/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 70 Data on the 3-point percentage, ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Data on the 3-point percentage, field-goal percentage, and free-throw percentage for a sample of 50 professional basketball players were obtained. Regression analyses were conducted on the relationships between 3-point percentage and field-goal percentage and between 3-point percentage and freethrow percentage. The StatCrunch results are shown below. (Source: nba.com) Simple linear regression results: Dependent Variable: 3 Point \% Independent Variable: Field Goal \% 3 Point \(\%=40.090108-0.091032596\) Field Goal \% Sample size: 50 \(\mathrm{R}\) (correlation coefficient) \(=-0.048875984\) \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=0.0023888618\) Estimate of error standard deviation: \(7.7329785\) Simple linear regression results: Dependent Variable: 3 Point \% Independent Variable: Free Throw \% 3 Point \(\%=-8.2347225+0.54224127\) Free Throw \(\%\) Sample size: 50 \(\mathrm{R}\) (correlation coefficient) \(=0.57040364\) \(\mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=0.32536031\) Estimate of error standard deviation: \(6.3591944\) Based on this sample, is there a stronger association between 3 -point percentage and field-goal percentage or 3 -point percentage and freethrow percentage? Provide a reason for your choice based on the StatCrunch results provided.

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is a stronger association between 3-point percentage and free throw percentage because its correlation coefficient (\(R\)=0.57040364) and coefficient of determination (\(R^2\)=0.32536031) is higher than field-goal percentage (\(R\)= -0.048875984, \(R^2\)=0.0023888618), indicating a stronger linear relationship and explaining more variance of the 3-point percentage respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Correlation Coefficient \(R\)

The correlation coefficient \(R\) for: \n\n- field-goal percentage is \(-0.048875984 \),\n- free throw percentage is \(0.57040364\). \n\nThe value of correlation coefficient \(R\) ranges from -1 to 1. The positive sign of the correlation between 3-point percentage and free throw percentage suggests a positive relationship, while the negative value of the correlation between 3-point percentage and field-goal percentage suggests a negative relationship. However, closer these values are to 0, the less of an association exists. By comparing the magnitudes (ignoring the signs for now), free throw percentage shows a stronger correlation with the 3-point percentage.
02

Analyze the Coefficient of Determination \(R^2\)

The coefficient of determination \(R^2\) for: \n\n- field-goal percentage is \(0.0023888618\),\n- free throw percentage is \(0.32536031\).\n\nThe coefficient of determination \(R^2\) ranges from 0 to 1, and tells you the percentage of dependent variable's variation that the linear model explains. Here, the free throw percentage explains \(32.53%\) (obtained by multiplying \(0.32536031\) with 100) of the variance in 3-point percentage, while the field-goal percentage accounts for only about \(0.238%\) (obtained by multiplying \(0.0023888618\) with 100). Hence, free throw percentage has a stronger association with 3-point percentage based on the \(R^2\) values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, denoted as R, is a statistical measure that calculates the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It's a value between -1 and 1, where:

- 1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation,
- 0 indicates no correlation,
- -1 indicates a perfect negative linear correlation.

In the given exercise, the correlation coefficient for the relationship between 3-point percentage and free throw percentage is 0.57040364, indicating a moderate positive association. In contrast, the correlation for the relationship between 3-point percentage and field-goal percentage is -0.048875984, suggesting an extremely weak negative association. Thus, players with higher free throw percentages also tend to have higher 3-point percentages, a trend not as evident with field-goal percentages.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, usually symbolized as R2, represents the proportion of the variance for the dependent variable that's explained by the independent variable in a regression model. Values range from 0, which signals no explanatory power, to 1, which indicates perfect prediction.

In the exercise, the R2 for the free throw percentage model (0.32536031) tells us that approximately 32.54% of the variation in 3-point percentage can be predicted from the free throw percentage. Conversely, the field-goal percentage model has an R2 of 0.0023888618, implying it explains a negligible portion of the variance in 3-point percentage. This numerical evidence reinforces that free throw performance is a more reliable predictor of 3-point shooting than field-goal percentage.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis encompasses a variety of techniques used to interpret data, make predictions, and drive decisions. In this context, it involves exploratory data analysis to understand relationships between variables and includes both descriptive statistics (like means and variances) and inferential statistics (like regression analysis).

