/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Suppose you want to compare the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose you want to compare the effectiveness of the flu vaccine in preventing the flu using one of two different forms: nasal spray versus injection. Suppose you have 60 subjects available of different ages, and you suspect that age might have an effect on the outcome. Assume there are 20 children aged 2 to 15,20 people aged 16 to 30, and 20 people aged 31 to 49 . a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Describe a simple randomized design (no blocking) to test the whether the injection or the nasal spray is more effective. Explain in detail how to assign people to treatment groups. c. Describe a blocked design (blocking by age) to test whether the injection or the nasal spray is more effective. Explain in detail how you will assign people to treatment groups. d. What advantage does the blocked design have?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The treatment variable is the form of flu vaccine, and the response variable is the occurrence of flu. In a simple randomized design, participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups regardless of age. In the blocked design, participants are first grouped by age, and then treatments are assigned randomly within each group. The advantage of blocked design is that it controls for variability due to age.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the variables

In this experiment, the treatment variable is the form of the flu vaccine - either nasal spray or injection. The response variable is whether or not the subject contracts the flu after vaccination.
02

Describe a simple randomized design

In a simple randomized design, subjects are randomly assigned to treatment groups. In this case, we can number the participants from 1 to 60, and then use a random number generator to assign each participant to receive either the nasal spray or the injection. We should aim for an equal number of participants for both treatment groups, i.e., 30 participants for the nasal spray and 30 for the injection.
03

Describe a blocked design

In a blocked design, the subjects are divided into blocks or groups before assigning treatments. Here, we can divide the participants into three age groups (blocks): 2-15, 16-30, and 31-49. Then, randomly assign treatments within each block. For example, within the 2-15 age group, 10 children could randomly get the spray and 10 get the injection. Repeat for the other two age groups.
04

Benefits of the blocked design

Block design helps control the variability within each block. In this case, age is a suspected factor that might affect the outcomes of the study. Therefore, blocking by age will control for differences in response due to age, making the comparison between the nasal spray and injection more clear and reliable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomized Design
In statistics, a randomized design is a fundamental method used to compare treatments under investigation. The primary goal of such a design is to reduce bias and ensure that the treatment groups only differ by the treatment being tested.

When implementing a simple randomized design, each subject is assigned to a treatment group purely by chance. This approach helps to ensure that each group is comparable in terms of unknown or uncontrollable variables. In the context of evaluating flu vaccines, subjects would be randomly divided into two groups: one for the nasal spray and another for the injection treatment.

To execute this effectively in the experiment:

  • Assign a unique identifier, such as a number, to each subject.
  • Utilize a random number generator to divide subjects into two groups.
  • Aim to have an equal number of subjects in each group to maintain balance.

This randomness is crucial as it helps to mitigate the effect of confounding variables that might otherwise skew the results.
Blocked Design
A blocked design is a type of experimental design that groups subjects into 'blocks' based on certain inherent characteristics before treatments are assigned. This method is utilized when there is a known variable, which is likely to influence the response variable, and this variable can be controlled by grouping.

In the context of the flu vaccine study, subjects are grouped into blocks based on age ranges (2-15, 16-30, and 31-49). By blocking subjects by age, researchers can:

  • Control for age-related differences that might affect vaccine effectiveness.
  • Compare the effectiveness within each age group, thereby reducing age-related variability.
  • Enhance the accuracy of comparing the two forms of vaccines by minimizing confounding effects of age.

Within each age block, subjects would then be randomly assigned to receive either the nasal spray or the injection. The randomization continues to play a key role, but within more homogeneous groups.
Treatment Variable
In any scientific study, a treatment variable, also known as an independent variable, refers to the element of the study that is manipulated or changed to observe its effect on the response variable. It's the condition given to the experimental group, while the control group receives the standard condition or a placebo.

