/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 One implicit assumption when usi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

One implicit assumption when using the capture-recapture method to estimate the size of a population is that when individuals are tagged in the capture stage, these individuals are not affected in any harmful way by the tags. Sometimes, though, tagged individuals become affected, with the tags often making them more likely prey to predators (imagine, for example, tagging fish with bright yellow tags that make them stand out or tagging a bird on a wing in such a way that it affects its ability to fly). If that were the case, would the capture-recapture method be likely to underestimate or overestimate the size of the population? Explain your answer

Short Answer

Expert verified
The capture-recapture method would likely overestimate the size of the population since the tags can make individuals more prone to predation, reducing the proportion of tagged individuals available for recapture.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding Capture-Recapture

The capture-recapture method is a technique for estimating the size of a wildlife population. First, a sample of the population is captured, marked or tagged, and released. Later, another sample is captured and the number of marked individuals in this second sample is counted. The proportion of marked individuals in the second sample is assumed to be the same as the proportion of marked to unmarked individuals in the whole population.
02

- Assessing the Impact of Tagging

Implicit in the method is the assumption that the tagging does not affect the survival or behavior of the tagged animals. If this assumption is violated because the tags make individuals more detectable or vulnerable to predation, it's likely that a higher proportion of the tagged individuals will be removed from the population relative to the untagged ones. This means that the second sample may have fewer tagged individuals than expected if the tagging were neutral.
03

- Estimation Bias Due to Tagging Effect

Given that the tagged individuals are more likely to be predated upon, they will be disproportionately lost from the population, leading to a lower number of recaptured tagged individuals during the second sampling phase. This leads to an underestimate of the proportion of tagged individuals in the population, and thus, the overall population size is overestimated.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wildlife Population Estimation
Estimating wildlife populations is critical for conservation efforts, environmental management, and understanding the dynamics of ecosystems. One of the most practical methods for estimating the size of a wildlife population is the capture-recapture method. This method involves capturing a number of individuals from the population, tagging them in a harmless manner, and releasing them back into the environment. After some time, a second capture is done, and scientists note how many of the recaptured animals are tagged.

The key to successful wildlife population estimation using this method is the ratio of tagged to untagged individuals in the second capture. Assuming that the tagged animals mix evenly with the rest of the population and that their tagging does not influence their survival or visibility, the ratio can be used to estimate the total population size. Mistakes in this estimation process can have significant repercussions for wildlife management and conservation strategies. Therefore, ensuring the accuracy of the tagging and recapture process is essential to obtain reliable data.

Improving Accuracy in Population Estimates

To improve the accuracy of population estimates, it's important to repeat the capture-recapture process multiple times, use non-intrusive tagging methods, and account for possible factors that could alter animal behavior or survival rates due to tagging.
Biological Sampling Techniques
Biological sampling techniques like capture-recapture are crucial in gathering data about living organisms without disturbing their natural habitats significantly. This particular technique is not limited to estimating animal populations, but can also be adapted for plants and microorganisms in various environmental contexts.

Sampling involves careful planning to ensure that the data collected is representative of the population as a whole. This includes selecting the right size and location of the sample area, the timing of the captures, and the methods used for tagging. In addition to capture-recapture, other techniques such as quadrat sampling, transect sampling, and mark and recapture are used to study population density, distribution, and diversity.

Considerations for Ethical Sampling

Ethical considerations play a vital role in biological sampling. Researchers must ensure minimal impact on individuals' lives and the environment. Minimizing stress during capture, using safe and quick tagging methods, and ensuring that the marked individuals can continue their normal activities are all practices that align with ethical sampling.
Environmental Statistics
Environmental statistics is a field of study that applies statistical methods to environmental science. It's used to understand and make decisions about the natural world, from wildlife population management to pollution monitoring. When applying statistical methods such as the capture-recapture technique, it's crucial to consider all variables that may affect the outcome, including natural and human-made factors.

In the context of the capture-recapture method, various assumptions are made, such as equal probability of capture for all individuals, no effect of tagging on individual's survival or behavior, and that the populations are 'closed' during the study period, with no migration, births, or deaths. Violating these assumptions can lead to biased estimates, leading to poor decision-making in environmental management.

