/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 97 It is fairly well known that per... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

It is fairly well known that perception of weight by adolescents does not always agree with actual weight. What is less clear is whether perception of weight differs by gender. For this purpose, a study was performed among students in a local high school, where students provided their actual height and weight by self-report. The following data were obtained from 286 students \((143 \text { boys and } 143\) girls). (The data for this problem were provided by Laura Rosner.) The students were classified as underweight if their bodymass index (BMI) \(\left(\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\) was less than \(18.0 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\), as normal if their BMI was \(\geq 18.0\) and \(<25.0,\) and overweight if their BMI was \(\geq 25.0\). Based on these criteria, 17 of the girls were underweight, 113 were of normal weight, and 13 were overweight. For the boys, 7 were underweight, 115 were of normal weight, and 21 were overweight. What test procedure can be used to assess whether the weight status of boys significantly differs from girls?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use a Chi-square test for independence to assess weight status differences between boys and girls.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

The exercise involves comparing weight perception and actual weight by gender, specifically using Body Mass Index (BMI) data for 143 boys and 143 girls. We need to determine if there is a significant difference in weight status between the genders, classified as underweight, normal, or overweight.
02

Data Summarization

The data is categorized based on BMI: underweight (<18.0 kg/m²), normal (18.0 to <25.0 kg/m²), and overweight (≥25.0 kg/m²). For girls: 17 are underweight, 113 are normal, and 13 are overweight. For boys: 7 are underweight, 115 are normal, and 21 are overweight.
03

Selecting the Test

To assess differences in categorical distribution of weight status between boys and girls, we should use a Chi-square test for independence. This test evaluates if there is a significant association between two categorical variables—in this case, gender and weight status.
04

Setting Up Hypotheses

Formulate the null hypothesis as: 'There is no significant difference in the distribution of weight status between boys and girls.' The alternative hypothesis would be: 'There is a significant difference in the distribution of weight status between boys and girls.'
05

Executing the Test

Perform the Chi-square test by calculating expected frequencies for each category, then use these to determine the Chi-square statistic. Compare this statistic to a critical value from the Chi-square distribution table, or use software to find the p-value.
06

Interpretation of Results

If the p-value is less than the significance level (usually 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference in weight status distribution between boys and girls. If the p-value is greater, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index, commonly known as BMI, is a simple calculation used to assess whether a person's weight is appropriate for their height. It is calculated using the formula:\[BMI = \frac{\text{weight in kilograms}}{(\text{height in meters})^2}\] BMI is widely used because it's easy to measure and provides quick insights into whether someone falls into categories like underweight, normal weight, or overweight. These categories help indicate potential health risks related to weight.
  • Underweight: BMI is less than 18.0 kg/m².
  • Normal: BMI is between 18.0 and 24.9 kg/m².
  • Overweight: BMI is 25.0 kg/m² or higher.
For example, in the study, students were classified based on their BMI, allowing researchers to analyze weight categories effectively. While BMI is useful, it's important to remember that it does not directly measure body fat or account for muscle mass, which can affect interpretation.
gender differences
In many areas of health and social science, researchers are interested in exploring gender differences. This is because men and women can have different physiological and psychological characteristics that impact health differently. In the context of BMI and weight perception, gender differences may manifest in how males and females perceive their weight or respond to weight categories. For instance, societal norms and expectations often influence how body image and weight are perceived across genders. This is crucial when evaluating BMI data as it may affect both the reporting and interpretation of weight-related information. In the exercise, researchers used BMI data from boys and girls to see if there was a distinct pattern or discrepancy between the genders in terms of weight classification. Recognizing these differences can help in designing better health interventions and policies that cater specifically to the needs of different genders.
hypothesis testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make inferences or draw conclusions about a population based on sample data. It begins with formulating two hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): This is a statement of no effect or no difference. In our exercise, it states there is no significant difference in weight status between boys and girls.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): This suggests a significant effect or difference exists. Here, it posits a significant difference in weight status between genders.
After formulating these hypotheses, a statistical test, like the Chi-square test for independence, is conducted. This test assesses whether there is an association between two categorical variables (e.g., gender and weight status).During the test, expected frequencies are calculated under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. The Chi-square statistic is then calculated using these expected values and the observed data. The result is compared to a critical value from the Chi-square distribution or a p-value is computed.
  • If the p-value is less than a pre-determined significance level (commonly 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected, suggesting a significant difference exists.
  • If the p-value is greater, the null hypothesis is not rejected, implying no significant difference was detected.
Hypothesis testing is a powerful tool, helping convert data into actionable insights by quantitatively underscoring distinctions or similarities within a study.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Aminoglycosides are powerful broad-spectrum antibiotics used for gram-negative infections often in seriously ill patients. For example, the drugs are often prescribed for drug-resistant tuberculosis as recommended by the World Health Organization. However, these drugs have serious side effects, including irreversible hearing loss referred to as ototoxicity. The most commonly prescribed aminoglycoside is gentamicin. A clinical trial was set up in China to assess whether the addition of aspirin to a standard regimen of gentamicin would have an effect on the incidence of ototoxicity [28]. There were 195 patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Of these, 106 patients were randomized to a twice daily regimen of \(80-160\) mg of gentamicin plus placebo and 89 patients were randomized to receive the same regimen of gentamicin \(+3 \mathrm{g}\) of aspirin (ASA) daily. (i) What is a prospective study? What are its advantages? (ii) What is a randomized study? What are its advantages? (iii) What is a double-blind study? Are there advantages vs. other approaches? After 2 weeks of treatment, 14 of the placebo patients and 3 of the ASA patients developed clinically significant hearing loss.

