/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 A manufacturer of hand-held calc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A manufacturer of hand-held calculators receives large shipments of printed circuits from a supplier. It is too costly and time-consuming to inspect all incoming circuits, so when each shipment arrives, a sample is selccted for inspcction. Information from the samplc is then used to test \(H_{0}: p=.01\) versus \(H_{a}: p>.01\), where \(p\) is the actual proportion of defective circuits in the shipment. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, the shipment is accepted, and the circuits are used in the production of calculators. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the entire shipment is returned to the supplier because of inferior quality. (A shipment is defined to be of inferior quality if it contains more than \(1 \%\) defective circuits.) a. In this context, define Type I and Type II errors. b. From the calculator manufacturer's point of view, which type of error is considered more serious? ca From the printed circuit supplier's point of view, which type of error is considered more serious?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. In this context, a Type I error occurs when a shipment containing \(1\%\) or fewer defective components is rejected, while a Type II error occurs when a shipment with more than \(1\%\) defective components is accepted. \nb. From the manufacturer's point of view, a Type II error (accepting a defective batch) is more serious as it can lead to severe financial and reputational damage. \nc. From the supplier's point of view, a Type I error (rejecting a good batch) is more serious as it can result in a loss of income and potential damage to business relationships.

Step by step solution

01

Define Type I and II Errors In Context

In statistics, a Type I error occurs when a true null hypothesis is rejected, whereas a Type II error is the failure to reject a false null hypothesis. In the context of this exercise: \n- A Type I error would occur if the manufacturer rejects a shipment of non-defective circuits (i.e., the proportion of defective circuits is truly \(0.01\), or \(1%\), but the manufacturer wrongly rejects this shipment under the assumption that it contains more than \(1\%\) defective circuits). \n- A Type II error would occur if the manufacturer accepts a shipment of defective circuits (i.e., the proportion of defective circuits is greater than \(1%\), but the manufacturer incorrectly accepts the shipment under the assumption that it contains less or equal to \(1\%\) defective circuits).
02

Evaluating the Consequences of Errors from the Manufacturer's Perspective

From the calculator manufacturer's point of view, a Type II error is likely more severe. This error would mean the manufacturer incorporates faulty circuits into their calculators, which could lead to broader product malfunction, consequent recalls, damage to brand reputation, and loss of customers and profits.
03

Evaluating the Consequences of Errors from the Supplier's Perspective

From the printed circuit supplier's point of view, a Type I error is likely more serious. This error would mean that a shipment of circuits that are fine (with defect rate within acceptable bounds) gets rejected. This could lead to a loss of income from the rejected shipment, potential damage to business relationships, and costs associated with reshipping or scrapping the rejected batch.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
A Type I error is a statistical misstep that occurs when a true null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected. In the context of quality control for a manufacturer, this means rejecting a shipment of circuits that actually comply with quality standards. Imagine a shipment where only 1% of the circuits are defective, meeting the supplier's criteria. If the manufacturer tests the sample and finds it faulty due to incorrect conclusions, they reject this shipment. This misjudgment can lead to unnecessary rejection costs, extra inspections, and possible strain on supplier relationships.
  • Mistaken Rejection: Rejecting good shipments increases operational hurdles.
  • Financial Loss: Suppliers face potential revenue loss due to unwarranted rejections.
  • Business Relations: These errors could sour manufacturer-supplier relations.
Understanding and minimizing Type I errors is crucial to maintaining efficient, cost-effective quality processes.
Type II Error
A Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis is accepted. Specifically, in this scenario, it means accepting a shipment of circuits that does not meet quality standards — where more than 1% of circuits are defective. This can have serious implications for the manufacturer. As defective circuits are used in calculator production, the end products may malfunction.
  • Product Quality: Integrating faulty circuits affects product reliability.
  • Customer Satisfaction: Flaws in calculators could lead to customer dissatisfaction and complaints.
  • Brand Reputation: Continuous malfunctions harm brand image and consumer trust.
Preventing Type II errors is vital to ensure that high product quality and customer satisfaction are maintained.
Quality Control
In the realm of manufacturing, quality control plays a pivotal role in ensuring products meet specific standards. The inspection process used by the hand-held calculator manufacturer is a prime example of quality control in action. By statistically testing the proportion of defective circuits, the manufacturer ensures only quality shipments are accepted and used.
  • Sampling: Inspecting a sample is cost-effective and time efficient, crucial for large shipments.
  • Decision Making: Statistical hypothesis testing assists in making informed decisions about shipment quality.
  • Error Considerations: Understanding potential errors helps refine testing processes, enhancing overall quality control.
Effective quality control strategies are fundamental to operational success, maintaining product standards and, ultimately, business profitability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\mu\) denote the mean diameter for bearings of a certain type. A test of \(H_{0}: \mu=0.5\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 0.5\) will be based on a sample of \(n\) bearings. The diameter distribution is believed to be normal. Determine the value of \(\beta\) in each of the following cases: a. \(n=15, \alpha=.05, \sigma=0.02, \mu=0.52\) b. \(n=15, \alpha=.05, \sigma=0.02, \mu=0.48\) c. \(n=15, \alpha=.01, \sigma=0.02, \mu=0.52\) d. \(n=15, \alpha=.05, \sigma=0.02, \mu=0.54\) e. \(n=15, \alpha=.05, \sigma=0.04, \mu=0.54\) f. \(n=20, \alpha=.05, \sigma=0.04, \mu=0.54\) g. Is the way in which \(\beta\) changes as \(n, \alpha, \sigma\), and \(\mu\) vary consistent with your intuition? Explain.

