/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 107 Researchers collected the follow... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Researchers collected the following data concerning comparability of diagnoses of schizophrenia obtained from primary-care physician report as compared with proxy report (from spouses). Data were collected concerning 953 people (referred to as index subjects). The researchers found that schizophrenia was identified as present on 115 physician reports and 124 proxy reports. Both physician and proxy informants identified 34 people as positive, and they are included among the 115 and 124 individuals described. If the physician report is considered the gold standard, what is the sensitivity and specificity of proxy reports of schizophrenia? Suppose neither the physician report nor the proxy report is considered the gold standard.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Sensitivity: 0.295, Specificity: 0.892.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Problem and Terms

We need to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the proxy report using the physician report as the gold standard. Sensitivity is the probability of correctly identifying a positive case. Specificity is the probability of correctly identifying a negative case.
02

Set Up the Contingency Table

To set up the 2x2 table: - True Positive (TP): 34 cases where both reports identified schizophrenia. - False Negative (FN): Cases where the proxy reported negative while the physician reported positive. This is 115 - 34 = 81. - False Positive (FP): Cases where the proxy reported positive while the physician reported negative. This is 124 - 34 = 90. - True Negative (TN): Cases where both reported negative. This is 953 - (TP + FN + FP). Hence, TN = 953 - (34 + 81 + 90) = 748.
03

Calculate Sensitivity

Sensitivity is calculated as the number of true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false negatives. Thus, \[\text{Sensitivity} = \frac{TP}{TP + FN} = \frac{34}{34 + 81} = \frac{34}{115} \approx 0.295.\]
04

Calculate Specificity

Specificity is calculated as the number of true negatives divided by the sum of true negatives and false positives. Thus,\[\text{Specificity} = \frac{TN}{TN + FP} = \frac{748}{748 + 90} = \frac{748}{838} \approx 0.892.\]
05

Provide the Final Answer

Using the physician report as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the proxy report is approximately 0.295 and the specificity is approximately 0.892.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Schizophrenia Diagnosis
Diagnosing schizophrenia can be complex and challenging. Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder that affects how individuals think, feel, and behave. It can lead to a disconnection from reality, known as psychosis. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and support. Thus, determining who has schizophrenia requires careful evaluation by a healthcare professional.

To address the difficulty in diagnosing this condition, doctors look for a range of symptoms. These include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, and impaired functionality. However, other medical conditions and mental health disorders may mimic these signs, adding complexity to the diagnosis process.

Doctors often rely on interviews, questionnaires, and observational assessments. They may also use reports from family members or caregivers for additional insights into the patient’s behavior. These reports, known as proxy reports, can sometimes provide valuable perspectives that the patient may not reveal or understand themselves.

This highlights the importance of multiple evaluations and sources of information, like the physician and proxy reports in our example. Both had a role in identifying schizophrenia among the study's participants.
Contingency Table
When evaluating diagnostic tests, researchers often use contingency tables. These tables help to organize and interpret the data efficiently. In the case of our exercise, a 2x2 contingency table is used to compare proxy reports with physician reports considered as the gold standard.

Each entry of the table represents a different type of outcome:
  • True Positives (TP): Cases where both proxy and doctor correctly identified schizophrenia.
  • False Negatives (FN): Cases missed by proxies but caught by doctors.
  • False Positives (FP): Cases only caught by proxies but not confirmed by doctors.
  • True Negatives (TN): Cases both agreed did not have schizophrenia.
Using these categorizations, one can easily calculate sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity tells us how well the proxy report identifies actual cases, while specificity tells us how well it identifies non-cases correctly. By knowing these figures, practitioners can gauge the reliability of proxy reports in diagnosing schizophrenia.
Proxy Report Analysis
Proxy report analysis is a method used to gather additional information in clinical studies. These reports are usually provided by someone close to the patient, like a spouse or relative. They can offer insights that the patient may not be able to communicate.

In the context of schizophrenia diagnosis, proxy reports can serve as a valuable supplement to professional evaluations. They provide complementary perspectives to physician assessments, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the patient’s mental health. For example, proxies might observe behaviors or symptoms that the patient doesn’t recognize or that happen outside clinical settings.

When evaluating diagnostics like this, it’s important to understand the proxy report’s strengths and limitations. The proxy report might not be perfect in identifying all cases or may sometimes incorrectly flag a non-case (as in our original exercise). Therefore, integrating both physician and proxy reports can enhance the accuracy of dementia diagnosis, balancing potential discrepancies and capitalizing on broader information sources.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study group of 576 working women \(30-49\) years of age who took phenacetin- containing analgesics and a control group of 533 comparably aged women without such intake were identified in 1968 and followed for mortality and morbidity outcomes. One hypothesis to be tested was that phenacetin intake may influence renal (kidney) function and hence have an effect on specific indices of renal morbidity and mortality. The mortality status of these women was determined from 1968 to \(1987 .\) The researchers found that 16 of the women in the study group and 1 of the women in the control group died, where at least one cause of death was considered renal [13]. Test for differences in renal mortality between the two groups in either direction, and report a two-tailed \(p\) -value. The cohort was also followed for total mortality. The researchers found that 74 women in the study group died, compared with 27 in the control group.

Nighttime bladder control is an important developmental milestone, with failure dependent on age. Continence is usually achieved between 4 and 6 years of age, but an important minority of children experience delays in success. A longitudinal study was conducted in Britain in which nighttime bedwetting was assessed at ages \(4,6,8,9,11,\) and 15 years among 3272 children in the Medical Research Council's 1946 National Survey of Health [21]. The following data were presented. There were 1362 boys and 1313 girls who reported no bedwetting at any of the six ages just listed. Consider this as the control group. There were 6 boys and 2 girls who reported no bedwetting at ages \(4,6,\) and 8 but reported some bedwetting at both ages 9 and \(11 .\) Consider this as the case group. Ignore children with any other pattern of bedwetting over the six ages. What test can be used to assess whether the percentage of cases among boys is significantly different from the percentage of cases among girls?

A secondary prevention trial of lipid lowering is planned in patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI). Patients are to be randomized to either a treatment group receiving diet therapy and cholesterol-lowering drugs or a control group receiving diet therapy and placebo pills. The study endpoint is to be a combined endpoint consisting of either definite fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) or nonfatal MI (i.e., a new nonfatal Ml distinct from previous events). Suppose it is projected that the incidence of combined events among controls is \(7 \%\) per year. What proportion of controls will have events over 5 years? Hint: Assume no deaths due to non-CHD causes. Suppose the treatment benefit is projected to be a reduction in the 5 -year event rate by \(30 \%\)

One important aspect of medical diagnosis is its reproducibility. Suppose that two different doctors examine 100 patients for dyspnea in a respiratory- disease clinic and that doctor A diagnosed 15 patients as having dyspnea, doctor B diagnosed 10 patients as having dyspnea, and both doctor \(A\) and doctor \(B\) diagnosed 7 patients as having dyspnea. Compute the Kappa statistic and its standard error regarding reproducibility of the diagnosis of dyspnea in this clinic.

What test procedure can be used to compare the percentage of hens whose pancreatic secretions increased (post-pre) among the five treatment regimens?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.