/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 If we do not reject the null hyp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If we do not reject the null hypothesis, is it valid to say that we accept the null hypothesis? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, if we do not reject the null hypothesis, it doesn't mean we accept the null hypothesis. It only means there is not enough statistical evidence to reject it.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a statistical method that helps in decision making using data. A null hypothesis, often denoted by \(H_0\), is a default hypothesis that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena.
02

The Result of a Hypothesis Test

At the end of a hypothesis test, a decision is made; 'Reject the null hypothesis' or 'Fail to reject the null hypothesis'. This decision is based on the computed test statistic and its corresponding p-value. If the p-value is small, typically less than 0.05, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, the decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis.
03

Interpreting the Result

Failing to reject the null hypothesis does not imply accepting the null hypothesis. It only suggests that there is not enough evidence in the sampled data to conclude that a relationship exists. It does not prove the null hypothesis true. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, symbolized as \(H_0\), is a fundamental aspect of hypothesis testing, serving as a default claim that there is no effect or no difference between groups or variables. It proposes that any observed effect is due to chance rather than a specific cause. For instance, if we want to test whether a new teaching strategy is more effective than the traditional method, the null hypothesis would state that there is no difference in effectiveness.

In hypothesis testing, we gather data and analyze it to see if it supports or contradicts the null hypothesis. We do not 'accept' the null hypothesis; rather, we look for evidence against it to reject it. If we find insufficient evidence, we fail to reject the null hypothesis – but this is not the same as proving it to be true. We can think of the null hypothesis as the skeptical perspective, requiring strong evidence to be overturned.
P-value
The p-value is a key concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It is the probability of observing test results at least as extreme as the actual results, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In simpler terms, it measures how surprising the data is, given the null hypothesis.

A small p-value indicates that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, which suggests that perhaps our assumption of 'no effect' is incorrect. This leads researchers to consider rejecting the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, which posits that there is an effect or a difference. Conversely, a high p-value suggests the data is not very surprising and is consistent with the null hypothesis. It's critical to understand that a p-value does not measure the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false, but rather the probability of the data given the null hypothesis.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a decision about the non-randomness of the results of a statistical test. If the results are deemed statistically significant, it means the data provides sufficient evidence to conclude that the effect or difference being tested likely exists in the population, beyond just the sample studied.

Typically, researchers set a significance level before conducting a test, the most common being 0.05, or a 5% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis if it is true (also known as Type I error). If the p-value falls below this threshold, the result is declared statistically significant, and we reject the null hypothesis. However, just because something is statistically significant does not mean it has practical significance or is important in the real world—it just means the evidence against the null hypothesis is strong enough to be noticeable on a statistical level.
Decision Making in Statistics
Decision making in statistics involves choosing a course of action based on data analysis and weighing the evidence against established criteria. In hypothesis testing, this revolves around deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis or not to reject it.

When making these decisions, we don't only consider the p-value but also factors such as the effect size, which tells us how large an effect or difference is, and the context of the study. Furthermore, we must be mindful of potential errors; a false positive (Type I error) when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis, and a false negative (Type II error) when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis.

Ultimately, statistical decision making is about interpreting and acting on the results in a thoughtful and informed manner, being aware of the limitations of the analysis, such as sample size, experimental design, and external validity, and considering the practical implications of the findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A psychologist is interested in testing whether offering students a financial incentive improves their video-game-playing skills. She collects data and performs a hypothesis test to test whether the probability of getting to the highest level of a video game is greater with a financial incentive than without. Her null hypothesis is that the probability of getting to this level is the same with or without a financial incentive. The alternative is that this probability is greater. She gets a p-value from her hypothesis test of \(0.003 .\) Which of the following is the best interpretation of the p-value? i. The p-value is the probability that financial incentives are not effective in this context. ii. The p-value is the probability of getting exactly the result obtained, assuming that financial incentives are not effective in this context. iii. The p-value is the probability of getting a result as extreme as or more extreme than the one obtained, assuming that financial incentives are not effective in this context. iv. The p-value is the probability of getting exactly the result obtained, assuming that financial incentives are effective in this context. \(\mathrm{v}\). The p-value is the probability of getting a result as extreme as or more extreme than the one obtained, assuming that financial incentives are effective in this context.

The label on a can of mixed nuts says that the mixture contains \(40 \%\) peanuts. After opening a can of nuts and finding 22 peanuts in a can of 50 nuts, a consumer thinks the proportion of peanuts in the mixture differs from \(40 \%\). The consumer writes these hypotheses: \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mathrm{p} \neq 0.40\) and \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: \mathrm{p}=0.44\) where \(p\) represents the proportion of peanuts in all cans of mixed nuts from this company. Are these hypotheses written correctly? Correct any mistakes as needed.

If we reject the null hypothesis, can we claim to have proved that the null hypothesis is false? Why or why not?

Give the null and alternative hypotheses for each test, and state whether a one-proportion z-test or a two-proportion z-test would be appropriate. a. You test a person to see whether he can tell tap water from bottled water. You give him 20 sips selected randomly (half from tap water and half from bottled water) and record the proportion he gets correct to test the hypothesis. b. You test a random sample of students at your college who stand on one foot with their eyes closed and determine who can stand for at least 10 seconds, comparing athletes and nonathletes.

Historically (from about 2001 to 2014 ), \(57 \%\) of Americans believed that global warming is caused by human activities. A March 2017 Gallup poll of a random sample of 1018 Americans found that 692 believed that global warming is caused by human activities. a. What percentage of the sample believed global warming was caused by human activities? b. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical value of \(57 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.01\). c. Choose the correct interpretation: i. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities is not significantly different from \(57 \%\). ii. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical level of \(57 \%\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.