/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 87 Move studios try to predict how ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Move studios try to predict how much money their movies will make. One possible predictor is the amount of money spent on the production of the movie. The table shows the budget and amount of money made for a sample of movies made in 2017 . The budget (amount spent making the movie) and gross (amount earned by ticket sales) are shown in the table. Make a scatterplot of the data and comment on what you see. If appropriate, do a complete linear regression analysis. If it is not appropriate to do so, explain why not. (Source: IMDB) $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { Film } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Gross(in \$ } \\ \text { millions) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Budget (in \$ } \\ \text { millions) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Wonder Woman } & 412.6 & 149 \\ \hline \text { Beauty and the Beast } & 504 & 160 \\ \hline \text { Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. } 2 & 389.8 & 200 \\ \hline \text { Spider-Man: Homecoming } & 334.2 & 175 \\ \hline \text { It } & 327.5 & 35 \\ \hline \text { Despicable Me 3 } & 264.6 & 80 \\ \hline \text { Logan } & 226.3 & 97 \\ \hline \text { The Fate of the Furious } & 225.8 & 250 \\ \hline \text { Dunkirk } & 188 & 100 \\ \hline \text { The LEGO Batman Movie } & 175.8 & 80 \\ \hline \text { Thor Ragnarok } & 310.7 & 180 \\ \hline \text { Get Out } & 175.5 & 5 \\ \hline \text { Dead Men Tell No Tales } & 172.6 & 230 \\ \hline \text { Cars } 3 & 152 & 175 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The scatterplot allows us to observe the correlation between the budget and gross of a movie. A linear regression analysis can then be done if there's an observable linear correlation to predict future gross amounts based on budget. If not, a non-linear model might be more suitable.

Step by step solution

01

Organize Data

First, rearrange and organize the data into two lists or arrays, one for the gross amount and the other for the budget.
02

Scatterplot Creation

Create a scatterplot with budgets on x-axis and gross amounts on the y-axis. Label the axes appropriately.
03

Commenting and Observations

Observe and comment on the data points in the scatterplot. Look for any patterns or correlations.
04

Linear Regression Analysis

Depending on the observations made, if there seems to be a linear correlation, conduct a linear regression analysis. If there's no linear correlation, explain why a linear regression analysis would not be applicable here.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatterplot Analysis
Scatterplot analysis is a straightforward yet powerful tool employed in statistics to observe the relationship between two variables. The scatterplot provides a visual representation of the data, helping us identify any apparent trends or patterns. By plotting each movie's budget on the x-axis and its gross earnings on the y-axis, we can easily visualize this data and make more informed interpretations.

This graphical method allows us to look for a correlation - a relationship between the budget of a movie and its earnings. Often, points on the scatterplot may suggest a type of relationship, which, if linear, could motivate further analysis. For instance, by seeing a trend where larger budgets correspond to larger gross earnings, one might speculate a positive relationship. However, outliers or clusters of points might complicate this view, suggesting other underlying factors or noise in the data.

An effective scatterplot includes well-labeled axes, a title, and a clear indication of data points, which assists in easy reading and interpretation.
Correlation and Causation
Understanding the concepts of correlation and causation is vital in interpreting scatterplots. Correlation refers to the degree to which two variables move in relation to one another. After plotting our data, we might encounter a positive, negative, or no correlation.

But it's crucial to remember, correlation does not imply causation. Just because movie budgets and gross earnings may show a correlating pattern, it does not mean that a high budget inherently causes higher earnings. Other factors could influence the success of a movie, such as marketing, box office competition, and audience reception.

The correlation might be strong, weak, or even non-existent. Identifying the strength of correlation helps in deciding whether applying methods like linear regression analysis is appropriate. If the data points reveal no discernible pattern in the scatterplot, this indicates little to no correlation.
Data Visualization
Data visualization transforms complex data sets into an understandable format, often through graphs, charts, or plots. In the case of analyzing movie budgets versus earnings, a scatterplot serves as a superior tool for visualization, offering a quick snapshot of potential trends or anomalies.

