/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Earl's Hurricane Lamp Oil Compan... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Earl's Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately \(\$ 9,000\) in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for \(\$ 20,000\) while \(B\) grade sells for \(\$ 40,000\). After an additional investment of \(\$ 10,000\) after splitoff, \(\$ 3,000\) for \(B\) grade and \(\$ 7,000\) for \(A-1,\) both the products sell for \(\$ 50,000\) What is the difference in allocated costs for the \(A-1\) product assuming applications of the net realizable value and the net realizable value at splitoff approach? 1\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 2\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 3\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 4\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A-1 Fancy has \$ 1,300 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate cost allocations under the sales value at splitoff approach

To calculate the cost allocation under the sales value at splitoff approach, we need to follow these steps: 1. Calculate the combined sales value of both A-1 Fancy and B Grade before splitoff. 2. Calculate the cost allocation ratios for A-1 Fancy and B Grade. 3. Allocate the joint costs based on the ratios calculated. Let's perform these calculations 1. Combined sales value before splitoff: \(Combined\,Sales\,Value = Sales\,Value_{A-1\,Fancy} + Sales\,Value_{B\,Grade} = \$ 20,000 + \$ 40,000 = \$ 60,000\) 2. Calculate cost allocation ratios: Ratio for A-1 Fancy: \(\frac{\$20,000}{\$60,000} = \frac{1}{3}\) Ratio for B Grade: \(\frac{\$40,000}{\$60,000} = \frac{2}{3}\) 3. Allocate the joint costs based on the ratios calculated: \(Joint\,Cost_{A-1\,Fancy} = Joint\,Cost * Ratio_{A-1\_Fancy} = \$ 9,000 * \frac{1}{3} = \$ 3,000\) \(Joint\,Cost_{B\,Grade} = Joint\,Cost * Ratio_{B\_Grade} = \$ 9,000 * \frac{2}{3} = \$ 6,000\)
02

Calculate cost allocations under the net realizable value approach

To calculate cost allocation under the net realizable value approach, we need to follow these steps: 1. Calculate the net realizable value of both A-1 Fancy and B Grade. 2. Calculate the cost allocation ratios for A-1 Fancy and B Grade. 3. Allocate the joint costs based on the ratios calculated. 1. Calculate net realizable value: Net realizable value for A-1 Fancy: \(\$50,000 - \$ 7,000 = \$ 43,000\), Net realizable value for B Grade: \(\$50,000 - \$ 3,000 = \$ 47,000\) 2. Calculate cost allocation ratios: Ratio for A-1 Fancy: \(\frac{\$43,000}{\$90,000} = \frac{43}{90}\) Ratio for B Grade: \(\frac{\$47,000}{\$90,000} = \frac{47}{90}\) 3. Allocate the joint costs based on the ratios calculated: \(Joint\,Cost_{A-1\,Fancy} = Joint\,Cost * Ratio_{A-1\_Fancy} = \$ 9,000 * \frac{43}{90} = \$ 4300\) \(Joint\,Cost_{B\,Grade} = Joint\,Cost * Ratio_{B\_Grade} = \$ 9,000 * \frac{47}{90} = \$ 4700\)
03

Determine the difference in allocated costs for A-1 Fancy

We will now find the difference in allocated costs for A-1 Fancy using the sales value at splitoff approach and the net realizable value approach. Difference: \(\$ 4,300 - \$ 3,000= \$ 1,300\) This means A-1 Fancy has $1,300 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. Hence, the correct answer is option 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Net Realizable Value Approach
The net realizable value (NRV) approach is a cost allocation method that focuses on the final value of products after additional processing. It considers the potential revenue from each product minus any additional costs incurred after the splitoff point. By evaluating the estimated selling price and subtracting further processing costs, it provides a clearer picture of each product's profitability.

To allocate joint costs using the NRV approach:
  • First, determine the net realizable value for each product. This involves subtracting the additional costs from the final sales price. For instance, A-1 Fancy's net realizable value is calculated as \(50,000 (final sales price) minus \)7,000 (additional costs), resulting in \(43,000.
  • Next, calculate the proportion of NRV each product contributes to the total NRV. For A-1 Fancy and B Grade, the total NRV combined is \)90,000, with A-1 contributing \(43,000 and B Grade \)47,000.
  • Allocate the \(9,000 joint costs based on these proportions. A-1's share is \)4,300, calculated as \((43,000/90,000) \times 9,000\).
This method is particularly useful if the focus is on maximizing profitability post-processing.
Sales Value at Splitoff Approach
The sales value at splitoff approach is another method used to allocate joint costs. This approach relies on the immediate sales value of products at the point of separation, without considering further processing.

