/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 Cheaper Airfares Looking for a g... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Cheaper Airfares Looking for a great airfare? Consumer Reports \(^{8}\) has several hints about how to minimize your costs, which include being flexible about travel dates and times, checking multiple websites, and knowing when to book your flight. One suggestion involved checking fares at "secondary" airports - airports that might be slightly farther from your home, but where fares are lower. For example, the average of all domestic ticket prices at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) was quoted as \(\$ 349\) compared to an average price of \(\$ 287\) at nearby Ontario International Airport (ONT). Suppose that these estimates were based on random samples of 1000 domestic tickets at each airport and that the standard deviation of the prices at both airports was \(\$ 200 .\) a. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean ticket prices differ for these two airports at the \(\alpha=\) .05 level of significance? Use the large-sample ztest. What is the \(p\) -value of this test? b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right) .\) Does this interval confirm your conclusions in part a?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Yes, there is sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean ticket prices differ for these two airports as the p-value is less than the level of significance (0.05) and the 95% confidence interval does not contain 0.

Step by step solution

01

State the null and alternative hypothesis

\(H_0 : \mu_1 = \mu_2\) The alternative hypothesis is that the mean ticket prices differ significantly between LAX and ONT: \(H_a : \mu_1 \neq \mu_2\)
02

Perform the large-sample z-test

We use the following z-test formula to calculate the test statistic: \(z = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{(\sigma_1^2)}{n_1} + \frac{(\sigma_2^2)}{n_2}}}\) Given that both airports have a standard deviation of $200 and sample sizes of 1000 domestic tickets: \(z = \frac{(349 - 287) - (0)}{\sqrt{\frac{(200)^2}{1000} + \frac{(200)^2}{1000}}} = 5.18\)
03

Calculate the p-value

Using the z-distribution table, we find the p-value associated with our calculated test statistic: \(p = 2 \times (1 - P(Z \leq 5.18)) \approx 0\) Since the p-value is less than the \(\alpha = 0.05\) level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis, indicating that there is sufficient evidence to believe that the mean ticket prices differ significantly for these two airports. b. Confidence interval:
04

Calculate the margin of error

Using the margin of error formula: \(E = z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{(\sigma_1^2)}{n_1} + \frac{(\sigma_2^2)}{n_2}}\) Using our previously-calculated test statistic, \(z = 5.18\): \(E = 5.18 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{(200)^2}{1000} + \frac{(200)^2}{1000}} = 61.55\)
05

Calculate the confidence interval

Our 95% confidence interval for \((\mu_1 - \mu_2)\) is: \((\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm E = (349 - 287) \pm 61.55 = (62 \pm 61.55)\) The confidence interval is approximately \((0.45, 123.55)\). Since this interval does not contain 0, this confirms our conclusions from the hypothesis test that the mean ticket prices differ significantly for the two airports.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

