/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 80 The positive effect of water flu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The positive effect of water fluoridation on dental health is well documented. One study that validates this is described in the article "Impact of Water Fluoridation on Children's Dental Health: A Controlled Study of Two Pennsylvania Communities" (American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section \([1981]:\) 262-265). Two communities were compared. One had adopted fluoridation in 1966, whereas the other had no such program. Of 143 randomly selected children from the town without fluoridated water, 106 had decayed teeth, and 67 of 119 randomly selected children from the town with fluoridated water had decayed teeth. Let \(\pi_{1}\) denote the true proportion of children drinking fluoridated water who have decayed teeth, and let \(\pi_{2}\) denote the analogous proportion for children drinking unfluoridated water. Estimate \(\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}\) using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. Does the interval contain \(0 ?\) Interpret the interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution will be the resulting confidence interval which will be found after these calculations. If the confidence interval contains zero, that suggests that there may be no significant difference in decay rates between the two communities. The specific confidence interval will give more details about the significance and range of this difference.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate proportions

Firstly, the proportion of children with decayed teeth who drink fluoridated and unfluoridated water should be calculated. The proportion \(p_{1}\) of children drinking fluoridated water who have decayed teeth is \(67/119\). The corresponding proportion \(p_{2}\) for children drinking unfluoridated water is \(106/143\).
02

Calculate the difference in proportions

Next, find the difference in proportions, \(p_{1} - p_{2}\). This gives the estimated difference in the proportions of children with decayed teeth between those who drink fluoridated and unfluoridated water.
03

Compute Standard Error

The Standard Error (SE) for the difference in proportions estimate can be obtained by the formula: \(SE=\sqrt{\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{1})}{n_{1}}+\frac{p_{2}(1-p_{2})}{n_{2}}}\), where \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\) are the number of observations, in this case the number of children in each community.
04

Find z-value and compute Confidence Interval

For a 90% confidence interval, the z-value will be \(Z=1.645\). This can be found from the standard normal distribution table or a calculator. The formula for confidence interval (CI) is given by: \(CI = (p_{1} - p_{2}) \pm Z*SE\). Now, plug in values to find the confidence interval.
05

Check Zero in Interval and Interpret Result

Now, check the confidence interval for zero. If the confidence interval contains zero, it implies that there is no significant difference between the proportions. Otherwise, one could say there's a significant difference. An interpretation of the interval is then provided.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Proportion in Statistics
In statistics, the term 'proportion' refers to the fraction of the total that possesses a certain attribute or characteristic. It's a measure of how prevalent a certain feature is within a specific group or population. Proportions are widely used in studies to make statements about larger populations based on sample data.

In the exercise example, proportions are used to determine the percentage of children with decayed teeth in communities with and without fluoridated water. By calculating these proportions, we can compare the dental health outcomes of the two different environments. This kind of analysis is critical not only in health studies but in various fields where we compare the occurrences of certain characteristics among groups.

When interpreting proportions, it's crucial to understand that they represent a snapshot based on the sample data at hand. In the given study, the proportions of children with decayed teeth—calculated as the number of children with decayed teeth divided by the total number of children surveyed in each community—serve as estimates for what we might expect in the broader population of similar communities.
Standard Error: Estimating the Variability
Standard Error (SE) is a statistical measure that indicates the accuracy with which a sample represents a population. In simple terms, it's a gauge of how much the sample mean would vary if you drew different samples from the same population.

The standard error of the difference in proportions, as seen in our exercise, tells us how precise our estimate of that difference is. The formula \(SE=\sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}}\) accounts for variability within each group of children—those drinking fluoridated and unfluoridated water. The smaller the standard error, the more reliable our estimated difference in proportion is.

Why is SE important? Because it plays a critical role in constructing confidence intervals and conducting hypothesis tests. Without a reliable SE, we can't trust the accuracy of these intervals or tests. Thus, when interpreting the standard error, comprehension that a smaller SE indicates a more precise estimate is fundamental.
Statistical Significance and Its Relevance
Statistical significance is a determination of whether an observed effect or difference is likely to be genuine or if it could have happened by random chance. This concept is central to hypothesis testing and can provide a strong foundation for making inferences in research.

In the context of our exercise, we're looking at whether the difference in tooth decay between children in communities with and without fluoridated water is statistically significant. After calculating the confidence interval, we check to see if zero is within this interval. If it is not, we infer that the difference in proportions is statistically significant—that is, it's unlikely to be due to just chance alone.

Interpreting the interval is crucial: A confidence interval that doesn't include zero suggests a meaningful difference that could warrant further investigation or action, whereas an interval containing zero might indicate that any observed differences could simply be the result of random variation. Understanding statistical significance allows students and researchers to make better judgments about their data and to draw more accurate conclusions from their studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Some commercial airplanes recirculate approximately \(50 \%\) of the cabin air in order to increase fuel efficiency. The authors of the paper "Aircraft Cabin Air Recirculation and Symptoms of the Common Cold" (Journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: \(483-486\) ) studied 1100 airline passengers who flew from San Francisco to Denver between January and April 1999. Some passengers traveled on airplanes that recirculated air and others traveled on planes that did not recirculate air. Of the 517 passengers who flew on planes that did not recirculate air, 108 reported post-flight respiratory symptoms, while 111 of the 583 passengers on planes that did recirculate air reported such symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of passengers with post-flight respiratory symptoms differs for planes that do and do not recirculate air? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). You may assume that it is reasonable to regard these two samples as being independently selected and as representative of the two populations of interest.

Gender differences in student needs and fears were examined in the article "A Survey of Counseling Needs of Male and Female College Students" (Journal of College Student Development \([1998]: 205-208\) ). Random samples of male and female students were selected from those attending a particular university. Of 234 males surveyed, \(27.5 \%\) said that they were concerned about the possibility of getting AIDS. Of 568 female students surveyed, \(42.7 \%\) reported being concerned about the possibility of getting AIDS. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of female students concerned about the possibility of getting AIDS is greater than the corresponding proportion for males?

An individual can take either a scenic route to work or a nonscenic route. She decides that use of the nonscenic route can be justified only if it reduces true average travel time by more than \(10 \mathrm{~min}\). a. If \(\mu_{1}\) refers to the scenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) to the nonscenic route, what hypotheses should be tested? b. If \(\mu_{1}\) refers to the nonscenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) to the scenic route, what hypotheses should be tested?

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree43 percent versus 25 percent." For purposes of this exercise, suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is higher for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Answer based on a test with a \(.05\) significance level.

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men, Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002 ). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm counts, as compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 nonbikers and that it is reasonable to view these samples as representative of Austrian avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of Austrian avid mountain bikers with low sperm count is higher than the proportion of Austrian nonbikers? b. Based on the outcome of the test in Part (a), is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.