/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Sweet Potato Whitefly Suppose th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Sweet Potato Whitefly Suppose that \(10 \%\) of the fields in a given agricultural area are infested with the sweet potato whitefly. One hundred fields in this area are randomly selected, and 25 are found to be infested with whitefly. a. Assuming that the experiment satisfies the conditions of the binomial experiment, do the data indicate that the proportion of infested fields is greater than expected? Use the \(p\) -value approach, and test using a \(5 \%\) significance level b. If the proportion of infested fields is found to be significantly greater than .10 , why is this of practical significance to the agronomist? What practical conclusions might she draw from the results?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Yes, there is a significant difference between the expected proportion and the observed proportion of infested fields, as the p-value (0.000004) is less than the 5% significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) states that the proportion of infested fields is equal to 10%, and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) states that the proportion of infested fields is greater than 10%. \(H_0: p = 0.1\) \(H_a: p > 0.1\)
02

Calculate the test statistic

We will use the z-test statistic for a proportion, which is given by the formula: \(z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}}\) where \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion, \(p_0\) is the null hypothesis proportion, and \(n\) is the sample size. In this case, we have: \(\hat{p} = \frac{25}{100} = 0.25\) \(p_0 = 0.1\) \(n = 100\) Calculate the z-test statistic: \(z = \frac{0.25 - 0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{100}}}= 4.47\)
03

Calculate the p-value

The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as the one calculated, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the p-value corresponding to a z-test statistic of 4.47: \(p = P(Z > 4.47) \approx 0.000004\)
04

Compare p-value to the significance level and draw conclusions

Since the p-value (0.000004) is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that the proportion of infested fields is significantly greater than 10%.
05

Explain the practical significance

If the proportion of infested fields is found to be significantly greater than 10%, this is of practical importance to the agronomist because it indicates that the infestation problem is worse than initially thought. This may lead the agronomist to take more aggressive measures to control the spread of whitefly, or to study the factors that led to the higher infestation rate in order to better manage future cases. In conclusion, the agronomist can use this information to make informed decisions about the management of whitefly infestations in the agricultural area.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In statistical hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a foundational concept that acts as a default or starting assumption. In many experiments, including the one described here, it represents the idea that there is no significant effect or difference. In our sweet potato whitefly scenario, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) asserts that the proportion of infested fields is exactly 10%.Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) Highlights:
  • Think of it as "no change" or "nothing unusual happening."
  • In this context, it suggests that any observed infestation proportion is just random variation around the expected 10%.
  • Provides a baseline for comparing actual data.
Learning to construct a null hypothesis is critical because it grounds scientific testing, helping researchers determine whether observed data is significant or just due to chance.
Alternative Hypothesis
Unlike the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis proposes that there is some effect or difference. It is what researchers suspect might be true instead of the null hypothesis. In the whitefly example, the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) suggests that more than 10% of the fields are infested with whiteflies.Key Features of the Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)):
  • It challenges the status quo represented by the null hypothesis.
  • In this case, it indicates that we suspect a larger problem than initially thought.
  • Testing the alternative hypothesis involves looking for evidence that strongly supports this claim over the null hypothesis.
When evidence supports the alternative hypothesis, it can lead to new insights or actions in research, like formulating strategies to address increased infestation levels.
Significance Level
The significance level is a threshold used in hypothesis testing to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. It's denoted by alpha (\(\alpha\)), and in this example, it is set at 5% (0.05). This level represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, which is known as the Type I error.Understanding Significance Level:
  • It's essentially a cut-off point. If the calculated p-value is less than \(\alpha\), the null hypothesis is rejected.
  • Common choices for significance level are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10.
  • Choosing a lower significance level means you're being more stringent about accepting potential findings.
In practical terms, setting the right significance level helps strike a balance between discovering true effects and minimizing false claims of effects.
p-value
The p-value in a hypothesis test tells us the probability of obtaining results as extreme as the observed results, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. A small p-value indicates that such an extreme observed outcome would be very unlikely under the null hypothesis and suggests that the null hypothesis might be false. Important Points About p-value:
  • A smaller p-value points towards evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • In the whitefly example, the p-value of 0.000004 is much lower than the significance level of 0.05, hence, the null hypothesis is rejected.
  • The p-value does not give the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false. It only helps to decide whether the observed data align nicely with the null hypothesis.
Understanding p-values is crucial. They provide a standardized way to express findings from statistical tests and guide decision-making in scientific investigations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Generation Next Born between 1980 and 1990, Generation Next was the topic of Exercise \(8.64 .^{17}\) In a survey of 500 female and 500 male students in Generation Next, 345 of the females and 365 of the males reported that they decided to attend college in order to make more money. a. Is there a significant difference in the population proportions of female and male students who decided to attend college in order to make more money? Use \(\alpha=.01\) b. Can you think of any reason why a statistically significant difference in these population proportions might be of practical importance? To whom might this difference be important?

Early Detection of Breast Cancer Of those women who are diagnosed to have early-stage breast cancer, one-third eventually die of the disease. Suppose a community public health department instituted a screening program to provide for the early detection of breast cancer and to increase the survival rate \(p\) of those diagnosed to have the disease. A random sample of 200 women was selected from among those who were periodically screened by the program and who were diagnosed to have the disease. Let \(x\) represent the number of those in the sample who survive the disease. a. If you wish to determine whether the community screening program has been effective, state the alternative hypothesis that should be tested. b. State the null hypothesis. c. If 164 women in the sample of 200 survive the disease, can you conclude that the community screening program was effective? Test using \(\alpha=.05\) and explain the practical conclusions from your test.

Washing Machine Colors A manufacturer of automatic washers provides a particular model in one of three colors. Of the first 1000 washers sold, it is noted that 400 were of the first color. Can you conclude that more than one- third of all customers have a preference for the first color? a. Find the \(p\) -value for the test. b. If you plan to conduct your test using \(\alpha=.05\), what will be your test conclusions?

Increased Yield An agronomist has shown experimentally that a new irrigation/fertilization regimen produces an increase of 2 bushels per quadrat (significant at the \(1 \%\) level) when compared with the regimen currently in use. The cost of implementing and using the new regimen will not be a factor if the increase in yield exceeds 3 bushels per quadrat. Is statistical significance the same as practical importance in this situation? Explain.

Invasive Species In a study of the pernicious giant hogweed, Jan Pergl \(^{1}\) and associates compared the density of these plants in two different sites within the Caucasus region of Russia. In its native area, the average density was found to be 5 plants/m \(^{2}\). In an invaded area in the Czech Republic, a sample of \(n=50\) plants produced an average density of 11.17 plants/m \(^{2}\) with a standard deviation of 3.9 plants \(/ \mathrm{m}^{2}\) a. Does the invaded area in the Czech Republic have an average density of giant hogweed that is different from \(\mu=5\) at the \(\alpha=.05\) level of significance? b. What is the \(p\) -value associated with the test in part a? Can you reject \(H_{0}\) at the \(5 \%\) level of significance using the \(p\) -value?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.