Although arsenic is known to be a poison, it also has some beneficial medicinal uses. In one study of the use of arsenic to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a rare type of blood cell cancer, APL patients were given an arsenic compound as part of their treatment. Of those receiving arsenic, \(42 \%\) were in remission and showed no signs of leukemia in a subsequent examination (Washington Post, November 5, 1998). It is known that \(15 \%\) of APL patients go into remission after the conventional treatment. Suppose that the study had included 100 randomly selected patients (the actual number in the study was much smaller). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion in remission for the arsenic treatment is greater than \(.15\), the remission proportion for the conventional treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

The paper "Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences and Over-Indebtedness" (Social Science Research Network, Working paper WI4808, 2008 ) included analysis of data from a national sample of 1000 Americans. One question on the survey was: "You owe \(\$ 3000\) on your credit card. You pay a minimum payment of \(\$ 30\) each month. At an Annual Percentage Rate of \(12 \%\) (or \(1 \%\) per month), how many years would it take to eliminate your credit card debt if you made no additional charges?" Answer options for this question were: (a) less than 5 years; (b) between 5 and 10 years; (c) between 10 and 15 years; (d) never-you will continue to be in debt; (e) don't know; and (f) prefer not to answer. a. Only 354 of the 1000 respondents chose the correct answer of never. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the sample is representative of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than \(.40(40 \%) ?\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) to test the appropriate hypotheses. b. The paper also reported that \(37.8 \%\) of those in the sample chose one of the wrong answers \((a, b\), and \(c)\) as their response to this question. Is it reasonable to conclude that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

To determine whether the pipe welds in a nuclear power plant meet specifications, a random sample of welds is selected and tests are conducted on each weld in the sample. Weld strength is measured as the force required to break the weld. Suppose that the specifications state that the mean strength of welds should exceed \(100 \mathrm{lb} / \mathrm{in}^{2} .\) The inspection team decides to test \(H_{0}: \mu=100\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu>100 .\) Explain why this alternative hypothesis was chosen rather than \(\mu<100\).

Researchers at the University of Washington and Harvard University analyzed records of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluations ("Mammogram Cancer Scares More Frequent than Thought," USA Today. April 16, 1998). Discussing the benefits and downsides of the screening process, the article states that, although the rate of false-positives is higher than previously thought, if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise. Suppose that such a screening test is used to decide between a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}:\) no cancer is present and an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}\) : cancer is present. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. Would a false-positive (thinking that cancer is present when in fact it is not) be a Type I error or a Type II error? b. Describe a Type I error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type I error. c. Describe a Type II error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type II error. d. What aspect of the relationship between the probability of Type I and Type II errors is being described by the statement in the article that if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.