/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 Refer to a clinical study conduc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to a clinical study conducted at the Houston Veterans Administration Medical Center on the effectiveness of knee surgery to cure degenerative arthritis (osteoarthritis) of the knee. Of the 324 individuals who met the inclusion criteria for the study, 144 declined to participate. The researchers randomly divided the remaining 180 subjects into three groups: One group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called debridement; a second group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called lavage; and a third group received skin incisions to make it look like they had had arthroscopic knee surgery, but no actual surgery was performed. The patients in the study did not know which group they were in and in particular did not know if they were receiving the real surgery or simulated surgery. All the patients who participated in the study were evaluated for two years after the procedure. In the two-year follow-up, all three groups said that they had slightly less pain and better knee movement, but the "fake" surgery group often reported the best results. As a result of this study, the Department of Veterans Affairs issued an advisory to its doctors recommending that they stop using arthroscopic knee surgery for patients suffering from osteoarthritis. Do you agree or disagree with the advisory? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the facts presented and the results of the study, one can agree with the Department of Veterans Affairs' advisory. The 'fake' surgery group reported the best results which implies that the actual arthroscopic knee surgery might not be necessary for treating osteoarthritis. This suggests that doctors could potentially utilize less invasive and risky approaches, focusing more on physical therapy and lifestyle changes.

Step by step solution

01

Review the results of the study

Firstly, the details and results of the mentioned clinical study must be thoroughly reviewed. It is important to note that all three groups reported less pain and improved knee movement, including the group that only had a 'mock' surgery.
02

Understand the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs

After reviewing the study, it must be understood why the Department of Veterans Affairs issued the advisory. This advisory seems to be based on the fact that the 'fake' surgery group reported the best results, implying that the actual surgeries may not be necessary.
03

Formulate an opinion

With all the facts at hand, an opinion should now be formed regarding the decision made by the Department of Veterans Affairs. This opnion should be based on the study's results and the logic behind the advisory. One may conclude that, given the apparent effectiveness of the placebo effect in improving the patients' conditions, the Department's recommendation seems justified.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Placebo Effect
The placebo effect is an intriguing phenomenon observed in clinical research. It occurs when patients experience real changes in their symptoms, not because of any active treatment, but because of their belief in the treatment they think they are receiving. This effect is powerful and widespread in medical studies.

In the case of the knee surgery study, the placebo group—those who received fake surgeries—reported improvements similar to the groups that underwent actual procedures. This highlights the mental and physiological impact of the placebo.
  • Patients may experience symptom relief due to positive expectations and mental beliefs.
  • The placebo effect can sometimes lead to actual measurable improvements in health outcomes.
The success of a placebo in comparison to actual treatment poses an ethical concern because it questions the necessity and potential risks of invasive procedures when similar outcomes could be achieved through less invasive means.
Osteoarthritis Treatment
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that commonly affects the knees, leading to pain and decreased mobility. Treatment aims to improve these symptoms and enhance life quality for sufferers.

Conventional treatments include medications, physical therapy, and sometimes surgery. The study in focus tested the effectiveness of arthroscopic knee surgeries, such as lavage and debridement.
  • Arthroscopic Surgery: Minimally invasive procedures meant to relieve joint pain and improve function.
  • Lavage: Flushing knee joints with fluid to remove loose debris.
  • Debridement: The removal of loose cartilage or bone fragments from the knee.
Despite their use, the study suggested these surgeries may not be more effective than the sham procedure, raising questions about their necessity in treating osteoarthritis.
Randomized Controlled Trials
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard in clinical research. They are carefully designed experiments where participants are randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group. This randomization helps ensure that the results are not biased.

