/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 The coloration of male guppies m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The coloration of male guppies may affect the mating preference of the female guppy. To test this hypothesis, scientists first identified two types of guppies, Yarra and Paria, that display different colorations ("Evolutionary Mismatch of Mating Preferences and Male Colour Patterns in Guppies," Animal Behaviour \([1997]: 343-51\) ). The relative area of orange was calculated for fish of each type. A random sample of 30 Yarra guppies resulted in a mean relative area of \(.106\) and a standard deviation of .055. A random sample of 30 Paria guppies resulted in a mean relative area of 178 and a standard deviation \(.058\). Is there evidence of a difference in coloration? Test the relevant hypotheses to determine whether the mean area of orange is different for the two types of guppies.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The decision of the hypothesis test will depend on the comparison between the calculated test statistic (t) and the critical value from the t-distribution table. The null hypothesis will be rejected if |t|>t-crit, indicating there is evidence of a difference in coloration between Yarra and Paria guppies. If |t|<=t-crit, then the null hypothesis is not rejected, suggesting no significant difference in coloration between the two types of guppies.

Step by step solution

01

State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (H0) is that the mean relative area of orange is the same for both types of guppies. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the mean relative area of orange is not the same for the two types. Mathematically, these can be written as H0: μ1 = μ2 and Ha: μ1 ≠ μ2, where μ1 and μ2 are the population means of Yarra and Paria guppies respectively.
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

The formula for the test statistic for testing the difference in means is:\[ t = \frac{\(x̄1 - x̄2\) - (μ1 - μ2)}{\sqrt{\(s1^2/n1 + s2^2/n2\)}}Where:x̄1 = .106 and x̄2 = .178 are the sample means, μ1 - μ2 = 0 (as per the null hypothesis), s1 = .055 and s2 = .058 are the standard deviations, n1 = n2 = 30 are the sample sizes.Substituting these values into the formula will give the value of t.
03

Find the Critical Value and Make the Decision

The critical values (t-crit) for a two-tailed test at a 5% significance level and degree of freedom (df) = n1 + n2 - 2 = 30 + 30 - 2 = 58, can be looked up from the t-distribution table. If the absolute value of t is greater than t-crit, we reject the null hypothesis. If not, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In the realm of hypothesis testing, two competing hypotheses form the crux of the investigation. The null hypothesis, symbolized as H0, represents the status quo or the assumption that no difference or effect exists. In our guppy coloration study, H0 posits that the mean relative areas of orange on Yarra and Paria guppies are identical.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as Ha or H1, challenges the null by suggesting that a difference or effect does exist. For the guppies, Ha posits that Yarra and Paria guppies have different mean relative areas of orange. The investigation proceeds by assuming the null hypothesis is true and then looking for evidence to either reject it or fail to reject it. It's vital to remember that 'failing to reject' the null does not prove it true, but rather implies insufficient evidence to accept the alternative.
Test Statistic Calculation
Once hypotheses are stated, we move to calculating a test statistic. This is the compass that navigates us through the data's randomness to ascertain if the observations are more extreme than what we'd expect under the null hypothesis.
For the guppy study, the test statistic helps determine if the observed difference in mean coloration is statistically significant or a result of random chance. The formula encapsulates the difference between the sample means, standard deviation, and sample size. A calculated t-value is extracted, which then gets compared to a critical value from the t-distribution. If our test statistic exceeds the critical t-value in absolute terms, it points towards the alternative hypothesis being more plausible.
T-Distribution
The t-distribution is a blueprint for inference when dealing with small or medium-sized samples, especially when the population standard deviation is unknown. It resembles a normal distribution but has thicker tails, meaning that it predicts more variability and is forgiving towards outliers.
In hypothesis testing, the t-distribution table is like a map that demonstrates where our test statistic lies in the landscape of chance results. You can locate the critical values based on your sample's degrees of freedom, which adjusts for sample size. The larger the sample, the more the t-distribution resembles the normal distribution.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance acts as the judge in hypothesis testing, deciding whether the observed data are convincingly unusual under the null hypothesis. Significance is often determined by a p-value, which assesses the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the ones observed during the experiment, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
Conventions in many fields establish a p-value threshold (alpha level), commonly set at 0.05. Crossing this line by obtaining a smaller p-value or a larger test statistic relative to the critical value from the t-distribution, warrants enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In our guppy example, if the test statistic falls into that extreme 5% end of the t-distribution, the data suggests a significant difference in coloration, leading scientists to consider the mating preference hypothesis as viable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree43 percent versus 25 percent." For purposes of this exercise, suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is higher for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Answer based on a test with a \(.05\) significance level.

Are girls less inclined to enroll in science courses than boys? One study ("Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: \(55-76\) ) ?sked randomly selected fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-graders how many science courses they intend to take. The following data were obtained:

The article "Movement and Habitat Use by Lake Whitefish During Spawning in a Boreal Lake: Integrating Acoustic Telemetry and Geographic Information Systems" (Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, [1999]: \(939-952\) ) included the accompanying data on weights of 10 fish caught in 1995 and 10 caught in \(1996 .\) \(\begin{array}{lllllllllll}1995 & 776 & 580 & 539 & 648 & 538 & 891 & 673 & 783 & 571 & 627\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lllllllllll}1996 & 571 & 627 & 727 & 727 & 867 & 1042 & 804 & 832 & 764 & 727\end{array}\) Is it appropriate to use the independent samples \(t\) test to compare the mean weight of fish for the 2 years? Explain why or why not.

The paper "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children in a National Household Survey" (Pediatrics [2004]: \(112-118\) ) investigated the effect of fast-food consumption on other dietary variables. For a sample of 663 teens who reported that they did not eat fast food during a typical day, the mean daily calorie intake was 2258 and the sample standard deviation was \(1519 .\) For a sample of 413 teens who reported that they did eat fast food on a typical day, the mean calorie intake was 2637 and the standard deviation was 1138 . a. What assumptions about the two samples must be reasonable in order for the use of the two-sample \(t\) confidence interval to be appropriate? b. Use the given information to estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

Gender differences in student needs and fears were examined in the article "A Survey of Counseling Needs of Male and Female College Students" (Journal of College Student Development \([1998]: 205-208\) ). Random samples of male and female students were selected from those attending a particular university. Of 234 males surveyed, \(27.5 \%\) said that they were concerned about the possibility of getting AIDS. Of 568 female students surveyed, \(42.7 \%\) reported being concerned about the possibility of getting AIDS. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of female students concerned about the possibility of getting AIDS is greater than the corresponding proportion for males?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.