/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 65 The article "So Close, Yet So Fa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "So Close, Yet So Far: Predictors of Attrition in College Seniors" (Journal of College Student Development \([1999]: 343-354\) ) attempts to describe differences between college seniors who disenroll before graduating and those who do graduate. Researchers randomly selected 42 nonreturning and 48 returning seniors, none of whom were transfer students. These 90 students rated themselves on personal contact and campus involvement. The resulting data are summarized here: \begin{tabular}{lcccc} & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Returning \((n=48)\)} & & Nonrefurning \((n=42)\) \\ \cline { 2 } \cline { 4 - 5 } & & Standard & & Standard \\ & Mean Deviation & & Mean & Deviation \\ \hline Personal & & & & \\ Contact & \(3.22\) & \(.93\) & & \(2.41\) & \(1.03\) \\ Campus & & & & \\ Involvement & \(3.21\) & \(1.01\) & \(3.31\) & \(1.03\) \\ & & & & \end{tabular} a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean campus involvement rating for returning and nonreturning students. Does your interval support the statement that students who do not return are less involved, on average, than those who do? Explain. b. Do students who don't return have a lower mean personal contact rating than those who do return? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
To provide the short answer, first one should calculate the limits of confidence interval obtained in step 1 and then inform if the confidence interval contains zero or not. If it doesn't contain zero, it suggests that there is a difference in mean campus involvement rating between returning and non-returning students. Then, after performing the test in step 2, one should inform whether the test statistic is greater than the critical value or not. If it is, we reject the null hypothesis and say that students who do not return have a lower mean personal contact rating than those who do return, at the 0.01 level of significance.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate and Interpret the Confidence Interval

First, we calculate the confidence interval. The formula for a confidence interval for the difference between two independent means is: \[CI = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) ± Z \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\] where \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means, \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are the sample standard deviations, and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes. From the data given, we can substitute the values into the formula: \[CI=(3.21-3.31) ± 1.96*sqrt{(\frac{(1.01)^2}{48}+(\frac{(1.03)^2}{42}}\] After solving it, one can get two limits of confidence interval. We interpret the confidence interval and check whether it contains zero. If it doesn't contain zero, there is evidence to suggest that there is a difference in mean campus involvement rating between the two types of students.
02

Perform the Hypothesis Test

The relevant hypotheses here are: \(H_0: \mu_{returning} = \mu_{nonreturning}\), and \(H_1: \mu_{returning} > \mu_{nonreturning}\), where \(\mu_{returning}\) and \(\mu_{nonreturning}\) represent the population mean of personal contact rating for returning and nonreturning students, respectively. The formula for the test statistic is: \[Z = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) / \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\] We substitute the values and calculate Z. Then we compare this to the z score at significance level 0.01 (which is approximately 2.33). If the test statistic is greater than the z score, we reject the null hypothesis.
03

Interpretation

After performing the test, we interpret the result in the context of the problem. If we reject the null hypothesis, it suggests that students who do not return have a lower mean personal contact rating than those who do return.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
Understanding confidence intervals is crucial in statistical analysis. In the context of this exercise, they are used to estimate the range within which the true difference in mean campus involvement ratings between returning and nonreturning students lies.

A confidence interval is calculated using the formula:
  • \[CI = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm Z \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} \]
Here, \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means, \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are their respective standard deviations, and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes.
  • **Z** is the Z-value that corresponds to the desired confidence level, like 1.96 for 95% confidence.
In simple terms, the confidence interval gives a span of plausible values for the difference in means.
If the interval doesn't contain zero, it suggests there's a significant difference between the two groups. In our exercise, by checking if zero falls within the interval, we determine the nature of that difference.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a key method used to make decisions based on data. In this exercise, we're testing whether nonreturning students have lower personal contact ratings than returning students.

