/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Speed skating is a sport in whic... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Speed skating is a sport in which it is important to have a suit that minimizes wind drag as much as possible, as the difference between winning and losing a race can be as small as a thousandth of a second. In the 2014 Winter Olympics, U.S. speed skaters used a suit called the Mach 39 , and none medaled despite high expectation before the games. For the 2018 Winter Olympics, a new suit design called the H1 was developed. Suppose the designers wanted to test if skaters would be faster in the H1 or the Mach 39 . They have 10 Olympic speed skaters and 10 recreational speed skaters on whom to test the suits. a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Describe a simple randomized design (not blocked) to test whether the H1 suit decreases race times. Explain in detail how you will assign skaters to treatment groups. c. Describe a blocked design using the types of skaters that could be used to test whether the H1 suit decreases race times. What advantage does the blocked design have? d. Describe a design that uses the skaters as their own controls to reduce variation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The treatment variable is the type of suit, and the response variable is the race time. For a simple randomized design, randomly assign each skater to wear either suit and compare times. A blocked design splits skaters into Olympic and recreational groups before assigning suits. This can control variability between these groups. By using skaters as their own controls, each skater wears both suits in a random order reducing variability among skaters.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Response and Treatment Variables

Treatment Variable: The type of suit worn by the skaters (Mach 39 or the H1).\nResponse Variable: The race times of the speed skaters.
02

Describe a Simple Randomized Design

Randomly assign 10 suits of each type (H1 and Mach 39) to the 20 skaters. Record the race times for each skater. It's important to ensure that the assignment of suits is completely random so there's no bias in the experiment.
03

Describe a Blocked Design

In a blocked design, we would first partition the skaters into two blocks: Olympic skaters and Recreational skaters. Then, within each block, we randomly assign 5 suits of each type (Mach 39 and H1). Recording the race times for each skater, a suitable statistical test is later used to evaluate the effect of suits on racing times within each block. The advantage of this design is that it can control the variability related to types of skaters.
04

Describe a Design Using Skaters as their own Controls

Each skater wears both suits (Mach 39 and H1) in random order and their race time is recorded both times. By having each skater serve as his own control, we can reduce variability associated with differences among skaters.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomized Design
In the realm of statistics, a randomized design is a fundamental approach used to measure the effect of different treatments. Here, the process involves randomly assigning subjects to various treatment groups. This randomness helps to ensure that there is no bias in the allocation. For instance, in the speed skating experiment, 20 skaters are randomly assigned to wear either the Mach 39 or the H1 suit. Each suit is randomly distributed among the participants, with 10 skaters assigned to each suit type.

This type of experimental design is powerful because it provides a fair comparison between the two groups. By removing any patterns or predictability in the assignment, the results are more likely to reflect true differences due to the treatment rather than any external factors. Moreover,
  • Randomized design helps balance unknown factors among groups.
  • Minimizes bias and confounding variables.
  • Ensures each participant has an equal chance of receiving any treatment.
Therefore, it is a preferred strategy in many scientific studies, as it lays the groundwork for making unbiased estimates and conclusions.
Blocked Design
A blocked design is an advanced technique in experimental design that partitions or "blocks" subjects into groups that have similar characteristics. This method greatly reduces the variability within each block, making the experiment more sensitive to the treatment effects. In the speed skating exercise, the skaters are divided into two blocks: Olympic and Recreational skaters.

Within each block, the skaters are then randomly assigned to either the H1 or Mach 39 suit. This ensures that each group has a balanced representation of the two suit types. The advantage of a blocked design is particularly noticeable in its ability to
  • Control for known sources of variability among subjects.
  • Enhance the precision of results by comparing similar sets of subjects.
  • Improve the power of statistical tests within each block.

In essence, blocked designs are beneficial when there are distinct groups or categories within the subjects. By addressing these differences explicitly, researchers can more accurately assess the treatment's effect.
Control in Experiments
Control in experiments is crucial for obtaining valid and reliable results. One way to achieve control is by using designs where subjects serve as their own controls. This method involves having each participant experience all treatment conditions under study. In our speed skating scenario, each skater wears both the Mach 39 and the H1 suit with the order of suits being randomized.

This "within-subject" design reduces variability caused by individual differences between skaters. Some key benefits include:
  • Minimized influence of extraneous variables since each participant serves as their own baseline.
  • Efficient comparison with fewer subjects needed.
  • Increased sensitivity to detecting treatment effects.

This control measure is quite powerful because it helps to isolate the influence of the variable being tested. It's especially effective when individual variability is a significant concern in the experiment. Using self-control designs can result in more reliable and interpretable outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a homeowner is considering replacing the grass in the front yard with drought-resistant plants such as cactus. She wants to find out whether the neighbors approve of this or not, so she inquires about this at every fifth house in the subdivision. What kind of sampling is this?

Evaluate the study based on the extracts from the study abstracts by answering the following questions: a. What is the research question that the investigators are trying the answer? b. What is their answer to the research question? c. What were the methods they used to collect data? d. Is the conclusion appropriate for the methods used to collect data? e. To what population do the conclusions apply? f. Have the results been replicated (reproduced) in other articles? Some researchers believe that dogs may be beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk in their owners by providing social support and motivation for physical activity (Mubanga et al. 2017). The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of dog ownership with incident of cardiovascular disease in the population of Sweden. Read the following excerpts from the study abstract and evaluate the study using the given questions. Methods: All Swedish residents aged 40 to 80 years on January 1, 2001 \((n=3,987,937)\) were eligible for this study. The age range was chosen to exclude younger individuals at low risk of \(\mathrm{CVD}\) and the elderly at low odds of owning a dog. All Swedish residents are covered by the public health care system, and all hospital visits are registered in the National Patient Register. We obtained death data from the Cause of Death Register and incident disease data from the National Patient Register. The main diagnosis in inpatient and outpatient care and underlying cause of death were used to define four incident disease outcomes: (1) acute myocardial infarction, (2) heart failure, (3) ischemic stroke, and (4) hemorrhagic stroke. Any occurrence of these diagnoses was additionally considered as a composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome ... Dog ownership was defined as periods registered or having a partner registered as a dog owner in either of the two dog registers (required for all dogs in Sweden.) Results: Dog ownership was inversely associated with risk of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and composite CVD. Dog ownership was inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Dog ownership was associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease in single-person households and with lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the general population. Our observational study cannot provide evidence for a causal effect of dog ownership on cardiovascular disease or mortality. Although careful attention was paid to adjusting for potential confounders in a set of sensitivity analyses, it is still possible that personal characteristics that we did not have information about affect the choice of not only acquiring a dog, but also the breed and the risk of CVD.

Suppose that a new nicotine patch to help people quit smoking was developed and tested. Smokers voluntarily entered the study and were randomly assigned either the nicotine patch or a placebo patch. Suppose that a larger percentage of those using the nicotine patch were able to stop smoking. a. Can we generalize widely to a large group? Why or why not? b. Can we infer causality? Why or why not?

In a 2018 study reported in The Lancet, a randomized, double-blind controlled experiment was conducted to determine the effect of the drug upadacitinib on patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug or a placebo. After 12 weeks. patients receiving the drug had significant improvement compared to those receiving the placebo. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Restate the conclusion of the study in terms of a cause-and-effect conclusion. Why can a cause-and-effect conclusion be made from this study?

In a 2017 study published in Scientific Reports, researchers (Mubanga et al. 2017) concluded that "dog ownership was associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease in single-person households and with lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the general population." Is this conclusion likely to be the result of an observational study or a controlled experiment? Can we conclude that owning a dog causes a decrease in cardiovascular disease from this study? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.