z-test
The z-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In this case, we're comparing the average ticket prices at two different airports to see if they vary significantly.
  • We start by setting up our hypotheses: the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) suggests no difference in means (\(\mu_1 = \mu_2\)), while the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) proposes a difference (\(\mu_1 eq \mu_2\)).
  • We use the z-test when the standard deviation is known, and the sample size is large (typically \(n > 30\)). This makes the calculation robust.
To perform the z-test, you calculate the z-score, which tells you how many standard deviations away your sample mean is from the null hypothesis mean. For our example, the formula used is:\[z = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{(\sigma_1^2)}{n_1} + \frac{(\sigma_2^2)}{n_2}}}\]Here, \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means, and \(\sigma\) is the known standard deviation, while \(n\) denotes the number of samples.
In this scenario, the calculated z-score is 5.18. This sharp z-value signifies a significant departure from the assumed mean difference of zero, thereby suggesting different prices indeed.
confidence interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference between two population means. It gives us a sense of the precision and reliability of our estimate.
In this example, we're looking at a 95% confidence interval for the difference in ticket prices between LAX and ONT. Here’s how it’s done:
  • Calculate the margin of error (E), using a formula that includes our previous z-value and standard deviation: \(E = z \times \sqrt{\frac{(\sigma_1^2)}{n_1} + \frac{(\sigma_2^2)}{n_2}}\).
  • Next, compute the interval using the sample mean difference and the margin of error: \((\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm E\).
The computed confidence interval from our example is approximately (0.45, 123.55). Because this confidence interval does not include zero, it strengthens our evidence that there is indeed a significant difference in the mean ticket prices between the two airports.
significance level
The significance level, denoted by \(\alpha\), represents the threshold for deciding when to reject the null hypothesis. It is usually set at 0.05, meaning there is a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none.
Choosing \(\alpha = 0.05\) implies that we are willing to accept a 5% chance of mistakenly rejecting a true null hypothesis (committing a Type I error). This level is a standard threshold in many scientific studies.
In the context of our airfare example, our z-test produced a p-value of approximately 0, which is far less than our \(\alpha\) of 0.05. Thus, we confidently reject the null hypothesis and infer that the mean ticket prices at the two airports are significantly different.
p-value
The p-value is a key concept in hypothesis testing that helps us determine the strength of our evidence against the null hypothesis. It tells us the probability of observing our data, or something more extreme, if the null hypothesis were true.
For our airfare case, the p-value is calculated from the z-score, which was found to be 5.18. For such a high z-score, the p-value is essentially zero (or very close to it).
This extremely low p-value indicates that the observed difference in mean prices is highly unlikely to be due to random chance. As a result, we have strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, confirming that the ticket prices at LAX and ONT are indeed different.
  • If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level (\(\alpha = 0.05\)), we reject the null hypothesis.
  • If it is greater than \(\alpha\), we do not reject it.
Since our p-value is significantly lower than 0.05, we have a solid basis to say that the price difference is not coincidental.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Clopidogrel and Aspirin A large study was conducted to test the effectiveness of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin in warding off heart attacks and strokes. \({ }^{15}\) The trial involved more than 15.500 people 45 years of age or older from 32 countries, including the United States, who had been diagnosed with cardiovascular disease or had multiple risk factors. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups. After 2 years, there was no difference in the risk of heart attack, stroke, or dying from heart disease between those who took clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin daily and those who took low-dose aspirin plus a dummy pill. The 2 -drug combination actually increased the risk of dying \((5.4 \%\) versus \(3.8 \%)\) or dying specifically from cardiovascular disease \((3.9 \%\) versus \(2.2 \%\) ). a. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Explain how you could use the random number table to make these assignments. b. No sample sizes were given in the article: however, let us assume that the sample sizes for each group were \(n_{1}=7720\) and \(n_{2}=7780 .\) Determine whether the risk of dying was significantly different for the two groups. c. What do the results of the study mean in terms of practical significance?

A random sample of \(n=1000\) observations from a binomial population produced \(x=279 .\) a. If your research hypothesis is that \(p\) is less than .3 , what should you choose for your alternative hypothesis? Your null hypothesis? b. What is the critical value that determines the rejection region for your test with \(\alpha=.05 ?\) c. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that \(p\) is less than \(.3 ?\) Use a \(5 \%\) significance level.

A Maze Experiment In a maze running study, a rat is run in a T maze and the result of each run recorded. A reward in the form of food is always placed at the right exit. If learning is taking place, the rat will choose the right exit more often than the left. If no learning is taking place, the rat should randomly choose either exit. Suppose that the rat is given \(n=100\) runs in the maze and that he chooses the right exit \(x=64\) times. Would you conclude that learning is taking place? Use the \(p\) -value approach, and make a decision based on this \(p\) -value.

Sweet Potato Whitefly Suppose that \(10 \%\) of the fields in a given agricultural area are infested with the sweet potato whitefly. One hundred fields in this area are randomly selected, and 25 are found to be infested with whitefly. a. Assuming that the experiment satisfies the conditions of the binomial experiment, do the data indicate that the proportion of infested fields is greater than expected? Use the \(p\) -value approach, and test using a \(5 \%\) significance level b. If the proportion of infested fields is found to be significantly greater than .10 , why is this of practical significance to the agronomist? What practical conclusions might she draw from the results?

Treatment versus Control An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of \(50 .\) The first group, the control group, received no treatment for the infection, and the second group received the drug. After a 30 -day period, the proportions of survivors, \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\), in the two groups were found to be .36 and \(.60,\) respectively. a. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the drug is effective in treating the viral infection? Use \(\alpha=05\) b. Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the actual difference in the survival rates for the treated versus the control groups.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.