Adequate data visualization aids in making data insights accessible, helping convey information effectively. Clarity in representation is key: the x-axis with budgets and the y-axis with earnings should be clearly labeled, and perhaps a separate color or symbol for each movie to distinguish the points. It enhances data interpretation skills by highlighting variations and distributions.

In summary, visual tools like scatterplots are invaluable in revealing the underlying patterns in datasets, narrating the data's story, and guiding further statistical analyses. For students and analysts alike, mastery in data visualization empowers them to uncover insights that might otherwise remain obscured in raw numerical data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table shows the heights and weights of some people. The scatterplot shows that the association is linear enough to proceed. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Height (inches) } & \text { Weight (pounds) } \\ \hline 60 & 105 \\ \hline 66 & 140 \\ \hline 72 & 185 \\ \hline 70 & 145 \\ \hline 63 & 120 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Calculate the correlation, and find and report the equation of the regression line, using height as the predictor and weight as the response. b. Change the height to centimeters by multiplying each height in inches by \(2.54\). Find the weight in kilograms by dividing the weight in pounds by \(2.205 .\) Retain at least six digits in each number so there will be no errors due to rounding. c. Report the correlation between height in centimeters and weight in kilograms, and compare it with the correlation between the height in inches and weight in pounds. d. Find the equation of the regression line for predicting weight from height, using height in centimeters and weight in kilograms. Is the equation for weight in pounds and height in inches the same as or different from the equation for weight in kilograms and height in centimeters?

The following table gives the distance from Boston to each city (in thousands of miles) and gives the time for one randomly chosen, commercial airplane to make that flight. Do a complete regression analysis that includes a scatterplot with the line, interprets the slope and intercept, and predicts how much time a nonstop flight from Boston to Seattle would take. The distance from Boston to Seattle is 3000 miles. See page 209 for guidance. $$ \begin{array}{|lcc|} \hline \text { City } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Distance } \\ \text { (1000s of miles) } \end{array} & \text { Time (hours) } \\ \hline \text { St. Louis } & 1.141 & 2.83 \\ \hline \text { Los Angeles } & 2.979 & 6.00 \\ \hline \text { Paris } & 3.346 & 7.25 \\ \hline \text { Denver } & 1.748 & 4.25 \\ \hline \text { Salt Lake City } & 2.343 & 5.00 \\ \hline \text { Houston } & 1.804 & 4.25 \\ \hline \text { New York } & 0.218 & 1.25 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Seth Wagerman, a former professor at California Lutheran University, went to the website RateMyProfessors.com and looked up the quality rating and also the "easiness" of the six full-time professors in one department. The ratings are 1 (lowest quality) to 5 (highest quality) and 1 (hardest) to 5 (easiest). The numbers given are averages for each professor. Assume the trend is linear, find the correlation, and comment on what it means. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Quality } & \text { Easiness } \\ \hline 4.8 & 3.8 \\ \hline 4.6 & 3.1 \\ \hline 4.3 & 3.4 \\ \hline 4.2 & 2.6 \\ \hline 3.9 & 1.9 \\ 3.6 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Suppose that the growth rate of children looks like a straight line if the height of a child is observed at the ages of 24 months, 28 months, 32 months, and 36 months. If you use the regression obtained from these ages and predict the height of the child at 21 years, you might find that the predicted height is 20 feet. What is wrong with the prediction and the process used?

The computer output shown below is for predicting foot length from hand length (in centimeters) for a group of women. Assume the trend is linear. Summary statistics for the data are shown in the table below. $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|c|} \hline & \text { Mean } & \text { Standard Deviation } \\ \hline \text { Hand, } x & 17.682 & 1.168 \\ \hline \text { Foot, } y & 23.318 & 1.230 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.