/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 The article "Portable MP3 Player... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005 , only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size 1112 . Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a 95\% confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
To provide a precise short answer, the standard error - SE needs to be calculated first. After that one could state the confidence interval and whether zero was included in it or not, and explain what the implications of that are.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Sample Proportions

The number of participants who reported owning an MP3 player in each year can be calculated by multiplying the total sample size (1112) by the respective proportions. For 2005, the number is \(1112 \times 0.15 = 167\) and for 2006, it is \(1112 \times 0.20 = 222\).
02

Estimation of the Difference in Proportions

The difference in the reported proportions between 2005 and 2006 can be estimated as \( p_{2006} - p_{2005} = 0.20 - 0.15 = 0.05\).
03

Calculation of Standard Error

The standard deviation of the difference (standard error) can be estimated using the formula \( SE = \sqrt{ \frac{p_{2005} \times (1 - p_{2005})}{n_{2005}} + \frac{p_{2006} \times (1 - p_{2006})}{n_{2006}} } \). Substituting with the given values, we get \( SE = \sqrt{ \frac{0.15 \times 0.85}{1112} + \frac{0.20 \times 0.80}{1112} } \).
04

Calculation of the 95% Confidence Interval

A 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions can be calculated as \( (p_{2006} - p_{2005}) \pm Z \times SE \), where Z = 1.96, which is the Z score for a 95% confidence interval. Substituting with the estimated values from the earlier steps, we get \( CI = 0.05 \pm 1.96 \times SE \).
05

Interpretation of the Confidence Interval

If zero is not included in the confidence interval, it means that there was a significant change in the proportion of Americans owning MP3 players from 2005 to 2006. If zero is included in the confidence interval, it means that the change was not significant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistics
In the context of the given exercise, statistics provide us with methods and tools to analyze and interpret data. The process begins with data collection, which in this case is the survey of American MP3 player ownership over two different years.

Statistical analysis then enables us to draw conclusions from this data, such as estimating proportions and comparing them across groups or over time. By using statistical techniques, we can infer population trends or preferences based on sample data, such as determining if the popularity of MP3 players has significantly increased from one year to the next. A 95% confidence interval, as used in this exercise, is a key statistical concept which gives us a range in which we can say, with a certain level of confidence, that the true difference in population proportions lies.

If this interval does not include the value zero, we infer that there is a statistically significant difference, indicating a real change in MP3 player ownership between the years studied. Understanding this concept underscores the importance of statistical knowledge in interpreting survey results and making informed decisions or predictions.
Proportion Estimation
Proportion estimation is an essential area of statistics when we deal with categorical data. It involves estimating the proportion of a population that has a specific characteristic, based on sample data. In our exercise example, we estimate the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player based on a sample.

For accurate proportion estimation, the sample must be representative of the population, which is why a random sample is critical. The steps provided in the solution detail calculating the sample proportions and using these to estimate differences. By calculating a confidence interval around this estimated difference, we can measure the reliability of the estimation.

The narrower the confidence interval, the more precise our estimation is considered to be. This precision is influenced by the sample size and the variability within the data. Hence, understanding the principles behind proportion estimation is vital for interpreting and validating the results of data analysis, especially in surveys and studies that use sampling methods.
Data Analysis
Data analysis is the process of systematically applying statistical or logical techniques to describe and illustrate, condense and recap, and evaluate data. In the setting of our problem, data analysis involves estimating population parameters such as the ownership of MP3 players, comparing those estimates across different time points, and determining the significance of the observed changes.

The step-by-step solution we have guides us through calculating the estimated proportion of owners in each year, evaluating the standard error of the difference in proportions (which is a measure of uncertainty in our estimation), and constructing a confidence interval. Analyzing this interval helps us determine whether the difference observed in the sample is likely reflective of a real difference in the wider population.

Data analysis is integral in various fields, not just in statistics but also in business, science, and more. Mastery of data analysis techniques leads to better decision-making based on empirical evidence. In educational contexts, enhancing students’ understanding of data analysis equips them with the ability to critically evaluate and derive meaning from data which is ubiquitous in today’s information-driven world.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The coloration of male guppies may affect the mating preference of the female guppy. To test this hypothesis, scientists first identified two types of guppies, Yarra and Paria, that display different colorations ("Evolutionary Mismatch of Mating Preferences and Male Colour Patterns in Guppies," Animal Behaviour \([1997]: 343-51\) ). The relative area of orange was calculated for fish of each type. A random sample of 30 Yarra guppies resulted in a mean relative area of \(.106\) and a standard deviation of .055. A random sample of 30 Paria guppies resulted in a mean relative area of 178 and a standard deviation \(.058\). Is there evidence of a difference in coloration? Test the relevant hypotheses to determine whether the mean area of orange is different for the two types of guppies.

Samples of both surface soil and subsoil were taken from eight randomly selected agricultural locations in a particular county. The soil samples were analyzed to determine both surface \(\mathrm{pH}\) and subsoil \(\mathrm{pH}\), with the results shown in the accompanying table. \begin{tabular}{lcccccccc} Location & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline Surface pH & \(6.55\) & \(5.98\) & \(5.59\) & \(6.17\) & \(5.92\) & \(6.18\) & \(6.43\) & \(5.68\) \\ Subsoil pH & \(6.78\) & \(6.14\) & \(5.80\) & \(5.91\) & \(6.10\) & \(6.01\) & \(6.18\) & \(5.88\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Compute a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the true average difference between surface and subsoil \(\mathrm{pH}\) for agricultural land in this county. b. What assumptions are necessary to validate the interval in Part (a)?

The article "The Relationship of Task and Ego Orientation to Sportsmanship Attitudes and the Perceived Legitimacy of Injurious Acts" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport [1991]: \(79-87\) ) examined the extent of approval of unsporting play and cheating. High school basketball players completed a questionnaire that was used to arrive at an approval score, with higher scores indicating greater approval. A random sample of 56 male players resulted in a mean approval rating for unsportsmanlike play of \(2.76\), whereas the mean for a random sample of 67 female players was \(2.02 .\) Suppose that the two sample standard deviations were \(.44\) for males and \(.41\) for females. Is it reasonable to conclude that the mean approval rating is higher for male players than for female players by more than .5? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

The article "Religion and Well-Being Among Canadian University Students: The Role of Faith Groups on Campus" (Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion \([1994]: 62-73\) ) compared the self-esteem of students who belonged to Christian clubs and students who did not belong to such groups. Each student in a random sample of \(n=169\) members of Christian groups (the affiliated group) completed a questionnaire designed to measure self-esteem. The same questionnaire was also completed by each student in a random sample of \(n=124\) students who did not belong to a religious club (the unaffiliated group). The mean self-esteem score for the affiliated group was \(25.08\), and the mean for the unaffiliated group was \(24.55 .\) The sample standard deviations weren't given in the article, but suppose that they were 10 for the affiliated group and 8 for the unaffiliated group. Is there evidence that the true mean self- esteem score differs for affiliated and unaffiliated students? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

An electronic implant that stimulates the auditory nerve has been used to restore partial hearing to a number of deaf people. In a study of implant acceptability (Los Angeles Times, January 29,1985 ), 250 adults born deaf and 250 adults who went deaf after learning to speak were followed for a period of time after receiving an implant. Of those deaf from birth, 75 had removed the implant, whereas only 25 of those who went deaf after learning to speak had done so. Does this suggest that the true proportion who remove the implants differs for those that were born deaf and those that went deaf after learning to speak? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.