/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Why might managers seeking a mon... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Why might managers seeking a monthly bonus based on attaining a target operating income prefer the sales method of accounting for byproducts rather than the production method?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Managers seeking a monthly bonus based on attaining a target operating income might prefer the sales method of accounting for byproducts because it reduces the production cost of the main product, leading to an increase in operating income. The sales method directly impacts the operating income, bringing the manager closer to their target and potentially earning them a bonus, while the production method does not have the same effect.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the sales method of accounting for byproducts

In the sales method, the revenue generated from the sale of byproducts is used to reduce the production cost of the main product. This results in a decrease in the total production cost, which can increase the profit margin and, subsequently, the operating income.
02

Understanding the production method of accounting for byproducts

The production method treats byproducts as separate, individual products. Revenue from the sale of byproducts is recorded in a separate account, and it does not affect the production cost of the main product. As a result, this method does not have any direct impact on the operating income of the main product.
03

Evaluating the impact on operating income

Managers seeking a monthly bonus based on attaining a target operating income would prefer the sales method because it has a direct impact on the operating income. By reducing the production cost of the main product, the sales method increases the operating income, bringing the manager closer to the target and, potentially, earning them a bonus.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, managers seeking a monthly bonus based on attaining a target operating income would prefer the sales method of accounting for byproducts because it reduces the total production cost of the main product, increases the operating income, and brings them closer to their desired bonus. The production method, on the other hand, does not directly impact the operating income and is, therefore, less desirable for managers with this goal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Byproduct Accounting
Byproduct accounting is an aspect of cost accounting where companies deal with secondary products generated during the manufacturing of primary products. These secondary products are called byproducts. Accounting for byproducts helps businesses understand how to recognize the revenues generated from byproducts and how they affect overall profitability.
The key to byproduct accounting is deciding how to account for the additional income they bring, which can significantly alter financial statements depending on the method chosen. The two main methods for accounting for byproducts are the Sales Method and the Production Method. Each has its implications, particularly on financial metrics like operating income.
Operating Income
Operating income reflects a company's profit from its core business operations, excluding deductions like taxes and interest. It serves as a measure of the efficiency with which a company manages its resources, as it indicates the profit generated from the main activities.
Incentives for managers, such as monthly bonuses, often hinge on reaching targets for operating income. As such, changes in byproduct accounting can impact operating income, thereby influencing managerial decisions.
  • A higher operating income signifies stronger operational profitability.
  • Managers might seek methods to optimize operating income to achieve performance bonuses.
  • Adjustments in byproduct accounting approaches can affect this bottom line, either increasing or stabilizing it depending on the method used.
Understanding how different accounting methods impact this metric is crucial for strategic decision-making.
Sales Method
The Sales Method of byproduct accounting involves using the revenue from byproducts to directly reduce the overall production cost of the main product. This method impacts the income statement by enhancing the apparent profitability of the primary operations.
Here's why managers might prefer this approach:
  • Reduction in production costs reflected immediately on financial statements.
  • Enhanced operating income without altering actual sales of the main product.
  • Appeals to managers seeking to meet specific financial targets or bonuses within a fiscal period.
This method smoothens financial performance by instantly realizing gains from byproduct sales, effectively bolstering the financial health of the company's primary operations.
Production Method
The Production Method treats byproducts as distinct, separate products with their profit computations. This method records byproduct sales in separate accounts rather than reducing the overall production costs of the main product.
Features of this method include:
  • Separate tracking of main product and byproduct revenues.
  • Clear differentiation in financial reports between main and secondary products.
  • No direct reduction in the primary product's production costs.
Although this method provides detailed insights into the profitability of each product, it does not affect the operating income as directly as the Sales Method. Managers focused on achieving specific operating income targets might find this approach less attractive when bonuses or performance metrics are tied to operational profitability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Garden Labs produces a drug used for the treatment of arthritis. The drug is produced in batches. Chemicals costing \(\$ 50,000\) are mixed and heated, then a unique separation process extracts the drug from the mixture. A batch yields a total of 3,000 gallons of the chemicals. The first 2,500 gallons are sold for human use while the last 500 gallons, which contain impurities, are sold to veterinarians. The costs of mixing, heating, and extracting the drug amount to \(\$ 155,000\) per batch. The output sold for human use is pasteurized at a total cost of \(\$ 130,000\) and is sold for \(\$ 600\) per gallon. The product sold to veterinarians is irradiated at a cost of \(\$ 20\) per gallon and is sold for \(\$ 450\) per gallon. In March, Garden, which had no opening inventory, processed one batch of chemicals. It sold 2,000 gallons of product for human use and 300 gallons of the veterinarian product. Garden uses the net realizable value method for allocating joint production costs. 1\. How much in joint costs does Garden allocate to each product? 2\. Compute the cost of ending inventory for each of Garden's products. 3\. If Garden were to use the constant gross-margin percentage NRV method instead, how would it allocate its joint costs? 4\. Calculate the gross margin on the sale of the product for human use in March under the constant gross-margin percentage NRV method. 5\. Suppose that the separation process also yields 300 pints of a toxic byproduct. Garden currently pays a hauling company \(\$ 6,000\) to dispose of this byproduct. Garden is contacted by a firm interested in purchasing a modified form of this byproduct for a total price of \(\$ 7,000\). Garden estimates that it will cost about \(\$ 35\) per pint to do the required modification. Should Garden accept the offer?