We define **two hypotheses**:
  • Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): There is no difference in mean personal contact ratings \((\mu_{returning} = \mu_{nonreturning})\).
  • Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)): Returners have a higher mean rating \((\mu_{returning} > \mu_{nonreturning})\).
To test these, we calculate a test statistic using:
  • \[Z = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) / \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} \]
We compare this **Z-value** with the critical value from the standard normal distribution table, typically at a chosen significance level like 0.01 (critical Z of about 2.33). If our calculated Z is larger, it suggests that the difference is significant enough to reject the null hypothesis.
This means students not returning potentially have lower engagement, as shown by the lower personal contact ratings.
Population Mean
In statistics, the population mean is an average calculated for all members of a group that we are interested in. However, since it's often impractical to measure everyone, samples are used.

In real-world studies like this one, sample means estimate the population mean.
For returning students and nonreturning students, we have specific data that represent their average ratings on various factors like personal contact and campus involvement. The means derived from these ratings provide insights into overall tendencies and behaviors of each student group in the larger population.
Using these sample means, we can infer back to what the true population means might be. This is possible thanks to methods like confidence intervals and hypothesis testing, which allow us to make probabilistic statements about the population based on sample data.
Thus, understanding how sample data reflects the broader population helps researchers draw meaningful conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article referenced in the previous exercise also reported that \(24 \%\) of the males and \(16 \%\) of the females in the 2006 sample reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that there were the same number of males and females in the sample of 1112 . Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of females that owned an MP3 player in 2006 is smaller than the corresponding proportion of males? Carry out a test using a significance level of 01 .

In December 2001, the Department of Veterans Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New York Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately \(1.8\) million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a formal inference procedure (such as the two-sample \(z\) test) and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

British health officials have expressed concern about problems associated with vitamin D deficiency among certain immigrants. Doctors have conjectured that such a deficiency could be related to the amount of fiber in a person's diet. An experiment was designed to compare the vitamin D plasma half-life for two groups of healthy individuals. One group was placed on a normal diet, whereas the second group was placed on a high-fiber diet. The accompanying table gives the resulting data (from "Reduced Plasma Half-Lives of Radio-Labeled \(25(\mathrm{OH}) \mathrm{D} 3\) in Subjects Receiving a High-Fibre Diet," British Journal of Nutrition [1993]: 213-216). \(\begin{array}{lllllll}\text { Normal diet } & 19.1 & 24.0 & 28.6 & 29.7 & 30.0 & 34.8\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllllll}\text { High-fiber diet } & 12.0 & 13.0 & 13.6 & 20.5 & 22.7 & 23.7 & 24.8\end{array}\) Use the following MINITAB output to determine whether the data indicate that the mean half-life is higher for those on a normal diet than those on a high- fiber diet. Assume that treatments were assigned at random and the two plasma half-life distributions are normal. Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01 .\) Two-sample \(\mathrm{T}\) for normal vs high Iw \(\begin{array}{lccrr} & \mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ \text { Normal } & 6 & 27.70 & 5.44 & 2.2 \\ \text { High } & 7 & 18.61 & 5.55 & 2.1\end{array}\) \(5.2\) 15 High \(95 \%\) C.l. for mu normal - mu high: \((2.3,15.9)\) T-Test mu normal = mu high(vs >):T \(=2.97 \mathrm{P}=0.0070 \mathrm{DF}=10\)

In a study of malpractice claims where a settlement had been reached, two random samples were selected: a random sample of 515 closed malpractice claims that were found not to involve medical errors and a random sample of 889 claims that were found to involve errors (New England Journal of Medicine [2006]: 2024-2033). The following statement appeared in the referenced paper: "When claims not involving errors were compensated, payments were significantly lower on average than were payments for claims involving errors \((\$ 313,205\) vs. \(\$ 521,560, P=0.004) . "\) a. What hypotheses must the researchers have tested in order to reach the stated conclusion? b. Which of the following could have been the value of the test statistic for the hypothesis test? Explain your reasoning. i. \(t=5.00\) ii. \(t=2.65\) iii. \(t=2.33\) iv. \(t=1.47\)

The article "A 'White' Name Found to Help in Job Search" (Associated Press, January 15,2003 ) described in experiment to investigate if it helps to have a "whitesounding" first name when looking for a job. Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white- sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black-sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. Resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and resumes of the second type only 167 responses. Do these data support the theory that the proportion receiving positive responses is higher for those resumes with "whitesounding first" names?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.