San Francisco to Denver between January and April 1999\. Some passengers traveled on airplanes that recirculated air and others traveled on planes that did not recirculate air. Of the 517 passengers who flew on planes that did not recirculate air, 108 reported post-flight respiratory symptoms, while 111 of the 583 passengers on planes that did recirculate air reported such symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of passengers with post-flight respiratory symptoms differs for planes that do and do not recirculate air? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). You may assume that it is reasonable to regard these two samples as being independently selected and as representative of the two populations of interest.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.