'Managers must decide whether a product should be sold at splitoff or processed further. The sales value at splitoff method of joint-cost allocation is the best method for generating the information managers need for this decision." Do you agree? Explain.

The Tempura Spirits Company produces two products-methanol (wood alcohol) and turpentine- by a joint process. Joint costs amount to \(\$ 124,000\) per batch of output. Each batch totals 9,500 gallons: \(25 \%\) methanol and \(75 \%\) turpentine. Both products are processed further without gain or loss in volume. Separable processing costs are methanol, \(\$ 4\) per gallon, and turpentine, \(\$ 2\) per gallon. Methanol sells for \(\$ 22\) per gallon. Turpentine sells for \(\$ 16\) per gallon. 1\. How much of the joint costs per batch will be allocated to methanol and to turpentine, assuming that joint costs are allocated based on the number of gallons at splitoff point? 2\. If joint costs are allocated on an NRV basis, how much of the joint costs will be allocated to methanol and to turpentine? 3\. Prepare product-line income statements per batch for requirements 1 and 2 . Assume no beginning or ending inventories. 4\. The company has discovered an additional process by which the methanol (wood alcohol) can be made into a pleasant-tasting alcoholic beverage. The selling price of this beverage would be \(\$ 55\) a galIon. Additional processing would increase separable costs \(\$ 12\) per gallon (in addition to the \(\$ 4\) per \(g\) alIon separable cost required to yield methanol). The company would have to pay excise taxes of \(20 \%\) on the selling price of the beverage. Assuming no other changes in cost, what is the joint cost applicable to the wood alcohol (using the NRV method)? Should the company produce the alcoholic beverage? Show your computations.

(CMA, adapted) Newcastle Mining Company (NMC) mines coal, puts it through a one-step crushing process, and loads the bulk raw coal onto river barges for shipment to customers. NMC's management is currently evaluating the possibility of further processing the raw coal by sizing and cleaning it and selling it to an expanded set of customers at higher prices. The option of building a new sizing and cleaning plant is ruled out as being financially infeasible. Instead, Amy Kimbell, a mining engineer, is asked to explore outside-contracting arrangements for the cleaning and sizing process. Kimbell puts together the following summary: Kimbell also learns that \(75 \%\) of the material loss that occurs in the cleaning and sizing process can be salvaged as coal fines, which can be sold to steel manufacturers for their furnaces. The sale of coal fines is erratic and NMC may need to stockpile them in a protected area for up to one year. The selling price of coal fines ranges from \(\$ 14\) to \(\$ 25\) per ton and costs of preparing coal fines for sale range from \(\$ 3\) to \(\$ 5\) per ton. 1\. Prepare an analysis to show whether it is more profitable for NMC to continue selling raw bulk coal or to process it further through sizing and cleaning. (Ignore coal fines in your analysis.) 2\. How would your analysis be affected if the cost of producing raw coal could be held down to \(\$ 20\) per ton? 3\. Now consider the potential value of the coal fines and prepare an addendum that shows how their value affects the results of your analysis prepared in requirement 1.

Earl's Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately \(\$ 9,000\) in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for \(\$ 20,000\) while \(B\) grade sells for \(\$ 40,000\). After an additional investment of \(\$ 10,000\) after splitoff, \(\$ 3,000\) for \(B\) grade and \(\$ 7,000\) for \(A-1,\) both the products sell for \(\$ 50,000\) What is the difference in allocated costs for the \(A-1\) product assuming applications of the net realizable value and the net realizable value at splitoff approach? 1\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 2\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 3\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 4\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.