Using this method involves:
  • Calculating the total sales value at the splitoff point by summing up the sales values of all products before further processing. For example, A-1 Fancy has a sales value of \(20,000, while B Grade has \)40,000, making the combined sales value \(60,000.
  • Determining each product's proportion of the total sales value. A-1 Fancy contributes \)20,000, which is one-third of the total, and B Grade contributes two-thirds.
  • Allocating the joint costs based on these proportions. For A-1, this is \((1/3) \times 9,000\), which equals $3,000.
This approach is straightforward and reflects the products' initial market values, making it useful when further processing is not a focus.
Joint Costs
Joint costs arise in production processes where multiple products are derived from a single initial input. These costs are incurred before the splitoff point, where the products become individually identifiable.

Understanding joint costs is crucial because:
  • It helps in understanding shared production costs that impact multiple products. These costs can include direct materials, labor, and overhead that cannot be individually assigned to specific products.
  • Allocating these costs accurately is essential for evaluating product profitability and making informed business decisions.
  • The methods of allocation, such as the NRV approach and the sales value at splitoff approach, offer different perspectives and can significantly influence how costs are distributed across products.
Proper allocation of joint costs ensures that companies are accurately tracking product performance and making strategic pricing, production, and marketing decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Joint-cost allocation, insurance settlement. Quality Chicken grows and processes chickens. Each chicken is disassembled into five main parts. Information pertaining to production in July 2017 is as follows: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & & \text { Wholesale Selling Price per Pound When } \\\\\text { Parts } & \text { Pounds of Product } & \text { Production Is Complete } \\\\\hline \text { Breasts } & 100 & \$ 0.55 \\\\\text { Wings } & 20 & 0.20 \\\\\text { Thighs } & 40 & 0.35 \\\\\text { Bones } & 80 & 0.10 \\\\\text { Feathers } & 10 & 0.05\end{array}$$ Joint cost of production in July 2017 was \(\$ 50\) A special shipment of 40 pounds of breasts and 15 pounds of wings has been destroyed in a fire. Quality Chicken's insurance policy provides reimbursement for the cost of the items destroyed. The insurance company permits Quality Chicken to use a joint-cost- allocation method. The splitoff point is assumed to be at the end of the production process. 1\. Compute the cost of the special shipment destroyed using the following: a. Sales value at splitoff method b. Physical-measure method (pounds of finished product) 2\. What joint-cost-allocation method would you recommend Quality Chicken use? Explain.

Joint costs of \(\$ 8,000\) are incurred to process \(X\) and \(Y\). Upon splitoff, \(\$ 4,000\) and \(\$ 6,000\) in costs are incurred to produce 200 units of \(X\) and 150 units of \(Y\), respectively. In order to justify processing further at the splitoff point, revenues for product: a. \(X\) must exceed \(\$ 12,000\) b. \(Y\) must exceed \(\$ 14,000\). c. \(X\) must be greater than \(\$ 60\) per unit. d. \(Y\) must be greater than \(\$ 40\) per unit.

Why might managers seeking a monthly bonus based on attaining a target operating income prefer the sales method of accounting for byproducts rather than the production method?

(CMA, adapted) Liverpool Sawmill, Inc. (LSI) purchases logs from independent timber contractors and processes the logs into three types of lumber products: \(\bullet\) Studs for residential buildings (walls, ceilings) \(\bullet\) Decorative pieces (fireplace mantels, beams for cathedral ceilings) \(\bullet\) Posts used as support braces (mine support braces, braces for exterior fences on ranch properties) These products are the result of a joint sawmill process that involves removal of bark from the logs, cutting the logs into a workable size (ranging from 8 to 16 feet in length), and then cutting the individual products from the logs. The joint process results in the following costs of products for a typical month: Product yields and average sales values on a per-unit basis from the joint process are as follows: The studs are sold as rough-cut lumber after emerging from the sawmill operation without further processing by LSI. Also, the posts require no further processing beyond the splitoff point. The decorative pieces must be planed and further sized after emerging from the sawmill. This additional processing costs \(\$ 90,000\) per month and normally results in a loss of \(10 \%\) of the units entering the process. Without this planing and sizing process, there is still an active intermediate market for the unfinished decorative pieces in which the selling price averages \(\$ 55\) per unit. 1\. Based on the information given for Liverpool Sawmill, allocate the joint processing costs of \(\$ 1,010,000\) to the three products using: a. Sales value at splitoff method b. Physical-measure method (volume in units) c. \(\mathrm{NRV}\) method 2\. Prepare an analysis for Liverpool Sawmill that compares processing the decorative pieces further, as it currently does, with selling them as a rough- cut product immediately at splitoff. 3\. Assume Liverpool Sawmill announced that in six months it will sell the unfinished decorative pieces at splitoff due to increasing competitive pressure. Identify at least three types of likely behavior that will be demonstrated by the skilled labor in the planing-and-sizing process as a result of this announcement. Include in your discussion how this behavior could be influenced by management.

Why might the number of products in a joint-cost situation differ from the number of outputs? Give an example.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.