A study was performed among patients with progressive chronic kidney disease to assess the optimal time for the initiation of dialysis (Cooper et al. [22]). Patients were randomized to either i. an early start group, where dialysis was initiated when their estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was between 10.0 and \(15.0 \mathrm{mL}\) per minute per \(1.73 \mathrm{m}^{2}\) of body surface area or ii. a late start group, where dialysis was initiated when their GFR was 5.0 to \(7.0 \mathrm{mL}\) per minute per \(1.73 \mathrm{m}^{2}\) of body surface area.The primary outcome was total mortality. There were 404 patients assigned to the early start group, of whom 152 died. There were 424 patients assigned to the late start group, of whom 155 died over the same time period. Patients were enrolled from July 2000 to November 2008 and were followed for 3 years. What test can be used to compare the mortality rates in the two groups?

A common assumption is that the gender distributions of successive offspring are independent. To test this assumption, birth records were collected from the first 5 births in 51,868 families. For families with exactly 5 children, Table 10.35 shows a frequency distribution of the number of male offs pring (from Data Set SEXRAT.DAT; see p. 110). Suppose the investigators doubt the probability of a male birth is exactly \(50 \%\) but are willing to assume the gender distributions of successive offspring are independent. What is the best estimate of the probability of a male offspring based on the observed data?

Researchers collected the following data concerning comparability of diagnoses of schizophrenia obtained from primary-care physician report as compared with proxy report (from spouses). Data were collected concerning 953 people (referred to as index subjects). The researchers found that schizophrenia was identified as present on 115 physician reports and 124 proxy reports. Both physician and proxy informants identified 34 people as positive, and they are included among the 115 and 124 individuals described. Suppose there is no difference in the percentage of subjects identified as schizophrenic by physician and by proxy informants. Does this mean the two sources of information are the same for each individual? Why or why not?

A study group of 576 working women \(30-49\) years of age who took phenacetin- containing analgesics and a control group of 533 comparably aged women without such intake were identified in 1968 and followed for mortality and morbidity outcomes. One hypothesis to be tested was that phenacetin intake may influence renal (kidney) function and hence have an effect on specific indices of renal morbidity and mortality. The mortality status of these women was determined from 1968 to \(1987 .\) The researchers found that 16 of the women in the study group and 1 of the women in the control group died, where at least one cause of death was considered renal [13]. What statistical test should be used to compare the total mortality experience of the study group with that of the control group?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.