Chapter 3: Problem 58
What would a matrix \(A\) look like if \(A_{i j}=0\) whenever \(i \neq j\) ?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 3: Problem 58
What would a matrix \(A\) look like if \(A_{i j}=0\) whenever \(i \neq j\) ?
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
I Population Movement In 2006, the population of the United States, broken down by regions, was \(55.1\) million in the Northeast, \(66.2\) million in the Midwest, \(110.0\) million in the South, and \(70.0\) million in the West. \({ }^{19}\) The matrix \(P\) below shows the population movement during the period 2006 \(2007 .\) (Thus, \(98.92 \%\) of the population in the Northeast stayed there, while \(0.17 \%\) of the population in the Northeast moved to the Midwest, and so on.) \(\begin{array}{ccll}\text { To } & \text { To } & \text { To } & \text { To } \\\ \text { NE } & \text { MW } & \text { S } & \text { W }\end{array}\) \(P=\begin{aligned}&\text { From NE } \\\&\text { From MW } \\\&\text { From S } \\\&\text { From W }\end{aligned}\left[\begin{array}{llll}0.9892 & 0.0017 & 0.0073 & 0.0018 \\ 0.0010 & 0.9920 & 0.0048 & 0.0022 \\ 0.0018 & 0.0024 & 0.9934 & 0.0024 \\ 0.0008 & 0.0033 & 0.0045 & 0.9914\end{array}\right]\) Set up the 2006 population figures as a row vector. Assuming that these percentages also describe the population movements from 2005 to 2006 , show how matrix inversion and multiplication allow you to compute the population in each region in 2005 . (Round all answers to the nearest \(0.1\) million.)
Can an external demand be met by an economy whose technology matrix \(A\) is the identity matrix? Explain.
Evaluate the given expression. Take$$\begin{aligned}&A=\left[\begin{array}{rr}0 & -1 \\\1 & 0 \\\\-1 & 2 \end{array}\right], B=\left[\begin{array}{rr}0.25 & -1 \\\0 & 0.5 \\\\-1 & 3\end{array}\right], \text { and } \\\&C=\left[\begin{array}{rr}1 & -1 \\\1 & 1 \\\\-1 & -1\end{array}\right].\end{aligned}$$ $$ A-C $$
Why is matrix addition associative?
T o u r i s m ~ i n ~ t h e ~ ' 9 0 s ~ T h e ~ f o l l o w i n g ~ t a b l e ~ g i v e s ~ t h e ~ n u m b e r ~ }\\\ &\text { of people (in thousands) who visited Australia and South }\\\ &\text { Africa in } 1998 .^{13} \end{aligned} You estimate that \(5 \%\) of all visitors to Australia and \(4 \%\) of all visitors to South Africa decide to settle there permanently. Take \(A\) to be the \(3 \times 2\) matrix whose entries are the 1998 tourism figures in the above table and take $$ B=\left[\begin{array}{l} 0.05 \\ 0.04 \end{array}\right] \text { and } C=\left[\begin{array}{ll} 0.05 & 0 \\ 0 & 0.04 \end{array}\right] $$ Compute the products \(A B\) and \(A C\). What do the entries in these matrices represent?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.