/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Water samples are taken from wat... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Water samples are taken from water used for cooling as it is being discharged from a power plant into a river. It has been determined that as long as the mean temperature of the discharged water is at most \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), there will be no negative effects on the river's ecosystem. To investigate whether the plant is in compliance with regulations that prohibit a mean discharge water temperature above \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), researchers will take 50 water samples at randomly selected times and record the temperature of each sample. The resulting data will be used to test the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu=150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) versus \(\left.H_{a}: \mu\right\rangle\) \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). In the context of this example, describe Type I and Type II errors. Which type of error would you consider more serious? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Type I error occurs when we incorrectly reject the true null hypothesis. Type II error occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. Given the potential danger to the river's ecosystem, a Type II error, where the power plant's violation of regulation goes undetected, could be considered more serious in this context.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Type I Error

A Type I error would occur if the actual mean temperature of the water is at most 150 degrees Fahrenheit, but the test leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\). This means that the researchers incorrectly conclude that the power plant is in violation of regulations when it isn't.
02

Understanding Type II Error

A Type II error would occur if the mean temperature of the discharged water is more than 150 degrees Fahrenheit, but the test lead to acceptance of the null hypothesis. This means the researchers incorrectly conclude that the power plant is in compliance with regulations when it really isn't.
03

Evaluating Which Error is More Serious

Which error is more serious depends on the context. However, considering the potential ecological damage, a Type II error could be considered more serious in this case. Overlooking a situation where the power plant discharges too hot water could have serious negative effects on the river's ecosystem, potentially killing off species and disrupting balance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
In statistical hypothesis testing, a Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected while it is actually true. Consider the situation in the context of the power plant scenario. Scientists believe that the mean temperature of discharged water should not exceed 150°F to prevent harm to the river's ecosystem. If the null hypothesis (the water temperature is 150°F or less) is mistakenly rejected, the researchers would erroneously conclude that the plant is not within safe limits despite actually being compliant.

This false alarm represents a Type I error. The consequence of making such an error includes unnecessary regulatory actions against the power plant, which could lead to financial and operational impacts without any real environmental benefit.
  • Incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis
  • Concluding a violation that did not occur
  • Potential needless interventions
Type II Error
A Type II error happens when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it should be. In our scenario, this would mean that the mean temperature of discharged water is actually above 150°F, but researchers incorrectly accept the null hypothesis instead of rejecting it. Essentially, it means concluding compliance with environmental regulations when there is, indeed, a breach.

This could have serious environmental consequences, as overlooking the real over-limit temperature could lead to thermal pollution. This might damage ecological balance, affecting aquatic life in the river negatively, sometimes irreversibly.
  • Failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false
  • Inaccurate compliance indication
  • Risk of ecological damage
Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are critical in identifying and managing potential negative environmental effects of industrial activities like power generation. In the case of the power plant, ongoing temperature monitoring of discharged water forms part of such an assessment.

These assessments help ensure that industrial activities do not significantly harm ecosystems. They provide a framework for measuring the impact and implementing mitigation strategies. By assessing potential Type I and Type II errors in hypothesis testing, EIAs highlight the importance of accurate data interpretation in preserving environmental health.
  • Monitor and assess potential ecological impacts
  • Ensure compliance with environmental standards
  • Help create sustainable operational practices

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Theaters Losing Out to Living Rooms" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, June 17,2005\()\) states that movie attendance declined in \(2005 .\) The Associated Press found that 730 of 1000 randomly selected adult Americans preferred to watch movies at home rather than at a movie theater. Is there convincing evidence that the majority of adult Americans prefer to watch movies at home? Test the relevant hypotheses using a . 05 significance level.

Although arsenic is known to be a poison, it also has some beneficial medicinal uses. In one study of the use of arsenic to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a rare type of blood cell cancer, APL patients were given an arsenic compound as part of their treatment. Of those receiving arsenic, \(42 \%\) were in remission and showed no signs of leukemia in a subsequent examination (Washington Post, November 5, 1998). It is known that \(15 \%\) of APL patients go into remission after the conventional treatment. Suppose that the study had included 100 randomly selected patients (the actual number in the study was much smaller). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion in remission for the arsenic treatment is greater than \(.15\), the remission proportion for the conventional treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

The paper "Playing Active Video Games Increases Energy Expenditure in Children" (Pediatrics [2009]: 534-539) describes an interesting investigation of the possible cardiovascular benefits of active video games. Mean heart rate for healthy boys age 10 to 13 after walking on a treadmill at \(2.6 \mathrm{~km} /\) hour for 6 minutes is 98 beats per minute (bpm). For each of 14 boys, heart rate was measured after 15 minutes of playing Wii Bowling. The resulting sample mean and standard deviation were \(101 \mathrm{bpm}\) and \(15 \mathrm{bpm}\), respectively. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of boys as representative of boys age 10 to 13 and that the distribution of heart rates after 15 minutes of Wii Bowling is approximately normal. a. Does the sample provide convincing evidence that the mean heart rate after 15 minutes of Wii Bowling is different from the known mean heart rate after 6 minutes walking on the treadmill? Carry out a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=.01\). b. The known resting mean heart rate for boys in this age group is \(66 \mathrm{bpm}\). Is there convincing evidence that the mean heart rate after Wii Bowling for 15 minutes is higher than the known mean resting heart rate for boys of this age? Use \(\alpha=.01\).

The article "Fewer Parolees Land Back Behind Bars" (Associated Press, April II, 2006 ) includes the fol-lowing statement: "Just over \(38 \%\) of all felons who were released from prison in 2003 landed back behind bars by the end of the following year, the lowest rate since \(1979 .^{\prime \prime}\) Explain why it would not be necessary to carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the proportion of felons released in 2003 was less than \(.40\).

To determine whether the pipe welds in a nuclear power plant meet specifications, a random sample of welds is selected and tests are conducted on each weld in the sample. Weld strength is measured as the force required to break the weld. Suppose that the specifications state that the mean strength of welds should exceed \(100 \mathrm{lb} / \mathrm{in}^{2} .\) The inspection team decides to test \(H_{0}: \mu=100\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>100 .\) Explain why this alternative hypothesis was chosen rather than \(\mu<100\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.