91Ó°ÊÓ

Smiling is a sign of a good mood, but can smiling improve a bad mood? Researchers plan to assign subjects to two groups. Subjects in both groups will rate their mood at the beginning of the study. Then subjects in the treatment group will be told to smile while they are asked to recount a pleasant memory. Subjects in the control group will also be asked to recount a pleasant memory, but they will not be told to smile. Both groups will again rate their moods, and researchers will determine whether the reported moods differ between the two groups. Because the initial, baseline mood rating might affect the outcome, after the first mood rating the subjects will be broken into two groups: one group with low ratings ("bad mood") and one with higher ratings ("good mood"). Patients in each group will then be randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group. Is this an appropriate use of blocking? If so, explain why. If not, describe a better blocking plan.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the concept of blocking

Blocking is a method used in experimental design to remove the effects of nuisance variables – variables that cause variability in response but are not of interest to the researchers. It involves splitting the experiment units into groups (blocks) in such a way that each block is internally more homogeneous than it is with the others.

02

Evaluating the researcher's blocking plan

In this exercise, the researchers plan to create blocks based on the initial mood rating of subjects, with one block consisting of subjects who initially presented a bad mood ('bad mood' block) and the other block for those presenting a good mood ('good mood' block). This approach can be considered appropriate as it removes the nuisance variable (mood) from the experiment. Since each block is more internally homogeneous (subjects in a block have the same initial mood), it allows for a more valid comparison of the effects of smiling in improving mood.

03

Suggesting alternatives

While the researchers' blocking plan has been deemed appropriate, there may be alternative blocking plans. One possibility could be to base the blocks on another nuisance variable that could affect the outcome, such as age or gender. However, this would depend on the researchers' understanding of the variables that could affect mood and their ability to control these variables in their experimental design.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

• Full Textbook Solutions

  Get detailed explanations and key concepts

• Unlimited Al creation

  Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

• Ads-free access

  To over 500 millions flashcards

• Money-back guarantee

  We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Blocking in Experimental Design

When conducting experiments, it's crucial to minimize the impact of nuisance variables, which are elements not of interest to the study but can influence its outcome. Blocking is a technique that serves this purpose by arranging experimental units into groups, or 'blocks,' with similar characteristics. For example, in the textbook problem, participants are split into blocks based on their initial mood ratings to ensure that each block has consistent mood levels.

This method creates an even playing field within each block, allowing researchers to more accurately determine the effects of the independent variable—in this case, the act of smiling. Blocking effectively controls the influence of variability caused by the initial mood, thus enhancing the precision of the experiment. Implementing blocking correctly can lead to more reliable and valid results, ultimately improving the quality and interpretability of the research findings.

Nuisance Variables

In the context of experimental research, nuisance variables are those that can cloud the relationship between the variables of interest. They can affect the outcome of an experiment, but their influence isn't what the study aims to assess. For instance, in our textbook exercise, the baseline mood of the participants is a nuisance variable that could potentially affect how they respond to the intervention of recalling a pleasant memory coupled with smiling.

By identifying such variables, researchers can apply strategies, like blocking, to mitigate their effects, ensuring that only the variables under study are influencing the results. It's a way of isolating the experiment's factors, making sure that if there are changes in the dependent variable, these can more confidently be attributed to the independent variable being tested.

Random Assignment

After creating blocks, the next step in an experimental design is often random assignment. Randomly assigning participants to either the control or treatment group within each block ensures that each group is comparable in terms of the blocked nuisance variable. This randomization helps further control for these and other unseen confounding variables, thereby enabling a fair comparison between the groups.

In the smiling study, once the participants are divided into 'bad mood' and 'good mood' blocks, they are then randomly allocated to smile or not while recalling a positive memory. This process aids in preventing biases and helps in establishing a cause-and-effect relationship by equalizing other potential differences across the treatment and control groups. Random assignment is a critical feature for maintaining the integrity of an experiment and is key to drawing valid conclusions from the data collected.

Control Group

A control group plays a pivotal role in experiments by serving as a benchmark that the treatment group is compared against. It helps researchers to understand what happens in the absence of the treatment being tested. In the context of our textbook exercise, the control group consists of participants who are simply asked to recall a pleasant memory without the instruction to smile.

The control group receives either no treatment or a standard treatment that's unlikely to have an effect on the outcome, which allows for a direct comparison against the subjects who received the actual intervention. This comparison can reveal whether the treatment has an effect beyond what would naturally occur without it, aiding in affirming the experiment's hypothesis. Establishing a control group is essential in experimental design, as it provides a clear counterfactual against which the effect of the intervention can be measured.