/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 Refer to a clinical trial named ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to a clinical trial named APPROVe designed to determine whether Vioxx, a medication used for \(a r\) thritis and acute pain, was effective in preventing the recurrence of colorectal polyps in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas. APPROVe was conducted between 2002 and 2003 and involved 2586 participants, all of whom had a history of colorectal adenomas. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: 1287 were given 25 milligrams of Vioxx daily for the duration of the clinical trial (originally intended to last three years), and 1299 patients were given a placebo. Neither the participants nor the doctors involved in the clinical trial knew who was in which group. During the trial, 72 of the participants had cardiovascular events (mostly heart attacks or strokes). Later it was found that 46 of these people were from the group taking the Vioxx and only 26 were from the group taking the placebo. Based on these results, the clinical trial was stopped in 2003 and Vioxx was taken off the market in 2004. Describe the sample for APPROVe.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample for the APPROVe clinical trial consisted of 2586 participants, all of whom had a history of colorectal adenomas. They were randomly divided into two groups: 1287 were given 25 milligrams of Vioxx daily, and 1299 patients were given a placebo. There were 72 cases of cardiovascular events noted, 46 from the Vioxx group and 26 from the placebo group.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the sample in the text

The text mentions that 2586 participants were involved in the APPROVe clinical trial. All these participants had a history of colorectal adenomas.
02

Identify the composition of the sample

The participants were divided into two groups: 1287 were given 25 milligrams of Vioxx daily, and 1299 patients were given a placebo.
03

Noting additional information researchers had about the sample

72 participants had cardiovascular events during the trial, of these, 46 were from the group taking Vioxx, and 26 were from the placebo group.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Composition
In clinical trials, the composition of your sample population is crucial to ensure your study is valid and relevant. In the APPROVe trial, the sample consisted of 2586 participants who all had a history of colorectal adenomas.
This specific history was a key eligibility criterion as the trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of Vioxx in preventing colorectal polyps' recurrence. Here, the characteristics of a well-defined sample include:
  • Specific Background: All participants previously had colorectal adenomas, focusing the study on a group that would benefit most from the treatment being tested.
  • Random Assignment: The sample was randomly split into two groups ensuring unbiased distribution of participants.
Sample composition impacts the ability to generalize the study results to a broader population. By carefully selecting participants, researchers hoped the trial would provide insights relevant to patients with similar histories.
Randomized Controlled Trial
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) form the gold standard in clinical research to assess the efficacy or safety of treatments. In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to different groups to reduce the risk of bias. This is exactly what was done in the APPROVe trial.
Participants were split into two groups:
  • Treatment Group: 1287 received Vioxx, a medication under investigation.
  • Control Group: 1299 were given a placebo, serving as a comparison measure.
By using randomization, researchers helped ensure both known and unknown factors were evenly distributed across the groups. This helps in conclusively attributing any differences in outcomes, like cardiovascular events in this case, directly to the treatment rather than external variances. Thus, the randomization in the APPROVe trial was essential to establishing a clear cause-and-effect relationship between Vioxx usage and its health impacts.
Double-Blind Study
In a double-blind study, neither the participants nor the experimenters know who receives the treatment versus the placebo during the trial. In the APPROVe clinical trial, this method was meticulously applied.
Double-blinding helps eliminate bias in the results by:
  • Preventing Participant Bias: Participants may subconsciously report differently if they know which group they're in.
  • Preventing Researcher Bias: Researchers could unconsciously skew results if aware of who receives what treatment.
By maintaining blindness for both participants and researchers, the trial aimed to objectively assess the efficacy of Vioxx. Such methodology is particularly important in trials, like APPROVe, where subjective outcomes (e.g., symptomatic differences) could influence the study. Consequently, this rigorous setup helps maintain the integrity of the data collected throughout the trial.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to the following story: The city of Cleansburg has 8325 registered voters. There is an election for mayor of Cleansburg, and there are three candidates for the position: Smith, Jones, and Brown. The day before the election a telephone poll of 680 randomly chosen registered voters produced the following results: 306 people surveyed indicated that they would vote for Smith, 272 indicated that they would vote for Jones and 102 indicated that they would vote for Brown. Do you think that the sampling error in this example was due primarily to sampling bias or to chance? Explain your answer

Refer to a study conducted between 2008 and 2010 on the effectiveness of saw palmetto fruit extracts at treating lower urinary tract symptoms in men with prostate enlargement. (Saw palmetto is a widely used over-the-counter supplement for treating urinary tract symptoms.) In the study, 369 men aged 45 years or older were randomly divided into a group taking a daily placebo and a group taking saw palmetto. Participants were nonpaid volunteers recruited at 11 North American sites. All had moderately impaired urinary flow. Because the saw palmetto extract has a mild odor, the doses were administered using gelcaps to eliminate the odor. In an analysis of the 306 men who completed the 72 -week trial, both groups had similar small improvements in mean symptom scores, but saw palmetto conferred no benefit over placebo on symptom scores or on any secondary outcomes. (a) Describe the sample for the study. (b) Was the sample chosen using random sampling? Explain.

Name the sampling method that best describes each situation. Choose your answer from the following (A) simple random sampling, (B) convenience sampling, (C) quota sampling, (D) stratified sampling, (E) census. (a) George wants to know how the rest of the class did on the last quiz. He peeks at the scores of a few students sitting right next to him. Based on what he sees, he concludes that nobody did very well. (b) Eureka High School has 400 freshmen, 300 sophomores, 300 juniors, and 200 seniors. The student newspaper conducts a poll asking students if the football coach should be fired. The student newspaper selects 20 freshmen, 15 sophomores, 15 juniors, and 10 seniors for the poll. (c) For the last football game of the season, the coach chooses the three captains by putting the names of all the players in a hat and drawing three names. (Maybe that's why they are trying to fire him!) (d) For the last football game of the season, the coach chooses the three captains by putting the names of all the seniors in a hat and drawing three names.

Refer to a study conducted between 2008 and 2010 on the effectiveness of saw palmetto fruit extracts at treating lower urinary tract symptoms in men with prostate enlargement. (Saw palmetto is a widely used over-the-counter supplement for treating urinary tract symptoms.) In the study, 369 men aged 45 years or older were randomly divided into a group taking a daily placebo and a group taking saw palmetto. Participants were nonpaid volunteers recruited at 11 North American sites. All had moderately impaired urinary flow. Because the saw palmetto extract has a mild odor, the doses were administered using gelcaps to eliminate the odor. In an analysis of the 306 men who completed the 72 -week trial, both groups had similar small improvements in mean symptom scores, but saw palmetto conferred no benefit over placebo on symptom scores or on any secondary outcomes. If you were a 55 -year-old male with an enlarged prostate taking saw palmetto daily, how might you react to this study?

To count whale populations, the "capture" is done by means of a photograph, and the "tagging" is done by identifying each captured whale through their unique individual pigmentation and markings. To estimate the population of gray whales in a region of the Pacific between Northern California and Southeast Alaska, 121 gray whales were "captured" and "tagged" in \(2007 .\) In 2008,172 whales were "recaptured." Of these, 76 had been "tagged" in the 2007 survey. Based on these figures, estimate the population of gray whales in the region. [Source: Calambokidis, J., J.L. Laake and A. Klimek, "Abundance and population structure of seasonal gray whales in the Pacific Northwest, 1998 - 2008." Paper IWC/62/BRG32 submitted to the International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee, \(2010 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.