/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 The article "Workaholism in Orga... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Workaholism in Organizations: Gender Differences" (Sex Roles [1999]: \(333-346\) ) gave the following data on 1996 income (in Canadian dollars) for random samples of male and female MBA graduates from a particular Canadian business school: \begin{tabular}{lccc} & \(\boldsymbol{n}\) & \(\boldsymbol{x}\) & \(\boldsymbol{s}\) \\ \hline Males & 258 & \(\$ 133,442\) & \(\$ 131,090\) \\ Females & 233 & \(\$ 105,156\) & \(\$ 98,525\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. For what significance levels would you conclude that the mean salary of female MBA graduates of this business school is above \(\$ 100,000\) ? b. Is there convincing evidence that the mean salary for female MBA graduates of this business school is lower than the mean salary for the male graduates?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solutions to these questions depend on the computed p-values, which may be found using a standard distribution table or statistical software. For a, any significance level greater than this p-value would lead us to conclude that the mean salary of female MBA graduates is above $100,000. On part b, if the p-value is less than the significance level, there is convincing evidence that the mean salary of female MBA graduates of this business school is less than the mean salary of male MBA graduates.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Hypothesis for Part a

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) can be formulated as: The mean salary of female MBA graduates of this business school is equal to $100,000. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is: The mean salary of female MBA graduates of this business school is above $100,000. Mathematically, \(H_0: \mu = \$100,000\) and \(H_1: \mu > \$100,000\).
02

Statistical Calculation for Part a

Compute the test statistic (z) using the formula: \[z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}\] We plug the values from the exercise into this equation, where \(\bar{x} = \$105,156\), \(\mu_0 = \$100,000\), \(s = \$98,525\), and \(n = 233\). Calculate the z-score and find the corresponding p-value from the standard normal distribution table or via computation.
03

Decision for Part a

Using the p-value, compare it with the standard significance level (usually 0.05). If the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. The significance levels at which we would conclude that the mean salary of female MBA graduates is above $100,000 are those greater than the computed p-value.
04

Formulate the Hypothesis for Part b

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the mean salary for female MBA graduates is equal to that of the male graduates. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that the mean salary for female MBA graduates is lower than that of the male graduates. In mathematical notation, \(H_0: \mu_F = \mu_M\) and \(H_1: \mu_F < \mu_M\).
05

Statistical Calculation for Part b

Compute the test statistic using the formula for the hypothesis test of difference between two means (since the standard deviations are known, we will use z-test): \[z = \frac{\bar{x}_F - \bar{x}_M} {\sqrt{\frac{s_F^2}{n_F} + \frac{s_M^2}{n_M}}}\] where \(\bar{x}_F = \$105,156\), \(\bar{x}_M = \$133,442\), \(s_F = \$98,525\), \(s_M = \$131,090\), \(n_F = 233\), and \(n_M = 258\). After finding the z-score, compute the p-value.
06

Decision for Part b

Using the p-value, compare it with the standard significance level (usually 0.05). If the p-value is less than the level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If the p-value is larger than the level of significance, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance Level
When conducting hypothesis tests, the significance level is crucial. It helps researchers decide the threshold for determining if a result is statistically significant. The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. A common \( \alpha \) value used in testing is 0.05. This implies a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference.

Choosing the right significance level depends on the context of the study. For high-stakes testing, like pharmaceuticals, a lower \( \alpha \) level, such as 0.01, might be preferable to reduce the risk of false positives. Conversely, for initial exploratory studies, a higher \( \alpha \) might be used to detect potential effects that warrant further investigation.

Understanding the implication of the significance level assists in interpreting the results. If the computed p-value from the test is less than \( \alpha \), the result is deemed statistically significant, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. This aligns with one of the key tasks in the original exercise: determining the significance levels for conclusions on MBA graduates' salaries.
z-test
The z-test is a statistical test used to determine whether there is a significant difference between sample and population means, or between two sample means, when the variance is known.

For a single sample mean, the z-test formula looks like this:
  • \[ z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} \]
Here, \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu_0\) is the population mean under the null hypothesis, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size.

A z-test assumes that the sample size is sufficiently large or that the underlying distribution is normal. It's commonly used in situations like those in the original exercise, to compare MBA graduates' salaries where large sample sizes make the test robust.

For comparing two sample means, the z-test formula adjusts to account for the sample sizes and standard deviations of both groups, which helps in establishing confidence in the differences observed between groups, such as differences in male and female graduate salaries.
p-value
The p-value is a vital aspect of hypothesis testing that quantifies how much the data support the null hypothesis. It is the probability of observing a sample statistic as extreme as the test statistic, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

When you perform a hypothesis test, you calculate the p-value based on the test statistic, such as the z-score from a z-test. If the p-value is smaller than the chosen significance level \( \alpha \), the evidence is strong enough to reject the null hypothesis. For instance, if \( \alpha \) is set at 0.05 and your p-value is 0.03, you reject the null hypothesis because 0.03 is less than 0.05.

The interpretation of the p-value helps determine the strength of the results, as in the exercise problem where the p-value helped decide whether to conclude variations in salaries among MBA graduates. Thus, even a small p-value, in conjunction with a chosen \( \alpha \), may indicate statistically significant results warranting more in-depth exploration or policy implications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse types ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was computed by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) for each student. The mean difference was reported to be \(8.82\) degrees. Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 24 people as representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 25 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. c. Briefly explain why a different conclusion was reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

A university is interested in evaluating registration processes. Students can register for classes by using either a telephone registration system or an online system that is accessed through the university's web site. Independent random samples of 80 students who registered by phone and 60 students who registered online were selected. Of those who registered by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the registration process. Of those who registered online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is higher for those who register online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

The paper "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children in a National Household Survey" (Pediatrics [2004]: \(112-118\) ) investigated the effect of fast-food consumption on other dietary variables. For a sample of 663 teens who reported that they did not eat fast food during a typical day, the mean daily calorie intake was 2258 and the sample standard deviation was \(1519 .\) For a sample of 413 teens who reported that they did eat fast food on a typical day, the mean calorie intake was 2637 and the standard deviation was 1138 . a. What assumptions about the two samples must be reasonable in order for the use of the two-sample \(t\) confidence interval to be appropriate? b. Use the given information to estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005 , only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size 1112 . Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a 95\% confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men, Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002 ). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm counts, as compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 nonbikers and that it is reasonable to view these samples as representative of Austrian avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of Austrian avid mountain bikers with low sperm count is higher than the proportion of Austrian nonbikers? b. Based on the outcome of the test in Part (a), is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.