/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 77 Are college students who take a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Are college students who take a freshman orientation course more or less likely to stay in college than those who do not take such a course? The article "A Longitudinal Study of the Retention and Academic Performance of Participants in Freshmen Orientation Courses" (Journal of College Student Development \([1994]: 444-\) 449) reported that 50 of 94 randomly selected students who did not participate in an orientation course returned for a second year. Of 94 randomly selected students who did take the orientation course, 56 returned for a second year. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\), the difference in the proportion returning for students who do not take an orientation course and those who do. Give an interpretation of this interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \(95\%\) confidence interval for \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\) will provide a range of values that includes the true population parameter \(95\%\) of the time. The interpretation will depend on the computed interval. If 0 is included in the interval, then there is no significant difference in the return rates for the two groups.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Given Data

From the problem, we know that 50 of 94 students who did not participate in the orientation course returned for a second year, therefore \(\pi_{1} = \frac{50}{94}\). Similarly, 56 of 94 students who did take the course, returned for a second year, so \(\pi_{2} = \frac{56}{94}\). We are asked to compute a \(95\%\) confidence interval.
02

Calculate the Standard Error

The standard error (SE) for \(\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}\) can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{SE}_{\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi_{1} (1 - \pi_{1})}{n_1} + \frac{\pi_{2} (1 - \pi_{2})}{n_2}} \] Where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) represent the number of individuals in each group, both of which are 94 in this case.
03

Calculate the Confidence Interval

A \(95\%\) confidence interval can be calculated using the following formula: \[ CI = (\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}) \pm Z_{0.025} \times \text{SE}_{\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}} \] Here \(Z_{0.025}\) is the z-value for a \(95\%\) interval, which is 1.96.
04

Interpret the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval will give the range of values within which we are \(95\%\) confident that the difference between the two proportions lies. If the interval includes 0, it suggests no significant difference between the likelihood of returning to college based on whether or not they attended the orientation. If all values in the interval are positive (or negative), it would suggest a significant difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Difference
When we talk about the proportion difference, we're essentially looking at comparing two groups. In this exercise, we are comparing the proportion of college students who return for a second year between those who took a freshman orientation course and those who didn’t. To do this, we calculate each group's proportion separately. For students who did not take the course, it's \[\pi_{1} = \frac{50}{94}\]For those who took the course, the proportion is \[\pi_{2} = \frac{56}{94}\]The purpose of finding a proportion difference is to see if there is any meaningful difference in outcomes between these two groups. We express the difference as \[\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}\] This difference helps us explore how impactful the orientation course might be.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a way to understand if the difference we observed in the data is substantial, or if it could have happened by random chance. In our scenario, we want to determine if the difference in proportions of returning students is statistically significant. Statistical tests, such as hypothesis testing, help in calculating this significance. If a result is statistically significant, it means that the observed difference is probably not due to random chance. We often use a confidence interval to infer this; if the interval does not contain zero, the difference is significant. For a 95% confidence level, we use a critical value (z-value) of 1.96. This means that only 5% of the time, such a difference would occur by chance if there were no real difference in the population. The result gives us a measure of confidence in the observed difference.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) is a crucial concept when calculating the confidence interval for the difference in proportions. It gives us an idea of how much variability we might expect in our sample proportions.For two independent groups, like in our case, the standard error can be calculated as:\[\text{SE}_{\pi_{1} - \pi_{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi_{1} \times (1 - \pi_{1})}{n_1} + \frac{\pi_{2} \times (1 - \pi_{2})}{n_2}}\]Here, \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) represent the sample sizes of each group respectively, which are both 94 students. SE helps determine how ‘spread out’ the proportion difference might be from the true population proportion difference.A smaller SE indicates more reliable estimates of the proportion difference, helping us create a more precise confidence interval.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a systematic method used to decide whether the observed data supports a certain belief or hypothesis. In this context, we are interested in knowing if taking a freshman orientation course has a statistically significant effect on whether students return for the second year.Usually, we start with a null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) that states there is no difference between the two groups, meaning \(\pi_{1} - \pi_{2} = 0\).The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) challenges this, suggesting that the difference is not zero.We use a confidence interval to test our hypothesis. If the interval includes zero, we fail to reject the null hypothesis; this implies no significant effect. If zero is not in the interval, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a significant difference.This process is crucial for research and decision-making as it provides a statistical basis for conclusions based on sample data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Workaholism in Organizations: Gender Differences" (Sex Roles [1999]: \(333-346\) ) gave the following data on 1996 income (in Canadian dollars) for random samples of male and female MBA graduates from a particular Canadian business school: \begin{tabular}{lccc} & \(\boldsymbol{n}\) & \(\boldsymbol{x}\) & \(\boldsymbol{s}\) \\ \hline Males & 258 & \(\$ 133,442\) & \(\$ 131,090\) \\ Females & 233 & \(\$ 105,156\) & \(\$ 98,525\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. For what significance levels would you conclude that the mean salary of female MBA graduates of this business school is above \(\$ 100,000\) ? b. Is there convincing evidence that the mean salary for female MBA graduates of this business school is lower than the mean salary for the male graduates?

The article "A 'White' Name Found to Help in Job Search" (Associated Press, January 15,2003 ) described in experiment to investigate if it helps to have a "whitesounding" first name when looking for a job. Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white- sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black-sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. Resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and resumes of the second type only 167 responses. Do these data support the theory that the proportion receiving positive responses is higher for those resumes with "whitesounding first" names?

The paper "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children in a National Household Survey" (Pediatrics [2004]: \(112-118\) ) investigated the effect of fast-food consumption on other dietary variables. For a sample of 663 teens who reported that they did not eat fast food during a typical day, the mean daily calorie intake was 2258 and the sample standard deviation was \(1519 .\) For a sample of 413 teens who reported that they did eat fast food on a typical day, the mean calorie intake was 2637 and the standard deviation was 1138 . a. What assumptions about the two samples must be reasonable in order for the use of the two-sample \(t\) confidence interval to be appropriate? b. Use the given information to estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

In a study of memory recall, eight students from a large psychology class were selected at random and given 10 min to memorize a list of 20 nonsense words. Each was asked to list as many of the words as he or she could remember both \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) and \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) later, as shown in the accompanying table. Is there evidence to suggest that the mean number of words recalled after \(1 \mathrm{hr}\) exceeds the mean recall after \(24 \mathrm{hr}\) by more than 3 ? Use a level \(.01\) test. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\\ 1 \text { hr later } & 14 & 12 & 18 & 7 & 11 & 9 & 16 & 15 \\ 24 \text { hr later } & 10 & 4 & 14 & 6 & 9 & 6 & 12 & 12\end{array}\)

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article that describes the results of a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. In the study, 107 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved and \(27 \%\) of the patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.