/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 According to a survey of 1000 ad... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 10: Problem 33

According to a survey of 1000 adult Americans conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 210 of those surveyed said playing the lottery would be the most practical way for them to accumulate \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth in their lifetime ("One in Five Believe Path to Riches Is the Lottery," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 11,2006 ). Although the article does not describe how the sample was selected, for purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be regarded as a random sample of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth?

Short Answer

Expert verified
There isn't convincing evidence, based on this sample, to support the claim that more than 20% of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating $200,000 in net wealth. Our p-value of 0.2148 is greater than the common significance level of 0.05, so we do not reject the null hypothesis of p <= 0.20.

Step by step solution

01

Defining the Null and Alternate Hypothesis

Let's first define the Null Hypothesis (H0) and the Alternate Hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis is that 20% or less of American adults believe the lottery is the best way to accumulate $200,000, i.e., H0: p <= 0.20. The alternate hypothesis is that more than 20% believe that the lottery is the best approach, i.e., Ha: p > 0.20.
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Now, let's calculate the test statistic. The formula for the test statistic in a proportion hypothesis test is z = (p-hat - p0)/sqrt[(p0(1-p0))/n] where p-hat is the sample proportion, p0 is the population proportion under the null hypothesis, and n is the sample size. Here, p-hat = 210/1000 = 0.21, p0 = 0.20, and n = 1000. Substituting these values into the formula gives z = (0.21-0.20)/sqrt[(0.20(1-0.20))/1000] = 0.01/sqrt[0.00016] = 0.01/0.01265 = 0.7905.
03

Compute the P-Value

From the standard normal (Z) distribution table, we can find the probability that Z is more than 0.7905 (the value of our test statistic). However, we want the probability that Z is greater than this, which is 1 - the value we just found. This gives us a p-value of 1 - 0.7852 = 0.2148.
04

Decision

If the p-value is less than the significance level (generally 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. However, here the p-value is 0.2148 which is greater than 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. This means there isn't strong evidence to claim that more than 20% of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating $200,000 in net wealth.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An automobile manufacturer is considering using robots for part of its assembly process. Converting to robots is an expensive process, so it will be undertaken only if there is strong evidence that the proportion of defective installations is lower for the robots than for human assemblers. Let \(\pi\) denote the true proportion of defective installations for the robots. It is known that human assemblers have a defect proportion of 02 . a. Which of the following pairs of hypotheses should the manufacturer test: $$ H_{0}: \pi=.02 \text { versus } H_{s}: \pi<.02 $$ or $$ H_{0}: \pi=.02 \text { versus } H_{a}: \pi>.02 $$ Explain your answer. b. In the context of this exercise, describe Type I and Type II errors. c. Would you prefer a test with \(\alpha=.01\) or \(\alpha=.1 ?\) Explain your reasoning.

A credit bureau analysis of undergraduate students credit records found that the average number of credit cards in an undergraduate's wallet was \(4.09\) ("Undergraduate Students and Credit Cards in 2004," Nellie Mae, May 2005). It was also reported that in a random sample of 132 undergraduates, the sample mean number of credit cards carried was 2.6. The sample standard deviation was not reported, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that it was \(1.2\). Is there convincing evidence that the mean number of credit cards that undergraduates report carrying is less than the credit bureau's figure of \(4.09\) ?

The success of the U.S. census depends on people filling out and returning census forms. Despite extensive advertising, many Americans are skeptical about claims that the Census Bureau will guard the information it collects from other government agencies. In a USA Today poll (March 13,2000 ), only 432 of 1004 adults surveyed said that they believe the Census Bureau when it says the information you give about yourself is kept confidential. Is there convincing evidence that, despite the advertising campaign, fewer than half of U.S. adults believe the Census Bureau will keep information confidential? Use a significance level of \(.01\).

A number of initiatives on the topic of legalized gambling have appeared on state ballots. Suppose that a political candidate has decided to support legalization of casino gambling if he is convinced that more than twothirds of U.S. adults approve of casino gambling. USA Today (June 17,1999 ) reported the results of a Gallup poll in which 1523 adults (selected at random from households with telephones) were asked whether they approved of casino gambling. The number in the sample who approved was 1035 . Does the sample provide convincing evidence that more than two-thirds approve?

Seat belts help prevent injuries in automobile accidents, but they certainly don't offer complete protection in extreme situations. A random sample of 319 front-seat occupants involved in head-on collisions in a certain region resulted in 95 people who sustained no injuries ("Influencing Factors on the Injury Severity of Restrained Front Seat Occupants in Car-to-Car Head-on Collisions," Accident Analysis and Prevention \([1995]: 143-150\) ). Does this suggest that the true (population) proportion of uninjured occupants exceeds .25? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.