/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 82 A student was tested to see if h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A student was tested to see if he could tell the difference between two different brands of cola. He was presented with 20 samples of cola and correctly identified 12 of the samples. Since he was correct 60 percent of the time, can we conclude that he can correctly tell the difference between two brands of cola based on this sample alone?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the results of the hypothesis testing, we cannot conclude that the student can correctly tell the difference between two brands of cola based on this sample alone.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) is that the student is just guessing, so the probability of identifying a cola correctly (p) is 0.5. The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) is that the student can tell the difference, so p is not equal to 0.5.
02

Calculate the observed test statistic

Calculate the observed sample proportion, \(\hat{p}\), which is the observed number of successes (correct guesses) divided by the total number of trials. In this case, \(\hat{p}=12/20=0.6\). Then, calculate the standard error of \(\hat{p}\), which is given by the formula \(\sqrt{\frac{\(p_0\)(1-\(p_0\))}{n}}\), where \(p_0=0.5\) under the null hypothesis and \(n=20\) is the sample size. We get standard error = \(\sqrt{\(\frac{0.5·0.5}{20}}\) = 0.112. After that, compute the z-score which is \((\hat{p}-p_0)/\) standard error = \((0.6-0.5)/0.112\)= 0.89.
03

Make a decision based on the computed value

We check the z-score in the z-table which gives us the probability. For a z-score of 0.89, the probability (p-value) is about 0.1871. Since this p-value is larger than the commonly used significance level of 0.05, we lack sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Based on this sample, we cannot conclude that the student can tell the difference between the two brands of cola.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a crucial starting point. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference. For our exercise, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is that the student is making random guesses and cannot reliably distinguish between the two brands of cola. In mathematical terms, this means that the probability \(p\) of identifying a cola correctly is equal to 0.5, which is the chance level in a guessing scenario.

The null hypothesis is assumed to be true until there is sufficient evidence against it. We gather this evidence by comparing the observed data to what we would expect if the null hypothesis were true. This hypothesis is typically tested through calculations, like the z-score, to see if the student's performance significantly deviates from mere guessing.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis offers a different perspective. It suggests that a relationship or difference exists, contrary to the null hypothesis. In our scenario, the alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_1\), states that the student can indeed tell the difference between the two cola brands. Mathematically, this hypothesis claims that the probability \(p\) of identifying a cola correctly is not equal to 0.5.

The alternative hypothesis is what you want to prove. It is formulated to bring out evidence from the data that may lead us to reject the null hypothesis. The acceptance or rejection of this hypothesis depends on the p-value obtained from the z-score. Thus, it's an integral part of hypothesis testing as it challenges the status quo assumption of the null hypothesis.
P-Value
The p-value is a pivotal quantity in hypothesis testing. It indicates the probability of observing data as extreme as the sample data, assuming the null hypothesis is true. In our cola-drinking example, the calculated p-value of 0.1871 tells us the likelihood of the student identifying 12 or more samples correctly by random chance, if indeed he cannot tell the difference.

A low p-value (typically ≤ 0.05) suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, leading us to reject it. Conversely, a high p-value implies that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In this instance, a p-value of 0.1871 is much higher than 0.05, indicating that the student's guess rate could easily occur by chance, and hence, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. It's essential to understand that the p-value does not indicate the importance or magnitude of an effect.
Z-Score
The z-score is a statistical measure that describes a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values, expressed in terms of standard deviations. When performing hypothesis testing, the z-score helps determine how far away an observed sample proportion is from the hypothesized population proportion under the null hypothesis.

In the cola example, we calculate a z-score of 0.89, which represents the standardized difference between the observed proportion (0.6) and the expected proportion (0.5). This score indicates that the observed proportion is 0.89 standard deviations above the expected mean.

Once computed, we use the z-score to find the p-value from a standard normal distribution table. The z-score acts as the bridge that connects the observed data with the theoretical concept of the null hypothesis, allowing us to establish whether the deviation is statistically significant.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Historically (from about 2001 to 2014 ), \(57 \%\) of Americans believed that global warming is caused by human activities. A March 2017 Gallup poll of a random sample of 1018 Americans found that 692 believed that global warming is caused by human activities. a. What percentage of the sample believed global warming was caused by human activities? b. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical value of \(57 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.01\). c. Choose the correct interpretation: i. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities is not significantly different from \(57 \%\). ii. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical level of \(57 \%\).

Dolly the Sheep, the world's first mammal to be cloned, was introduced to the public in 1997. In a Pew Research poll taken soon after Dolly's debut, \(63 \%\) of Americans were opposed to the cloning of animals. In a Pew Research poll taken 20 years after Dolly, \(60 \%\) of those surveyed were opposed to animal cloning. Assume this was based on a random sample of 1100 Americans. Does this survey indicate that opposition to animal cloning has declined since \(1997 ?\) Use a \(0.05\) significance level.

A psychologist is interested in testing whether offering students a financial incentive improves their video-game-playing skills. She collects data and performs a hypothesis test to test whether the probability of getting to the highest level of a video game is greater with a financial incentive than without. Her null hypothesis is that the probability of getting to this level is the same with or without a financial incentive. The alternative is that this probability is greater. She gets a p-value from her hypothesis test of \(0.003 .\) Which of the following is the best interpretation of the p-value? i. The p-value is the probability that financial incentives are not effective in this context. ii. The p-value is the probability of getting exactly the result obtained, assuming that financial incentives are not effective in this context. iii. The p-value is the probability of getting a result as extreme as or more extreme than the one obtained, assuming that financial incentives are not effective in this context. iv. The p-value is the probability of getting exactly the result obtained, assuming that financial incentives are effective in this context. \(\mathrm{v}\). The p-value is the probability of getting a result as extreme as or more extreme than the one obtained, assuming that financial incentives are effective in this context.

If we do not reject the null hypothesis, is it valid to say that we accept the null hypothesis? Why or why not?

Choose one of the answers given. The null hypothesis is always a statement about a ______ (sample statistic or population parameter).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.