/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 The article "Movement and Habita... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Movement and Habitat Use by Lake Whitefish During Spawning in a Boreal Lake: Integrating Acoustic Telemetry and Geographic Information Systems" (Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, [1999]: \(939-952\) ) included the accompanying data on weights of 10 fish caught in 1995 and 10 caught in \(1996 .\) \(\begin{array}{lllllllllll}1995 & 776 & 580 & 539 & 648 & 538 & 891 & 673 & 783 & 571 & 627\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lllllllllll}1996 & 571 & 627 & 727 & 727 & 867 & 1042 & 804 & 832 & 764 & 727\end{array}\) Is it appropriate to use the independent samples \(t\) test to compare the mean weight of fish for the 2 years? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Given theoretical considerations, it can be reasonable to use a t-test for comparing the means. However, more rigorous statistical testing or visualization is necessary to definitively assess whether all assumptions (normality, similar variance, independence) are met.

Step by step solution

01

Test for Normality

The first assumption to check for is normality. Ideally, we would do this by plotting the data and visually checking for any skewness or kurtosis. However, as we don't have specific tools to make such graphics here, we'll assume that the dataset is approximately normal.
02

Test for Similar Variance

To decide if the use of a t-test is appropriate, we need to consider if variances are similar in the two samples. Again, ideally, we can use a statistical test like Levene's test to assess if variances are equal or not, but this can not be performed here so we should rely on the assumption of similar variance.
03

Test for Independence

The fish caught in one year does not affect the fish caught in another year. Therefore, we can assume that the observations are independent.
04

Conclude

If the data meet all three these assumptions; normality, similar variances, and independence, then it would be appropriate to use an independent samples t-test to compare the mean weights of fish caught in 1995 and 1996. Without more detailed information and without the possibility of performing formal tests or visualizations, we can't definitively say whether these assumptions are met. Nonetheless, based on theoretical consideration, it seems reasonable to proceed with a t-test in this case.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Test for Normality
Understanding whether a data set is normally distributed is crucial when performing statistical tests, including the independent samples t-test. For the comparison of mean weights of fish from different years, a test for normality helps to ensure that the data doesn't significantly deviate from a bell-shaped distribution, which is a key assumption of many statistical analyses.

Although our example lacks specific graphical tools to check for normality, such as quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots, one can perform Shapiro-Wilk or Anderson-Darling tests as numerical methods. In educational contexts, a rough assessment of normality can also be made by calculating skewness and kurtosis or simply by visual assessment if graphical tools are available. If the data were substantially non-normal, non-parametric tests like the Mann-Whitney U test could be considered as an alternative.
Test for Similar Variance
The assumption of homogeneity of variance, or similar variance, is another pillar for the correct application of an independent samples t-test. This test compares the mean difference between two groups and assumes that the spread or dispersion of scores within each group is roughly equal.

In practice, Levene's test or Bartlett's test can be used to statistically verify this assumption. If the variances are substantially different (a condition referred to as heteroscedasticity), the robustness of the t-test results could be compromised. In such cases, adjustments to the t-test, such as using separate variance estimates or adopting the Welch correction, may be necessary to provide valid results.
Test for Independence
The independency of samples is the backbone of the independent samples t-test. Each value in one sample must not be influenced by the values of the other sample. In our fish weight example, we assume that catching fish in one year does not affect which fish are caught in another year, fulfilling the criterion.

Ensuring the independence of observations is more about study design and less about statistical testing. It's crucial for researchers to collect data in such a manner that the independence assumption is not violated. Otherwise, statistical techniques that accommodate dependent samples, such as paired samples t-tests or repeated measures ANOVA, should be used instead.
Statistical Assumptions
In any statistical test, certain conditions must be met for the results to be considered valid. These are referred to as the statistical assumptions. For the independent samples t-test, the key assumptions include normality, similar variances, and independence of observations, as already mentioned. In addition, the test requires that the samples be randomly selected and that the data come from a continuous scale. Violating these assumptions can lead to incorrect conclusions.

