/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 The correlation between house pr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The correlation between house price (in dollars) and area of the house (in square feet) for some houses is 0.91. If you found the correlation between house price in thousands of dollars and area in square feet for the same houses, what would the correlation be?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correlation remains the same, which is 0.91, even if the units of the variables change.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Correlation Coefficient

A correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables. The values range between -1.0 and 1.0. A correlation of -1.0 shows a perfect negative correlation, while a correlation of 1.0 shows a perfect positive correlation. A correlation of 0.0 shows no linear relationship between the movement of the two variables. Importantly for this exercise, correlation coefficients are unitless and invariant under change of scale. Therefore, if we change the units of the variables, the correlation does not change.
02

Applying to our Problem

Since we are dealing with the same dataset, and the correlation coefficient is unitless and invariant under change of scale, changing the units (i.e., from dollars to thousands of dollars) doesn't affect the correlation. Thus the correlation remains the same.
03

The Solution

The correlation between house price (now in thousands of dollars) and the area of the house (in square feet) remains at 0.91.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise \(4.1\) there is a graph of the relationship between SAT score and college GPA. SAT score was the predictor and college GPA was the response variable. If you reverse the variables so that college GPA was the predictor and SAT score was the response variable, what effect would this have on the numerical value of the correlation coefficient?

Data on the 3-point percentage, field-goal percentage, and free-throw percentage for a sample of 50 professional basketball players were obtained. Regression analyses were conducted on the relationships between 3-point percentage and field-goal percentage and between 3-point percentage and freethrow percentage. The StatCrunch results are shown below. (Source: nba.com) Simple linear regression results: Dependent Variable: 3 Point \% Independent Variable: Field Goal \% 3 Point \(\%=40.090108-0.091032596\) Field Goal \% Sample size: 50 \(\mathrm{R}\) (correlation coefficient) \(=-0.048875984\) \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=0.0023888618\) Estimate of error standard deviation: \(7.7329785\) Simple linear regression results: Dependent Variable: 3 Point \% Independent Variable: Free Throw \% 3 Point \(\%=-8.2347225+0.54224127\) Free Throw \(\%\) Sample size: 50 \(\mathrm{R}\) (correlation coefficient) \(=0.57040364\) \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=0.32536031\) Estimate of error standard deviation: \(6.3591944\) Based on this sample, is there a stronger association between 3 -point percentage and field-goal percentage or 3 -point percentage and freethrow percentage? Provide a reason for your choice based on the StatCrunch results provided.

Data from the National Data shown in the table are the 4 th-grade reading and math scores for a sample of states from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The scores represent the percentage of 4 thgraders in each state who scored at or above basic level in reading and math. A scatterplot of the data suggests a linear trend. (Source: nationsreportcard.gov) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { 4th-Grade } \\ \text { Reading } \\ \text { Scores } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { 4th-Grade } \\ \text { Math Scores } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { 4th-Grade } \\ \text { Reading } \\ \text { Scores } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { 4th-Grade } \\ \text { Math Scores } \end{array} \\ \hline 65 & 75 & 68 & 78 \\ \hline 61 & 78 & 61 & 79 \\ \hline 62 & 79 & 69 & 80 \\ \hline 65 & 79 & 68 & 77 \\ \hline 59 & 72 & 75 & 89 \\ \hline 72 & 82 & 71 & 84 \\ \hline 74 & 81 & 68 & 83 \\ \hline 70 & 82 & 75 & 84 \\ \hline 56 & 69 & 63 & 78 \\ \hline 75 & 85 & 71 & 85 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find and report the value for the correlation coefficient and the regression equation for predicting the math score from the reading score. Use the words Reading and Math in your regression equation and round off to two decimal places. Then find the predicted math score for a state with a reading score of 70 . b. Find and report the value of the correlation coefficient regression equation for predicting the reading score from the math score. Then find the predicted reading score for a state with a math score of 70 . c. Discuss the effect of changing the choice of dependent and independent variable on the value of \(r\) and on the regression equation.

Move studios try to predict how much money their movies will make. One possible predictor is the amount of money spent on the production of the movie. The table shows the budget and amount of money made for a sample of movies made in 2017 . The budget (amount spent making the movie) and gross (amount earned by ticket sales) are shown in the table. Make a scatterplot of the data and comment on what you see. If appropriate, do a complete linear regression analysis. If it is not appropriate to do so, explain why not. (Source: IMDB) $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { Film } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Gross(in \$ } \\ \text { millions) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Budget (in \$ } \\ \text { millions) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Wonder Woman } & 412.6 & 149 \\ \hline \text { Beauty and the Beast } & 504 & 160 \\ \hline \text { Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. } 2 & 389.8 & 200 \\ \hline \text { Spider-Man: Homecoming } & 334.2 & 175 \\ \hline \text { It } & 327.5 & 35 \\ \hline \text { Despicable Me 3 } & 264.6 & 80 \\ \hline \text { Logan } & 226.3 & 97 \\ \hline \text { The Fate of the Furious } & 225.8 & 250 \\ \hline \text { Dunkirk } & 188 & 100 \\ \hline \text { The LEGO Batman Movie } & 175.8 & 80 \\ \hline \text { Thor Ragnarok } & 310.7 & 180 \\ \hline \text { Get Out } & 175.5 & 5 \\ \hline \text { Dead Men Tell No Tales } & 172.6 & 230 \\ \hline \text { Cars } 3 & 152 & 175 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Some investors use a technique called the "Dogs of the Dow" to invest. They pick several stocks that are performing poorly from the Dow Jones group (which is a composite of 30 wellknown stocks) and invest in these. Explain why these stocks will probably do better than they have done before.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.