/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Interpreting \(P\) -value The Er... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Interpreting \(P\) -value The Ericsson method is one of several methods claimed to increase the likelihood of a baby girl. In a clinical trial, results could be analyzed with a formal hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis of \(p>0.5\), which corresponds to the claim that the method increases the likelihood of having a girl, so that the proportion of girls is greater than \(0.5\). If you have an interest in establishing the success of the method, which of the following \(P\) -values would you prefer: \(0.999,0.5,0.95,0.05,0.01,0.001 ?\) Why? Identifying \(H_{0}\) and \(H_{1} . \quad\) In Exercises \(5-8\), do the following: a. Express the original claim in symbolic form. b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Prefer a \( P \)-value of 0.001 because it provides the strongest evidence against \( H_0 \) (\( p \leq 0.5 \)), supporting \( H_1 \) (\( p > 0.5 \)).

Step by step solution

01

- Express the Original Claim in Symbolic Form

The original claim is that the Ericsson method increases the likelihood of having a baby girl. This means the proportion of girls, denoted as \( p \), is greater than 0.5. In symbolic form, the original claim can be expressed as: \( p > 0.5 \)
02

- Identify the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis, \( H_0 \), represents the statement that is tested for possible rejection. It often includes a statement of no effect or status quo. In this context, the null hypothesis is that the proportion of girls is equal to or less than 0.5. Hence, \( H_0: p \leq 0.5 \). The alternative hypothesis, \( H_1 \), is the statement that we are trying to find evidence for. Based on the original claim, the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of girls is greater than 0.5. Thus, \( H_1: p > 0.5 \).
03

- Understanding P-Value

The \( P \)-value is the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the results actually observed, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. A low \( P \)-value indicates that the observed data are unlikely under the null hypothesis, leading to rejection of the null hypothesis. Conversely, a high \( P \)-value suggests that the data are consistent with the null hypothesis.
04

- Choose the Preferred P-Value

To establish the success of the Ericsson method, you would prefer the smallest \( P \)-value, as it would provide the strongest evidence against the null hypothesis. The smaller the \( P \)-value, the less likely the observed data would occur if the null hypothesis were true, thus providing stronger evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. Among the given \( P \)-values (0.999, 0.5, 0.95, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001), the smallest \( P \)-value is 0.001. Hence, you would prefer a \( P \)-value of 0.001.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value
The P-value is a key statistical measure used in hypothesis testing. It indicates the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as those observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. When you have data and conduct a statistical test, you calculate the P-value to determine the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
For instance:
  • A low P-value (e.g., 0.001) suggests that the observed data are unlikely under the null hypothesis. This means you have strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • A high P-value (e.g., 0.5) indicates that the data are more in line with the null hypothesis, implying weaker evidence against it.
By comparing the P-value to a predefined significance level (commonly 0.05), researchers can decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. If the P-value is less than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.
In the context of the Ericsson method example, you would prefer the smallest P-value (0.001) because it offers the strongest evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that the method may indeed increase the likelihood of having a baby girl.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as H鈧, is a statement that indicates no effect or no difference. It serves as a starting point for statistical testing and represents a position of skepticism or neutrality.
In hypothesis testing, the objective is to test whether the data provide sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Formulating the null hypothesis involves suggesting that any observed effect in the data is due to random chance.
For example, in the case of the Ericsson method, the null hypothesis would be:
  • H鈧: p 鈮 0.5, meaning that the proportion of baby girls is equal to or less than 50%.
This suggests that the Ericsson method does not increase the likelihood of having a baby girl beyond what you'd expect by random chance.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, represented as H鈧, is what researchers aim to find evidence for. It represents a new claim or an effect that one expects to be supported by the data.
Unlike the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis indicates a significant effect or a relationship. It stands in opposition to the null hypothesis and is deemed correct if the null hypothesis is rejected.
In the Ericsson method scenario, the alternative hypothesis would be:
  • H鈧: p > 0.5, signifying that the proportion of baby girls is greater than 50%.
This suggests that the Ericsson method may effectively increase the likelihood of having a baby girl.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance determines whether the results from a hypothesis test provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. It is often measured by comparing the P-value to a pre-defined significance level, typically 伪 = 0.05.
If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, the result is considered statistically significant. This means you have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
For example:
  • If the P-value was 0.001, and the significance level was 0.05, then 0.001 < 0.05, making the result statistically significant.
  • If the P-value was 0.5 and the significance level was 0.05, then 0.5 > 0.05, meaning the result is not statistically significant.
In hypothesis testing, achieving statistical significance indicates that the results are unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone, hence providing evidence in support of the alternative hypothesis. When evaluating the Ericsson method, a statistically significant result would suggest that there is strong evidence favoring the method's effectiveness in increasing the likelihood of having a baby girl.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Tennis Instant Replay The Hawk-Eye electronic system is used in tennis for displaying an instant replay that shows whether a ball is in bounds or out of bounds so players can challenge calls made by referees. In a recent U.S. Open, singles players made 879 challenges and 231 of them were successful, with the call overturned. Use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that fewer than \(1 / 3\) of the challenges are successful. What do the results suggest about the ability of players to see calls better than referees?

Car Booster Seats The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement? $$ \begin{array}{lllllll} 774 & 649 & 1210 & 546 & 431 & 612 \end{array} $$

Interpreting Power Chantix (varenicline) tablets are used as an aid to help people stop smoking. In a clinical trial, 129 subjects were treated with Chantix twice a day for 12 weeks, and 16 subjects experienced abdominal pain (based on data from Pfizer, Inc.). If someone claims that more than \(8 \%\) of Chantix users experience abdominal pain, that claim is supported with a hypothesis test conducted with a \(0.05\) significance level. Using \(0.18\) as an alternative value of \(p\), the power of the test is \(0.96\). Interpret this value of the power of the test.

OxyContin The drug OxyContin (oxycodone) is used to treat pain, but it is dangerous because it is addictive and can be lethal. In clinical trials, 227 subjects were treated with OxyContin and 52 of them developed nausea (based on data from Purdue Pharma L.P.). Use a \(0.05\) significance level to test the claim that more than \(20 \%\) of OxyContin users develop nausea. Does the rate of nausea appear to be too high?

Mint Specs Listed below are weights (grams) from a simple random sample of "wheat" pennies (from Data Set 29 "Coin Weights" in Appendix B). U.S. Mint specifications now require a standard deviation of \(0.0230 \mathrm{~g}\) for weights of pennies. Use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that wheat pennies are manufactured so that their weights have a standard deviation equal to \(0.0230 \mathrm{~g}\). Does the Mint specification appear to be met? $$ \begin{array}{lllllllll} 2.5024 & 2.5298 & 2.4998 & 2.4823 & 2.5163 & 2.5222 & 2.4900 & 2.4907 & 2.5017 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.