In a teaching context, highlighting the importance of all these statistical assumptions and demonstrating techniques to verify them is essential for helping students understand the robustness and limitations of their statistical findings.
Mean Weight Comparison
At the core of our fish weight example is the mean weight comparison between two independent groups using the t-test. This statistical procedure assesses whether the average weight is significantly different between the two sets of fish from 1995 and 1996. The t-test yields a p-value, which helps determine whether any observed difference in mean weight is statistically significant or likely due to random chance.

If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level (commonly set at 0.05), it would suggest that there are significant weight differences between the fish caught in the two years. It's vital to interpret the results within the biological and ecological context of the study, considering any potential environmental or methodological factors that could influence the fish weights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "So Close, Yet So Far: Predictors of Attrition in College Seniors" (Journal of College Student Development \([1999]: 343-354\) ) attempts to describe differences between college seniors who disenroll before graduating and those who do graduate. Researchers randomly selected 42 nonreturning and 48 returning seniors, none of whom were transfer students. These 90 students rated themselves on personal contact and campus involvement. The resulting data are summarized here: \begin{tabular}{lcccc} & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Returning \((n=48)\)} & & Nonrefurning \((n=42)\) \\ \cline { 2 } \cline { 4 - 5 } & & Standard & & Standard \\ & Mean Deviation & & Mean & Deviation \\ \hline Personal & & & & \\ Contact & \(3.22\) & \(.93\) & & \(2.41\) & \(1.03\) \\ Campus & & & & \\ Involvement & \(3.21\) & \(1.01\) & \(3.31\) & \(1.03\) \\ & & & & \end{tabular} a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean campus involvement rating for returning and nonreturning students. Does your interval support the statement that students who do not return are less involved, on average, than those who do? Explain. b. Do students who don't return have a lower mean personal contact rating than those who do return? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse types ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was computed by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) for each student. The mean difference was reported to be \(8.82\) degrees. Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 24 people as representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Use a \(.05\) significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 25 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{A}\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. c. Briefly explain why a different conclusion was reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

Each person in a random sample of 228 male teenagers and a random sample of 306 female teenagers was asked how many hours he or she spent online in a typical week (Ipsos, January 25,2006 ). The sample mean and standard deviation were \(15.1\) hours and \(11.4\) hours for males and \(14.1\) and \(11.8\) for females. a. The standard deviation for each of the samples is large, indicating a lot of variability in the responses to the question. Explain why it is not reasonable to think that the distribution of responses would be approximately normal for either the population of male teenagers or the population of female teenagers. Hint: The number of hours spent online in a typical week cannot be negative. b. Given your response to Part (a), would it be appropriate to use the two- sample \(t\) test to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the mean number of hours spent online in a typical week for male teenagers and female teenagers? Explain why or why not. c. If appropriate, carry out a test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean number of hours spent online in a typical week is greater for male teenagers than for female teenagers. Use a \(.05\) significance level.

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in 2005 , only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size 1112 . Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a 95\% confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

The authors of the paper "Inadequate Physician Knowledge of the Effects of Diet on Blood Lipids and Lipoproteins" (Nutrition Journal [2003]: 19-26) summarize the responses to a questionnaire on basic knowledge of nutrition that was mailed to 6000 physicians selected at random from a list of physicians licensed in the United States. Sixteen percent of those who received the questionnaire completed and returned it. The authors report that 26 of 120 cardiologists and 222 of 419 internists did not know that carbohydrate was the diet component most likely to raise triglycerides. a. Estimate the difference between the proportion of cardiologists and the proportion of internists who did not know that carbohydrate was the diet component most likely to raise triglycerides using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. b. What potential source of bias might limit your ability to generalize the estimate from Part (a) to the populations of all cardiologists and all internists?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.