In our flu vaccine study, the treatment variable is the form of the vaccine provided — nasal spray or injection. The study is designed to:

  • Independently vary the form of the vaccine between subjects.
  • Monitor and measure the outcome (response) based on the specific treatment administered.

Identifying the treatment variable is crucial as it sets the stage for the entire experiment and serves as the basis for any causal conclusions drawn.
Response Variable
The response variable, also known as the dependent variable, is the outcome that researchers are trying to explain or predict. It's the effect or result that is observed as a consequence of the treatment variable.

In the flu vaccine example, the response variable is whether or not the subject contracts the flu after being vaccinated. An ideal experimental design will:

  • Allow for an unbiased observation of the response variable related to the treatment.
  • Enable a clear comparison between different treatment groups.

Documenting the response to the treatment accurately is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment and for the validity of the experiment's results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Very late onset schizophrenia affects people who are at least 60 years old. In a 2018 study reported in The Lancet Psychiatry, researchers conducted a double-blind controlled experiment to study the effect of the drug amisulpride on these patients (Howard et al., 2018 ). The experiment was divided into two stages, and subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 received the drug for both stages, Group 2 received the drug for stage 1 and the placebo for stage 2, and Group 3 received the placebo for state 1 and the drug for stage \(2 .\) Researchers found that those subjects receiving the drug showed reduced psychosis symptoms compared with those receiving the placebo. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Restate the conclusion of the study in terms of a cause-and-effect conclusion. Why can a cause-and-effect conclusion be made from this study?

In a 2017 study, researchers investigated the effect of dietary improvement on adults with moderate to severe depression (Jacka et al. 2017). Subjects were randomly assigned to a treatment group consisting of seven individual nutritional consulting sessions with a clinical dietician or a control condition consisting of a social support protocol with the same visit schedule and length as the treatment group. There were 33 subjects in the treatment group and 34 subjects in the control group. Remission from depression symptoms was achieved by 10 subjects in the treatment group and 2 subjects in the control group. a. Was this an observational study or a controlled experiment? Explain. b. Find the percentage in each group that achieved remission from depression symptoms. c. Researchers performed a test to determine if there was significant difference in outcomes between the treatment and control groups. The p-value for the test is 0.028. Based on a 0.05 significance level, choose the correct conclusion: i. Researchers have shown that dietary improvement may be an effective treatment strategy for patients with moderate to severe depression. ii. Researchers have not shown that dietary improvement may be an effective treatment strategy for patients with moderate to severe depression.

Yoga Study Design Refer to exercise \(12.43 .\) How could you investigate whether participation in a Yoga and Meditation based Lifestyle Intervention (YMLI) caused the improved cellular biomarkers associated in this study? Describe the design of a study assuming you have 200 healthy individuals participating in the study.

When patients are admitted to hospitals, they are sometimes assigned to a single room with one bed and sometimes assigned to a double room, with a roommate. (Some insurance companies will pay only for the less expensive, double rooms.) A researcher was interested in the effect of the type of room on the length of stay in the hospital. Assume that we are not dealing with health issues that require single rooms. Suppose that upon admission to the hospital, the names of patients who would have been assigned a double room were put onto a list and a systematic random sample was taken; every tenth patient who would have been assigned to a double room was part of the experiment. For each participant, a coin was flipped: If it landed heads up, she or he got a double room, and if it landed tails up, a single room. Then the experimenters observed how many days the patients stayed in the hospital and compared the two groups. The experiment ran for two months. Suppose those who stayed in single rooms stayed (on average) one less day, and suppose the difference was significant. a. Can you generalize to others from this experiment? If so, to whom can you generalize, and why can you do it? b. Can you infer causality from this study? Why or why not?

Suppose that a new nicotine patch to help people quit smoking was developed and tested. Smokers voluntarily entered the study and were randomly assigned either the nicotine patch or a placebo patch. Suppose that a larger percentage of those using the nicotine patch were able to stop smoking. a. Can we generalize widely to a large group? Why or why not? b. Can we infer causality? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.