/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 50 The 3-year recidivism rate in th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The 3-year recidivism rate in the United States is about \(68 \%\), which means that \(68 \%\) of released U.S. prisoners return to prison within 3 years of release. There have been many attempts to reduce the recidivism rate. Suppose you want to determine whether electronic monitoring bracelets that track the location of the released prisoner reduce recidivism. Suppose that offenders released from prison are observed for 3 years to see whether they go back to prison and that the ones who wear electronic monitoring bracelets wear them for the first year only. a. Describe a study based on a sample of released offenders that would allow the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism but would not allow it to generalize this result to all released prisoners. b. Describe a study based on a sample of released offenders that does not allow the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism but does allow it to generalize to all released offenders. c. Describe a study based on a sample of released prisoners that allows the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism and also allows it to generalize to all released offenders.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Conduct a controlled study on a specific subgroup of released offenders. The findings cannot be generalized to all prisoners. b. Do an observational study on a random sample of prisoners where some wore bracelets and others did not, but it was not controlled by the study. You can generalize the findings but can't conclude the bracelets caused a reduction in recidivism. c. Conduct a randomized controlled trial on a large and representative sample of released prisoners; this allows for casual inference and generalization of the findings.

Step by step solution

01

Create A Study That Can't Be Generalized

For (a), construct a study that only focuses on a very particular or unique subset of the released offenders. For instance, released offenders who fall into a specific age group, committed a specific type of crime, or come from a specific geographical area, etc. The study would involve this group being monitored by the electronic bracelets, and observing the rate of recidivism among them. This study would only allow conclusions about this specific group, but not about all released prisoners.
02

Create A Non-causal Study that Can Be Generalized

In (b), a cross-sectional observational study could be set up involving a random sample of released offenders, some of whom happened to wear electronic monitoring bracelets (for reason other than the study) and some who didn't. Recidivism rate in the sample would be observed during the 3 year period, and the sample's rate compared to the national rate. However, since the use of electronic bracelets is not controlled or randomized by the study, it can't be concluded that any observed reduction in recidivism is caused by the bracelets, even though the sample could potentially be representative of all released prisoners.
03

Create A Causal Study That Can Be Generalized

For (c), a randomized controlled trial (RCT) would be the most suitable study. Here, a large, diverse, and representative sample of released offenders would be randomly assigned to either wear the electronic bracelets (treatment group) or not wear them (control group). Recidivism rates would be compared between these two groups over a 3 year period. This type of study would allow for both casual inference about the effectiveness of the electronic bracelets and for generalization of the results to all released prisoners, given the random assignment of the intervention and the representativeness of the sample.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Recidivism
Recidivism is a term used extensively in criminology and refers to the tendency of a convicted criminal to reoffend. Specifically, it measures the rate at which those released from prison are rearrested, reconvicted, or reincarcerated. For example, a 3-year recidivism rate of 68% indicates that 68% of released individuals return to prison within three years of their release.
Understanding recidivism is crucial because it reflects not just on the effectiveness of the penal system but also on societal rehabilitation initiatives. High rates of recidivism suggest that former prisoners may struggle with reintegration into society, often due to a lack of support systems such as employment opportunities or mental health care.
  • Programs aimed at reducing recidivism often focus on education and vocational training.
  • Behavioral therapy and post-release support are also key components.
  • Electronic monitoring devices are a more technological approach to managing released offenders.
Overall, reducing recidivism involves a multitude of strategies aimed at better supporting individuals as they transition from prison back into the community.
Randomized Controlled Trial
A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is a scientific study design often used in criminology to determine the causal relationship between an intervention and an outcome. In our context, RCTs can help evaluate whether electronic monitoring bracelets reduce recidivism.
In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which receives the treatment (in this case, wears the electronic bracelet), or the control group, which does not receive the treatment. This randomization helps eliminate selection bias, making outcomes attributable to the intervention itself rather than other variables.
  • RCTs are considered the gold standard for determining causality.
  • Adequately powered RCTs can allow for results to be generalized to a wider population.
  • This type of design is both ethical and scientifically rigorous.
If carried out correctly, RCTs can offer robust evidence that supports policy decisions and interventions in criminal justice.
Observational Study
An observational study is a type of research where investigators observe subjects and measure variables of interest without assigning random treatments to the subjects. In criminology, observational studies can help identify correlations in the data, such as patterns seen in recidivism rates among groups of prisoners.
In the provided exercise, an observational study might include a cross-sectional approach where researchers analyze a representative sample of released prisoners, some of whom naturally wear electronic monitoring bracelets while others do not. Here, any existing differences in recidivism rates can be observed, though causality cannot be definitively established.
  • Observational studies are helpful for exploring correlations and guiding further research.
  • They often involve large sample sizes and can look at real-world settings.
  • Caution must be exercised to avoid drawing causal inferences.
This type of study is beneficial for initial investigations and can be a precursor to more definitive RCTs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a 2018 study reported in The Lancet, a randomized, double-blind controlled experiment was conducted to determine the effect of the drug upadacitinib on patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug or a placebo. After 12 weeks. patients receiving the drug had significant improvement compared to those receiving the placebo. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Restate the conclusion of the study in terms of a cause-and-effect conclusion. Why can a cause-and-effect conclusion be made from this study?