The purpose of conducting a statistical analysis on the basketball players' shooting percentages is to quantify the strength of association between different types of shooting. The approaches shown – using R and R2 – permit us to draw conclusions from the provided sample to the general population of professional basketball players. The values obtained from the exercise imply that while both free-throw percentage and field-goal percentage are related to 3-point shooting, the relationship with free-throw percentage is statistically more significant.
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is a powerful statistical method to understand and quantify the relationship between variables. In simple linear regression, the goal is to fit a linear equation to the observed data. This equation models the expected value of the dependent variable as a linear function of one independent variable.

The simple linear regression results displayed for the basketball players' data show the equations for predicting 3-point percentage from field-goal percentage and free throw percentage. The first equation suggests that there isn't much of a linear trend between 3-point and field-goal percentages, as indicated by the near-zero (and negative) R value. However, the equation for free throw percentage presents a visible upward slope, as the positive correlation coefficient indicates a more significant predictive relationship, proven useful for coaches and analysts evaluating player performance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table shows the calories in a five-ounce serving and the \(\%\) alcohol content for a sample of wines. (Source: healthalicious.com) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Calories } & \% \text { alcohol } \\ \hline 122 & 10.6 \\ \hline 119 & 10.1 \\ \hline 121 & 10.1 \\ \hline 123 & 8.8 \\ \hline 129 & 11.1 \\ \hline 236 & 15.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Make a scatterplot using \(\%\) alcohol as the independent variable and calories as the dependent variable. Include the regression line on your scatterplot. Based on your scatterplot do you think there is a strong linear relationship between these variables? b. Find the numerical value of the correlation between \(\%\) alcohol and calories. Explain what the sign of the correlation means in the context of this problem. c. Report the equation of the regression line and interpret the slope of the regression line in the context of this problem. Use the words calories and \(\%\) alcohol in your equation. Round to two decimal places. d. Find and interpret the value of the coefficient of determination. e. Add a new point to your data: a wine that is \(20 \%\) alcohol that contains 0 calories. Find \(r\) and the regression equation after including this new data point. What was the effect of this one data point on the value of \(r\) and the slope of the regression equation?

USA Today College published an article with the headline "Positive Correlation Found between Gym Usage and GPA." Explain what a positive correlation means in the context of this headline.

The following table shows the average SAT Math and Critical Reading scores for students in a sample of states. A scatterplot for these two variables suggests a linear trend. (Source: qsleap.com) $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { SAT Math } \\ \text { Score } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { SAT Critical } \\ \text { Reading Score } \end{array} \\ \hline 463 & 450 \\ \hline 494 & 494 \\ \hline 488 & 487 \\ \hline 592 & 597 \\ \hline 581 & 574 \\ \hline 470 & 486 \\ \hline 579 & 575 \\ \hline 523 & 524 \\ \hline 518 & 516 \\ \hline 414 & 388 \\ \hline 502 & 510 \\ \hline 509 & 497 \\ \hline 591 & 605 \\ \hline 589 & 586 \\ \hline \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { SAT Math } \\ \text { Score } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { SAT Critical } \\ \text { Reading Score } \end{array} \\ \hline 580 & 563 \\ \hline 596 & 599 \\ \hline 561 & 556 \\ \hline 589 & 590 \\ \hline 494 & 494 \\ \hline 525 & 530 \\ \hline 500 & 521 \\ \hline 551 & 544 \\ \hline 489 & 502 \\ \hline 498 & 504 \\ \hline 597 & 608 \\ \hline 557 & 563 \\ \hline 576 & 569 \\ \hline 523 & 521 \\ \hline 499 & 504 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Find and report the value for the correlation coefficient and the regression equation for predicting the math score from the critical reading score, rounding off to two decimal places. Then find the predicted math score for a state with a critical reading score of 600 . b. Find and report the value of the correlation coefficient and the regression equation for predicting the critical reading score from the math score. Then find the predicted reading score for a state with a math score of 600 . c. Discuss the effect of changing the choice of dependent and independent variable on the value of \(r\) and on the regression equation.

Assume that in a political science class, the teacher gives a midterm exam and a final exam. Assume that the association between midterm and final scores is linear. The summary statistics have been simplified for clarity see Guidance on page \(209 .\) Midterm: Mean \(=75, \quad\) Standard deviation \(=10\) Final: Mean \(=75, \quad\) Standard deviation \(=10\) Also, \(r=0.7\) and \(n=20\). According to the regression equation, for a student who gets a 95 on the midterm, what is the predicted final exam grade? What phenomenon from the chapter does this demonstrate? Explain. See page 209 for guidance.

If the correlation between height and weight of a large group of people is \(0.67\), find the \(\mathrm{co}\) efficient of determination (as a percentage) and explain what it means. Assume that height is the predictor and weight is the response, and assume that the association between height and weight is linear.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.