/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 A secondary prevention trial of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A secondary prevention trial of lipid lowering is planned in patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI). Patients are to be randomized to either a treatment group receiving diet therapy and cholesterol-lowering drugs or a control group receiving diet therapy and placebo pills. The study endpoint is to be a combined endpoint consisting of either definite fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) or nonfatal MI (i.e., a new nonfatal Ml distinct from previous events). Suppose it is projected that the incidence of combined events among controls is \(7 \%\) per year. What proportion of controls will have events over 5 years? Hint: Assume no deaths due to non-CHD causes. Suppose the treatment benefit is projected to be a reduction in the 5 -year event rate by \(30 \%\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Approximately 30.2% of controls will have events over 5 years.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Annual Event Rate

The annual event rate among controls is provided as 7% per year. This means every year, 7% of the control group is expected to experience the event of interest.
02

Calculate 5-Year Event Rate Without Treatment

Using the annual event rate, we need to project the event rate over 5 years. Assuming the events are independent each year, the proportion not having an event each year is 93% (100% - 7% = 93% remaining without event). Over 5 years, the proportion of controls not having an event is 0.93 raised to the power of 5: \(0.93^5\).
03

Compute Proportion with Events in 5 Years

To find the proportion that will have the event, we subtract the proportion without events from 1. Calculate: \(1 - 0.93^5\) which gives the cumulative event rate over 5 years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Secondary Prevention Trial
A secondary prevention trial is a type of clinical trial aimed at preventing the recurrence or worsening of a disease in patients who have already experienced an initial health event or have been diagnosed with the condition. In the context of this exercise, the goal is to assess strategies that lower lipid levels to prevent future heart-related incidents in patients who have previously suffered from myocardial infarction (MI). These trials focus on reducing the risk of further episodes rather than preventing the disease from occurring in the first place.

Secondary prevention trials are crucial because they help determine effective interventions for patients at high risk of disease progression. Their findings are pivotal in guiding clinical practices and developing public health policies that improve patient outcomes and quality of life by minimizing disease recurrence or complications. Researchers conducting these trials meticulously select endpoints, such as combined incidents of coronary heart disease (CHD) infarctions, to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment being tested.
Lipid Lowering
Lipid lowering refers to interventions aimed at reducing the levels of lipids, such as cholesterol and triglycerides, in the blood. High lipid levels can lead to the build-up of plaques in the arteries, increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases such as heart attacks and strokes.

In the given exercise, lipid lowering involves using cholesterol-lowering drugs in conjunction with diet therapy to try preventing future myocardial infarctions. Here, the treatment group receives both the diet and medication to lower lipid levels, while the control group receives the diet and placebo pills. This strategy is important for treating patients with a history of myocardial infarction because it targets an underlying risk factor for further cardiac events.

Benefits of lipid lowering include:
  • Reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases by decreasing plaque formation.
  • Lowered blood lipid levels stabilize plaques that have already formed, reducing the chances of them causing blockages or becoming dislodged.
  • Potential overall improvement in heart health and increased lifespan.
Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a study design used to test the effectiveness of interventions. In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to two or more groups: a treatment group receiving the intervention and a control group receiving a placebo or standard care. This randomization helps eliminate bias, ensuring that differences in outcomes can be attributed to the intervention rather than pre-existing differences between groups.

The exercise describes an RCT where participants with a previous MI are either assigned to receive diet therapy plus cholesterol-lowering drugs or diet therapy plus placebo pills. By comparing outcomes between these groups, researchers aim to determine the additional benefits provided by the lipid-lowering medication beyond dietary changes.

Key advantages of RCTs:
  • They offer high-quality evidence due to their rigorous design and control over variable bias.
  • Randomization ensures group comparability, strengthening causal inferences.
  • They help policymakers and practitioners make informed decisions based on reliable data.
Event Rate Calculation
Event rate calculation is a crucial aspect of clinical trials as it helps researchers predict the proportion of the sample that may experience an event of interest over a given period. In this exercise, the event rate is the primary measure used to estimate how many patients may have new myocardial infarctions or coronary heart disease events over five years.

To calculate the event rate, researchers start with the annual event rate, which is given as 7% (0.07) per year. To determine the five-year event rate for the control group without treatment, we compute the proportion of patients who do not experience an event each year, i.e., 93% or 0.93. The likelihood of remaining event-free over five years is given by raising 0.93 to the fifth power ( 0.93^5 ).

The calculation steps involve:
  • Step 1: Find the annual event rate (7% per year).
  • Step 2: Compute the five-year survival rate for no events (0.93^5).
  • Step 3: Subtract from 1 to get the probability of experiencing an event over five years (1 - 0.93^5).
Considering these steps allows researchers to estimate potential benefits of treatment and informs the design and analysis of clinical trials.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One assumption in the entire experiment is that the feeding preferences of the same species of bird remain the same over time. To test this assumption, the data for goldfinches were separated by the 6 different days on which they were observed (they were not observed at all for the other 6 days). For 2 of the 6 days small numbers of goldfinches were observed (2 on one day and 1 on another day). Thus, data from these two days were also not included. The results for the remaining 4 days are shown in Table 10.3310.76 What test can be used to assess whether the feeding preference of goldfinches are the same on different days? What test can be used to assess whether the feeding preference of goldfinches are the same on different days?

Improving control of blood-glucose levels is an important motivation for the use of insulin pumps by diabetic patients. However, certain side effects have been reported with pump therapy. Table 10.26 provides data on the occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in patients before and after start of pump therapy [12] What is the appropriate procedure to test whether the rate of DKA is different before and after start of pump therapy?

A study was performed among 40 boys in a school in Edinburgh to look at the presence of spermatozoa in urine samples according to age \([15] .\) The boys entered the study at \(8-11\) years of age and left the study at \(12-18\) years of age. A 24-hour urine sample was supplied every 3 months by each boy. Table 10.28 gives the presence or absence of sperm cells in the urine samples for each boy together with the ages at entrance and exit of the study and the age at the first sperm-positive urine sample. For all parts of this question, exclude boys who exited this study without 1 sperm-positive urine sample (i.e., boys 8,9,14,25,28,29,30) If we assume that all boys have no sperm cells at age \(11(11.0 \text { years) and all have sperm cells at age } 18\) then estimate the probability of first developing sperm cells at ages 12 (i.e., between 12.0 and 12.9 years), 13,14,15 \(16,\) and 17

Researchers collected the following data concerning comparability of diagnoses of schizophrenia obtained from primary-care physician report as compared with proxy report (from spouses). Data were collected concerning 953 people (referred to as index subjects). The researchers found that schizophrenia was identified as present on 115 physician reports and 124 proxy reports. Both physician and proxy informants identified 34 people as positive, and they are included among the 115 and 124 individuals described. Suppose there is no difference in the percentage of subjects identified as schizophrenic by physician and by proxy informants. Does this mean the two sources of information are the same for each individual? Why or why not?

Acute OTM early in infancy may be an important predictor of subsequent morbidity, including psychological and educational difficulties. A study was performed among high-risk infants who had already experienced either a single episode of acute OTM prior to the age of 6 months or two or more episodes before 12 months of life [23] Children were randomized to one of three treatment groups, (a) amoxicillin (AMX), (b) sulfisoxazole (SUL), or (c) placebo (PLA), and their parents were told to administer the drug daily for a 6 -month period (even in the absence of symptoms). If children had an acute OTM episode during the study period, they received the best antibiotic care, regardless of their study-drug group. The results were as shown in Table 10.36 What test can be used to compare the percentage of children who were acute OTM-free between the AMX group and the PLA group?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.