In this study, 180 subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: debridement surgery, lavage surgery, and the placebo or sham surgery group.
  • Randomization helps in eliminating selection bias, making the groups comparable.
  • Blinding ensures that neither the participants nor the researchers know who receives the actual treatment, which helps prevent bias in treatment administration and outcome assessment.
The careful design of RCTs aims to uncover the true efficacy of treatments without interference from external variables. This makes them a crucial component in evaluating medical procedures, ensuring any claimed benefit is due to the treatment itself and not external factors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to a study conducted between 2008 and 2010 on the effectiveness of saw palmetto fruit extracts at treating lower urinary tract symptoms in men with prostate enlargement. (Saw palmetto is a widely used over-the-counter supplement for treating urinary tract symptoms.) In the study, 369 men aged 45 years or older were randomly divided into a group taking a daily placebo and a group taking saw palmetto. Participants were nonpaid volunteers recruited at 11 North American sites. All had moderately impaired urinary flow. Because the saw palmetto extract has a mild odor, the doses were administered using gelcaps to eliminate the odor. In an analysis of the 306 men who completed the 72 -week trial, both groups had similar small improvements in mean symptom scores, but saw palmetto conferred no benefit over placebo on symptom scores or on any secondary outcomes. (a) Describe the sample for the study. (b) Was the sample chosen using random sampling? Explain.

Refer to a clinical trial named APPROVe designed to determine whether Vioxx, a medication used for \(a r\) thritis and acute pain, was effective in preventing the recurrence of colorectal polyps in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas. APPROVe was conducted between 2002 and 2003 and involved 2586 participants, all of whom had a history of colorectal adenomas. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: 1287 were given 25 milligrams of Vioxx daily for the duration of the clinical trial (originally intended to last three years), and 1299 patients were given a placebo. Neither the participants nor the doctors involved in the clinical trial knew who was in which group. During the trial, 72 of the participants had cardiovascular events (mostly heart attacks or strokes). Later it was found that 46 of these people were from the group taking the Vioxx and only 26 were from the group taking the placebo. Based on these results, the clinical trial was stopped in 2003 and Vioxx was taken off the market in 2004. Describe the sample for APPROVe.

Darroch's method. is a method for estimating the size of a population using multiple (more than two) captures. For example, suppose that there are four captures of sizes \(n_{1}, n_{2}, n_{3},\) and \(n_{4},\) respectively, and let \(M\) be the total number of distinct individuals caught in the four captures (i.e., an individual that is captured in more than one capture is counted only once). Darroch's method gives the estimate for \(N\) as the unique solution of the equation \(\left(1-\frac{M}{N}\right)=\left(1-\frac{n_{1}}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{n_{2}}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{n_{3}}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{n_{4}}{N}\right)\). (a) Suppose that we are estimating the size of a population of fish in a pond using four separate captures. The sizes of the captures are \(n_{1}=30, n_{2}=15, n_{3}=22,\) and \(n_{4}=45 .\) The number of distinct fish caught is \(M=75 .\) Estimate the size of the population using Darroch's formula (b) Show that with just two captures Darroch's method gives the same answer as the capture-recapture method.

A large jar contains an unknown number of red gumballs and 150 green gumballs. As part of a seventh-grade class project the teacher asks Carlos to estimate the total number of gumballs in the jar using a sample. Carlos draws a sample of 50 gumballs, of which 19 are red and 31 are green. Use Carlos' sample to estimate the number of gumballs in the jar.

Informal surveys. In everyday life we are constantly involved in activities that can be described as informal surveys, often without even realizing it. Here are some examples. (i) Al gets up in the morning and wants to know what kind of day it is going to be, so he peeks out the window. He doesn't see any dark clouds, so he figures it's not going to rain. (ii) Betty takes a sip from a cup of coffee and burns her lips. She concludes that the coffee is too hot and decides to add a tad of cold water to it. (iii) Carla got her first Math 101 exam back with a C grade on it. The students sitting on each side of her also received C grades. She concludes that the entire Math 101 class received a \(C\) on the first exam. For each of the preceding examples, (a) describe the population. (b) discuss whether the sample is random or not. (c) discuss the validity of the conclusions drawn. (There is no right or wrong answer to this question, but you should be able to make a reasonable case for your position.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.