Addressing Statistical Challenges in Capture-Recapture

To tackle the statistical challenges in capture-recapture studies, biostatisticians use innovative models to estimate population size while accounting for potential biases. This includes modifying the basic capture-recapture model to accommodate various survival rates, different probabilities of capture, and the effects of tagging on individual animals. These refined models contribute to more accurate environmental statistics, leading to better conservation and management practices.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A large jar contains an unknown number of red gumballs and 150 green gumballs. As part of a seventh-grade class project the teacher asks Carlos to estimate the total number of gumballs in the jar using a sample. Carlos draws a sample of 50 gumballs, of which 19 are red and 31 are green. Use Carlos' sample to estimate the number of gumballs in the jar.

One implicit assumption when using the capture-recapture method to estimate the size of a population is that the capture process is truly random, with all individuals having the same likelihood of being captured. Sometimes that is not true, and some populations have a large number of individuals that are "trap-happy" individuals (more prone to capture than others, more likely to take the bait, less cagey, slower, dumber, etc.). If that were the case, would the capture-recapture method be likely to underestimate or overestimate the size of the population? Explain your answer.

Leading-question bias. The way the questions in many surveys are phrased can itself be a source of bias. When a question is worded in such a way as to predispose the respondent to provide a particular response, the results of the survey are tainted by a special type of bias called leading-question bias. The following is an extreme hypothetical situation intended to drive the point home. In an effort to find out how the American taxpayer feels about a tax increase, the Institute for Tax Reform conducts a "scientific" one-question poll. Are you in favor of paving higher taxes to bail the federal government out of its disastrous economic policies and its mismanagement of the federal budget? Yes. No Ninety-five percent of the respondents answered no. (a) Explain why the results of this survey might be invalid. (b) Rephrase the question in a neutral way. Pay particular attention to highly charged words. (c) Make up your own (more subtle) example of leadingquestion bias. Analyze the critical words that are the cause of bias.

Name the sampling method that best describes each situation. Choose your answer from the following (A) simple random sampling, (B) convenience sampling, (C) quota sampling, (D) stratified sampling, (E) census. (a) George wants to know how the rest of the class did on the last quiz. He peeks at the scores of a few students sitting right next to him. Based on what he sees, he concludes that nobody did very well. (b) Eureka High School has 400 freshmen, 300 sophomores, 300 juniors, and 200 seniors. The student newspaper conducts a poll asking students if the football coach should be fired. The student newspaper randomly selects 20 freshmen, 15 sophomores, 15 juniors, and 10 seniors for the poll. (c) For the last football game of the season, the coach chooses the three captains by putting the names of all the players in a hat and drawing three names. (Maybe that's why they are trying to fire him!) (d) For the last football game of the season, the coach chooses the three captains by putting the names of all the seniors in a hat and drawing three names.

One of the problems with the capture-recapture method is that in some animal populations there are individuals that are trap-happy (easy to trap) and others that are more cagey and hard to trap. Too many trap-happy individuals can skew the data (see Exercise 62 ). A removal method is a method for estimating the \(N\) -value of a population that takes into account the existence of trap-happy individuals by trapping them and removing them. In the first "capture," individuals from the general population are trapped, counted, and removed from the habitat so that they can't be trapped again. In the "recapture," individuals from the remaining population (those that had not been trapped before) are trapped and counted. The number of individuals trapped in the capture can be denoted by \(p N,\) where \(p\) denotes the fraction of the population trapped and \(N\) is the size of the population. The number of individuals left after the removal is \((1-p) N\). If we assume that the number of individuals trapped in each capture represents the same fraction of the population, then the number of individuals trapped in the recapture should be \(p(1-p) N\). From the two equations \((p N=\) number of individuals trapped in the capture; \(p(1-p) N=\) number of individuals trapped in the recapture) we can solve for \(N\) and get an estimate of the population. Suppose 250 individuals are trapped in the capture stage and removed from the population, and 150 individuals are trapped in the recapture stage. Estimate the size of the population.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.