/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Suppose that you want to determi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that you want to determine whether the use of one aspirin per day for people age 50 and older reduces the chance of heart attack. You have 200 people available for the study: 100 men and 100 women. You suspect that aspirin might affect men and women differently. To ensure an appropriate comparison group, those who do not get aspirin should get a placebo. a. Identify the treatment and response variables. b. Describe in detail a simple randomized design (not blocked) to test whether aspirin lowers the risk of heart attack. c. Describe a blocked design to test whether aspirin lowers the risk of heart attack; the blocking variable is gender. d. Explain why researchers might prefer a blocked design.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The treatment variable is 'whether a person takes an aspirin or a placebo' and the response variable is 'whether or not a person at age 50 or more experiences a heart attack'. b. Randomized design: Half of the people are randomly assigned to receive aspirin and half to receive placebo.c. Blocked design: The people are divided into two blocks of gender (men and women), within which they are randomly assigned to receive either the aspirin or the placebo. d. A blocked design may be preferable when we suspect that the response to the treatment may differ between groups (blocks), as it allows us to control for these differences by examining the treatment effect separately within each block.

Step by step solution

01

- Identifying the variables

The treatment variable here is whether a person takes an aspirin or a placebo. The response variable is whether or not a person (who is 50 years or older) has a heart attack.
02

- Randomized Design

To construct a simple randomized design, one could randomly assign half the people (i.e., 100 people) to the aspirin group and the other half to the placebo group. This way, each participant has an equal chance of receiving the aspirin or the placebo; thus unbiased comparisons of the two groups can be made.
03

- Blocked Design

A blocked design could take into account gender as a potential influencing factor. For this design, the 200 participants would be divided into two blocks based on gender - 100 men and 100 women. Then within each block, participants would be randomly assigned to either the aspirin or placebo group. This way, the effects of aspirin can be examined within each gender separately, controlling for any gender differences.
04

- The preference of Blocked Design

Researchers might prefer a blocked design if they suspect that the response to the treatment might differ between blocks (in this case, the genders). Blocking provides a way to control for the effect of those suspected differences by examining the treatment effect separately within each block, making the comparison more precise and enhancing the experiment's sensitivity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomized Design
A randomized design is an essential concept in experimental studies where participants are randomly assigned to different groups to eliminate bias. Imagine you want to evaluate the effect of aspirin on reducing heart attacks in people aged 50 and older. In a simple randomized design, you randomly assign 200 participants to two groups: one gets aspirin and the other gets a placebo. This ensures each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to either group, which helps in minimizing bias. Random assignment helps balance out other variables (like lifestyle or health conditions) between the groups, enabling a fair comparison. Every participant has the same probability of receiving aspirin, ensuring that the results are not skewed by external factors. This is crucial for obtaining reliable results that are reflective of the true effect of the treatment. Randomized designs are straightforward and may be more efficient for initial exploratory studies where no strong suspicion of subgroup differences (e.g., gender) exists.
Blocked Design
In experiments where specific differences among participants are expected, a blocked design is advantageous. This involves dividing the sample into groups, or 'blocks,' based on characteristics like gender, age, or other factors. Each block acts like a mini-experiment. In the aspirin study example, we suspect that effects might differ between men and women. By creating two blocks—one for men and one for women—we can account for these differences and ensure gender-based variations don't skew the results. Within each block, participants are randomly assigned to receive either aspirin or a placebo. The blocked design thus allows researchers to isolate the effect of the treatment more accurately within each group. This method enhances the experiment's sensitivity to treatment effects and is often preferred when block effects are suspected. The design provides a clearer picture of how the treatment works across various subsets of participants, controlling for within-group variation.
Treatment and Response Variables
In any experimental study, identifying the treatment and response variables is fundamental. The treatment variable refers to what is being manipulated or tested in the study. In the context of the aspirin example, the treatment variable is whether a participant takes aspirin or a placebo. This is the focal point of the experiment, as researchers want to see how this specific variable influences outcomes. On the other hand, the response variable is what is measured as the result of the experiment. It reflects the possible effect of the treatment. For the aspirin study, the response variable is whether the participant experiences a heart attack. This outcome helps researchers determine if the treatment (aspirin) has any significant effect. Understanding these variables is crucial for designing effective experiments as they guide the formulation of research questions, experimental setup, analysis, and interpretation of results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a 2017 study published in Scientific Reports, researchers (Mubanga et al. 2017) concluded that "dog ownership was associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease in single-person households and with lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the general population." Is this conclusion likely to be the result of an observational study or a controlled experiment? Can we conclude that owning a dog causes a decrease in cardiovascular disease from this study? Explain.

Harvard Women's Health Watch reported on a 2016 study on the association between various forms of exercise and health. In this study, researchers used data from large British and Scottish health studies to see if some forms of activity had greater health benefits than others. They examined the association between six different types of exercise with the overall risk of death and death from cardiovascular disease in particular. Researchers found that racket sports were associated with the greatest reduction in risk of death from any cause, including cardiovascular disease, followed by swimming, aerobics, and cycling. Whatever activity participants chose, risk of death dropped the more often they exercised. Was this more likely to have been a controlled experiment or an observational study? How do you know? (Source: https://www health.harvard.edu/exercise-and- fitness/large-study-indicates-racketsports-offer-best-protection-against- cardiac-death)

The following two headlines concern the same topic. Which one has language that suggests a cause-and-effect relationship, and which does not? Headline A: "Women Who Drink Coffee Are Less Prone to Depression" Headline B: "Coffee Prevents Depression"

In a 2018 study by Hurst and Fukuda published in \(B M J\) Open, researchers in Japan surveyed 59,717 participants in Japan who had Type 2 diabetes. Participants were asked to rate their eating speed as Slow, Normal, or Fast. Researchers found that those who rated their eating speeds as Slow or Normal were less likely to be obese than those who rated their eating speed as Fast. a. Can we conclude that fast eating causes obesity from this study? Why or why not? b. Can this association be generalized to the entire population of people with Type 2 diabetes? Why or why not?

Suppose a college wishes to select the location of an electric car charging station on campus based on student preference. They have 3 possible locations and are asking a random sample of students to rank the locations with 1 being the most desirable location and 3 being the least desirable location. Explain why the campus might want to stratify the sampling into two groups: those campus members who own an electric car and those who do not.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.