Chapter 16: Problem 5
Provide three reasons for allocating joint costs to individual products or services.
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 16: Problem 5
Provide three reasons for allocating joint costs to individual products or services.
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Earl's Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately \(\$ 9,000\) in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for \(\$ 20,000\) while \(B\) grade sells for \(\$ 40,000\). After an additional investment of \(\$ 10,000\) after splitoff, \(\$ 3,000\) for \(B\) grade and \(\$ 7,000\) for \(A-1,\) both the products sell for \(\$ 50,000\) What is the difference in allocated costs for the \(A-1\) product assuming applications of the net realizable value and the net realizable value at splitoff approach? 1\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 2\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 3\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 4\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
SW Flour Company buys 1 input of standard flour and refines it using a special sifting process to 3 cups of baking flour and 9 cups of bread flour. In May \(2017,\) SW bought 12,000 inputs of flour for \(\$ 89,000 .\) SW spent another \(\$ 47,800\) on the special sifting process. The baking flour can be sold for \(\$ 3.60\) per cup and the bread flour for \(\$ 4.80\) per cup. SW puts the baking flour through a second process so it is super fine. This costs an additional \(\$ 1.00\) per cup of baking flour and the process yields \(1 / 2\) cup of super-fine baking flour for every one cup of baking flour used. The super-fine baking flour sells for \(\$ 9.60\) per cup. 1\. Allocate the \(\$ 136,800\) joint cost to the super-fine baking flour and the bread flour using the following: a. Physical-measure method (using cups) of joint-cost allocation b. Sales value at splitoff method of joint-cost allocation c. \(\mathrm{NRV}\) method of joint-cost allocation d. Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method of joint-cost allocation 2\. Each of these measures has advantages and disadvantages; what are they? 3\. Some claim that the sales value at splitoff method is the best method to use. Discuss the logic behind this claim.
Why might managers seeking a monthly bonus based on attaining a target operating income prefer the sales method of accounting for byproducts rather than the production method?
The Tempura Spirits Company produces two products-methanol (wood alcohol) and turpentine- by a joint process. Joint costs amount to \(\$ 124,000\) per batch of output. Each batch totals 9,500 gallons: \(25 \%\) methanol and \(75 \%\) turpentine. Both products are processed further without gain or loss in volume. Separable processing costs are methanol, \(\$ 4\) per gallon, and turpentine, \(\$ 2\) per gallon. Methanol sells for \(\$ 22\) per gallon. Turpentine sells for \(\$ 16\) per gallon. 1\. How much of the joint costs per batch will be allocated to methanol and to turpentine, assuming that joint costs are allocated based on the number of gallons at splitoff point? 2\. If joint costs are allocated on an NRV basis, how much of the joint costs will be allocated to methanol and to turpentine? 3\. Prepare product-line income statements per batch for requirements 1 and 2 . Assume no beginning or ending inventories. 4\. The company has discovered an additional process by which the methanol (wood alcohol) can be made into a pleasant-tasting alcoholic beverage. The selling price of this beverage would be \(\$ 55\) a galIon. Additional processing would increase separable costs \(\$ 12\) per gallon (in addition to the \(\$ 4\) per \(g\) alIon separable cost required to yield methanol). The company would have to pay excise taxes of \(20 \%\) on the selling price of the beverage. Assuming no other changes in cost, what is the joint cost applicable to the wood alcohol (using the NRV method)? Should the company produce the alcoholic beverage? Show your computations.
Why is the constant gross-margin percentage NRV method sometimes called a "joint-cost-allocation and a profit-allocation" method?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.