Early exposure to complex dietary proteins may increase risk of Type 1 diabetes in children with genetic susceptibility to this disease. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial reported in JAMA infants identified to be genetically at risk for developing Type 1 diabetes, were randomly assigned to a conventional formula group or a hydrolyzed formula group after weaning (Writing Group for the TRIGR Study Group 2018). Conventional formula contains proteins while hydrolyzed formula contains no intact proteins. Of the 1079 infants in the conventional formula group, 82 developed the disease by age \(11.5\) years. Of the 1983 infants assigned to the hydrolyzed formula group, 91 developed the disease by that age. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Test the hypothesis that type of formula and development of Type 1 diabetes are independent using a significance level of \(0.05\). c. Based on this study, do you think dietary recommendations for infants at risk for Type 1 diabetes should be revised to recommend hydrolyzed formula over conventional formula? Explain.

An April 2017 headline from the nytimes.com said "Sugary Drinks Tied to Accelerated Brain Aging." Is this headline more likely to refer to a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain.

Handing over the care of a patient from one anesthesiologist to another occurs during some surgeries. A study was conducted to determine if this transfer of care might increase the risk of adverse outcomes (Jones et al. 2018). Read the excerpt from the study abstract published in JAMA below and answer the questions that follow. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted of adult patients undergoing major surgeries expected to last at least two hours and requiring a hospital stay of at least one night. The primary outcome measured was a composite of all-cause death, hospital readmission or major postoperative complications all within 30 postoperative days. Results: A total of 5941 patients underwent surgery with complete handover of anesthesia care. The primary outcome (death, readmission, or major postoperative complications) occurred in 2614 of these patients. A total of 307,125 patients underwent surgery without complete handover of anesthesia care. Of these, the primary outcome occurred in 89,066 patients. The complete handovers were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome ([95\% CI, 4.5\% to \(9.1 \%] ; P<0.001\) ), all-cause death ([95\% CI, 0.5\% to \(2 \%] ; P=0.002\) ), and major complications ([95\% CI, 3.6\% to 7.9\%]; \(P<0.001\) ), but not with hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery \(([95 \% \mathrm{CI},-0.3 \%\) to \(2.7 \%] ; P=0.11) .\) a. Compare the percentage of each group who experienced the primary outcome (death, readmission, or major postoperative complications). Based on the abstract, can you reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the rates of primary outcome? b. If you were a hospital administrator, would you recommend that complete handover of anesthesia care during operations be limited? Why or why not? c. A difference between the two groups was found for all of the primary care outcomes except hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery. How do the confidence interval and p-values provided support this conclusion?

Harvard Women's Health Watch reported on a 2016 study on the association between various forms of exercise and health. In this study, researchers used data from large British and Scottish health studies to see if some forms of activity had greater health benefits than others. They examined the association between six different types of exercise with the overall risk of death and death from cardiovascular disease in particular. Researchers found that racket sports were associated with the greatest reduction in risk of death from any cause, including cardiovascular disease, followed by swimming, aerobics, and cycling. Whatever activity participants chose, risk of death dropped the more often they exercised. Was this more likely to have been a controlled experiment or an observational study? How do you know? (Source: https://www health.harvard.edu/exercise-and- fitness/large-study-indicates-racketsports-offer-best-protection-against- cardiac-death)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.