/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Online Data Claim: Most adults w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Online Data Claim: Most adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could. A GFI Software survey of 565 randomly selected adults showed that \(59 \%\) of them would erase all of their personal information online if they could.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the survey, 59% of adults said they would erase their personal information online if they could.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Claim

The exercise states that the claim is that most adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could.
02

Define the Population Proportion

Let the population proportion who would erase their personal information if they could be denoted by the variable \(p\).
03

Specify the Sample Proportion

The survey provided data on 565 adults, with 59% of them indicating they would erase their personal information. So, the sample proportion \( \hat{p} = 0.59 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

population proportion
The population proportion is a crucial concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It represents the ratio of individuals in the entire population who have a particular characteristic of interest. In this scenario, the characteristic is the willingness to erase all personal information online if possible. We denote this proportion by the variable \( p \). Understanding the overall population's behavior or attitude is essential when analyzing and making general conclusions from sample data. In hypothesis testing, the population proportion helps us define our null and alternative hypotheses.
For example, if the claim is that the majority (more than 50%) of adults would erase their online data, our initial hypothesis would involve this proportion.
sample proportion
The sample proportion is an estimation of the population proportion based on the data gathered from a specific subset of the population. This sample should be randomly selected to ensure that it is representative. In the given exercise, 565 adults were surveyed, and 59% of them indicated they would erase their personal information if they could.
We denote the sample proportion by \( \hat{p} \), so in this case, \( \hat{p} = 0.59 \).
  • Random Sampling: Ensures every individual has an equal chance of being selected.
  • Representation: The sample should reflect the diversity of the entire population.
The sample proportion \( \hat{p} \) is a key component when performing hypothesis tests as it helps us infer what the population proportion \( p \) might be.
survey analysis
Survey analysis involves collecting, processing, and interpreting information from individuals in order to obtain insight on a specific topic. In our context, the GFI Software survey was conducted to understand if most adults would erase their online personal information.
The steps for a thorough survey analysis include:
  • Data Collection: Gathering responses from a random sample.
  • Data Cleaning: Ensuring the data is accurate and free of inconsistencies.
  • Proportion Calculation: Calculate the sample proportion \( \hat{p} = 0.59 \) from the data.
  • Statistical Testing: Use hypothesis testing to make inferences about the population proportion \( p \).
  • Interpretation: Understanding what these numbers mean in real-world context.
By following these steps, researchers can deduce valuable insights and make informed decisions based on the data collected. Proper survey analysis is pivotal in ensuring the reliability and validity of the conclusions drawn from the survey data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Spoken Words Couples were recruited for a study of how many words people speak in a day. A random sample of 56 males resulted in a mean of 16,576 words and a standard deviation of 7871 words. Use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that males have a standard deviation that is greater than the standard deviation of 7460 words for females (based on Data Set \(24^{\text {"'Word Counts" }}\).

Interpreting \(P\) -value The Ericsson method is one of several methods claimed to increase the likelihood of a baby girl. In a clinical trial, results could be analyzed with a formal hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis of \(p>0.5\), which corresponds to the claim that the method increases the likelihood of having a girl, so that the proportion of girls is greater than \(0.5\). If you have an interest in establishing the success of the method, which of the following \(P\) -values would you prefer: \(0.999,0.5,0.95,0.05,0.01,0.001 ?\) Why? Identifying \(H_{0}\) and \(H_{1} . \quad\) In Exercises \(5-8\), do the following: a. Express the original claim in symbolic form. b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Coffee Vending Machines The Brazil vending machine dispenses coffee, and a random sample of 27 filled cups have contents with a mean of \(7.14 \mathrm{oz}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.17 \mathrm{oz}\). Use a \(0.05\) significance level to test the claim that the machine dispenses amounts with a standard deviation greater than the standard deviation of \(0.15\) oz specified in the machine design.

Speed Dating Data Set 18 "Speed Dating" in Appendix B includes "attractive" ratings of male dates made by the female dates. The summary statistics are \(n=199, \bar{x}=6.19, s=1.99\). Use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that the population mean of such ratings is less than \(7.00\).

Heights of Supermodels Listed below are the heights (cm) for the simple random sample of female supermodels Lima, Bundchen, Ambrosio, Ebanks, Iman, Rubik, Kurkova, Kerr, Kroes, Swanepoel, Prinsloo, Hosk, Kloss, Robinson, Heatherton, and Refaeli. Use a \(0.01\) significance level to test the claim that supermodels have heights with a mean that is greater than the mean height of \(162 \mathrm{~cm}\) for women in the general population. Given that there are only 16 heights represented, can we really conclude that supermodels are taller than the typical woman? \(\begin{array}{llllllllllllllll}178 & 177 & 176 & 174 & 175 & 178 & 175 & 178 & 178 & 177 & 180 & 176 & 180 & 178 & 180 & 176\end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.