/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 An April 2017 headline from the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An April 2017 headline from the nytimes.com said "Sugary Drinks Tied to Accelerated Brain Aging." Is this headline more likely to refer to a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The headline is more likely referring to an observational study.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Controlled experiments and Observational studies

A controlled experiment involves the manipulation of variables to observe effects. A treatment or condition is applied to one group and the results are compared to a control group where the treatment is not applied. An observational study, on the other hand, involves no manipulation of variables. Instead, researchers observe and measure variables as they naturally occur.
02

Analyze the News Headline

The news headline 'Sugary Drinks Tied to Accelerated Brain Aging' suggests a relationship or correlation between two things: the consumption of sugary drinks and accelerated brain aging. There is no mention of controlling or manipulating variables.
03

Draw a Conclusion

Given that the headline suggests a correlation and does not mention any form of manipulation of variables or comparison to a control group, it is more likely referring to an observational study. Researchers probably observed and recorded the drinking habits of a group of people over time and made a connection between those who consumed more sugary drinks and signs of accelerated brain aging.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Controlled Experiment
Controlled experiments are scientific tests where researchers can control and manipulate variables. They typically involve applying a specific treatment to one group, known as the experimental group. This group is then compared with another group, called the control group, which does not receive this treatment. The goal is to observe if there is any difference between these groups as a result of the treatment.

These experiments require:
  • Consistent conditions across both groups, except for the treatment variable
  • A well-defined hypothesis
  • Repeatability to ensure that results are reliable
Controlled experiments are highly valuable because they can determine causation—whether one variable directly affects another. However, they require substantial resources and ethical considerations, especially in human studies. Thus, they are not always feasible for every type of research.
Correlation
Correlation indicates a statistical relationship between two variables. If two variables are correlated, it means they tend to move together, either in the same direction (positive correlation) or in opposite directions (negative correlation).

It's important to note that correlation does not imply causation. This means that even if two variables are correlated, one does not necessarily cause the other to happen. In research, especially in observational studies, establishing correlation is a first step in exploring complex interactions in real-world scenarios.
  • Correlation can point out possible area of interest for deeper research.
  • It is usually established using statistical methods like Pearson correlation.
Thus, conclusions drawn from correlations should be considered carefully. They can suggest trends or associations but cannot prove that one variable affects another directly.
Variable Manipulation
Variable manipulation involves changing or controlling one or more variables to determine its effect on other variables in an experiment. This is a key aspect of controlled experiments and helps in establishing causal relationships between variables.

There are different types of variables in experiments:
  • Independent Variable: The variable that is varied or manipulated by the researcher.
  • Dependent Variable: The variable that is measured, and its changes are observed in response to variations in the independent variable.
  • Control Variables: These are kept constant to prevent them from influencing the outcome.
By carefully manipulating variables, researchers can isolate and test the effects of a single factor. This control allows for precise conclusions about cause-and-effect relationships. However, real-world conditions may impose constraints on the ability to manipulate variables, which can affect the scope and applicability of the experiment's results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The 3-year recidivism rate in the United States is about \(68 \%\), which means that \(68 \%\) of released U.S. prisoners return to prison within 3 years of release. There have been many attempts to reduce the recidivism rate. Suppose you want to determine whether electronic monitoring bracelets that track the location of the released prisoner reduce recidivism. Suppose that offenders released from prison are observed for 3 years to see whether they go back to prison and that the ones who wear electronic monitoring bracelets wear them for the first year only. a. Describe a study based on a sample of released offenders that would allow the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism but would not allow it to generalize this result to all released prisoners. b. Describe a study based on a sample of released offenders that does not allow the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism but does allow it to generalize to all released offenders. c. Describe a study based on a sample of released prisoners that allows the legal system to conclude that monitoring causes a reduction in recidivism and also allows it to generalize to all released offenders.

Early exposure to complex dietary proteins may increase risk of Type 1 diabetes in children with genetic susceptibility to this disease. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial reported in JAMA infants identified to be genetically at risk for developing Type 1 diabetes, were randomly assigned to a conventional formula group or a hydrolyzed formula group after weaning (Writing Group for the TRIGR Study Group 2018). Conventional formula contains proteins while hydrolyzed formula contains no intact proteins. Of the 1079 infants in the conventional formula group, 82 developed the disease by age \(11.5\) years. Of the 1983 infants assigned to the hydrolyzed formula group, 91 developed the disease by that age. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Test the hypothesis that type of formula and development of Type 1 diabetes are independent using a significance level of \(0.05\). c. Based on this study, do you think dietary recommendations for infants at risk for Type 1 diabetes should be revised to recommend hydrolyzed formula over conventional formula? Explain.

In a 2018 study reported in The Lancet, a randomized, double-blind controlled experiment was conducted to determine the effect of the drug upadacitinib on patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug or a placebo. After 12 weeks. patients receiving the drug had significant improvement compared to those receiving the placebo. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Restate the conclusion of the study in terms of a cause-and-effect conclusion. Why can a cause-and-effect conclusion be made from this study?

The following two headlines concern the same topic. Which one has language that suggests a cause-and-effect relationship, and which does not? Headline A: "Dairy Builds Muscle" Headline B: "People Who Consume More Dairy Products Tend to Have More Muscle"

Suppose a person with access to student records at your college has a list of currently enrolled students. The person sorts the data to create two new lists. One contains all the male names, the other all the female names. The person then uses a random number generator to select 50 men and 50 women. What kind of sampling does this illustrate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.