/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 Effects of Tutoring on Math Grad... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Effects of Tutoring on Math Grades (Example 8) A group of educators want to determine how effective tutoring is in raising students' grades in a math class, so they arrange free tutoring for those who want it. Then they compare final exam grades for the group that took advantage of the tutoring and the group that did not. Suppose the group participating in the tutoring tended to receive higher grades on the exam. Does that show that the tutoring worked? If not, explain why not and suggest a confounding variable.

Short Answer

Expert verified
While there is an observed correlation between tutoring and higher grades, this is not enough to definitively prove that tutoring is the cause of higher grades. There could be numerous confounding variables like self-motivation and better study habits among students who seek tutoring. To confirm if tutoring worked, a study design controlling these variables should be used.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Setup

The question describes a situation where two groups of students' final exam grades are compared: those who opted for tutoring and those who didn't. It is observed that the group who took tutoring tended to score higher.
02

Analyzing the Cause-Effect Relationship

The immediate perception could be that tutoring is the cause of higher grades. But, this cannot be definitively established as the cause-effect. An increase in grades could be because of numerous factors like self-motivation, better studying habits, or spending more time studying.
03

Identify the Confounding Variable

A confounding factor could be the students' motivation level or their study habits. Students who are motivated or have better study habits are more likely to seek tutoring and also to study on their own, which could also explain their higher grades. This makes it unclear whether the better grades are due to the tutoring or due to the students' own habits and motivation. For an accurate measure of the tutoring effect, these factors need to be controlled.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confounding Variables
In any study or experiment, confounding variables are hidden factors that can cloud the understanding of the true relationship between variables. They create an association that may not actually exist, leading to misleading conclusions.
For example, in the tutoring scenario, motivation and study habits might act as confounding variables. Students who seek out tutoring might naturally be more inclined to study harder or be more motivated than those who don't. This means that the higher grades could be wrongly attributed to the tutoring when, in fact, they might be a result of these confounding factors.
To accurately measure the true effect of tutoring on grades, it's important to control for these confounding variables. This could involve randomly assigning students to tutoring or not, regardless of their initial motivation or study habits.
Cause-Effect Relationship
A cause-effect relationship exists when a change in one variable directly causes a change in another. In the context of the tutoring example, we want to determine if tutoring directly causes an improvement in math grades.
However, establishing this relationship is not always straightforward. In our example, simply observing that students with tutoring have higher grades does not prove tutoring caused the higher grades. Other factors, such as natural ability, time spent on study, or even external support, might be the real influencers.
To truly establish a cause-effect relationship, researchers need to eliminate or control other factors that might affect the outcome. This often involves experimental designs like randomized controlled trials which help isolate the effect of the independent variable (tutoring) on the dependent variable (math grades).
  • Ensure random assignment to eliminate selection bias.
  • Use control and experimental groups to compare results.
  • Control for external variables that might impact results.
Educational Assessment
Educational assessment refers to the systematic process of documenting and using empirical data to measure knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs. It's a pivotal part of understanding the effectiveness of educational interventions, like tutoring.
In our example, assessing the impact of tutoring involves looking at exam grades as a measure of student learning. But relying purely on grades can be limiting. To get a full picture, other forms of assessment might be needed.
These could include:
  • Pre- and post-tests to measure improvement specifically due to tutoring.
  • Qualitative feedback from students to understand changes in attitudes or confidence.
  • Tracking long-term outcomes beyond immediate grades, such as continued academic performance.
Through comprehensive assessment, educators can better interpret the true impact of tutoring and make informed decisions about its future application in educational settings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe the design of a controlled experiment to determine whether the use of vitamin D supplements reduces the chance of broken bones in women with osteoporosis (weak bones). Assume you have 200 women with osteoporosis to work with. Your description should include all the features of a controlled experiment. Also decide how the results would be determined.

Diet and Depression (Example 11) An article in the journal BMC Medicine reported on a study designed to study the effect of diet on depression. Subjects suffering from moderate to severe depression were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a diet intervention group and a social support control group. The 33 subjects in the diet intervention group received counseling and support to adhere to a "ModiMedDiet," based primarily on a Mediterranean diet. The 34 subjects in the social support group participated in a "befriending" protocol, where trained personnel engaged in conversation and activities with participants. At the end of a 12 -week period, 11 of the diet intervention group achieved remission from depression compared to 3 of the control group. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Diet } \\ \text { (Intervention) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Support } \\ \text { (Control) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Remission } & 11 & 3 \\ \hline \text { No Remission } & 22 & 31 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find and compare the sample percentage of remission for each group. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. Can we conclude that the diet caused a remission in depression? Why or why not?

a. A statistics class is made up of 15 men and 23 women. What percentage of the class is male? b. A different class has 234 students, and \(64.1 \%\) of them are men. How many men are in the class? c. A different class is made up of \(40 \%\) women and has 20 women in it. What is the total number of students in the class?

College students who were drivers were asked if they had ever driven a car 100 mph or more (yes or no). The results are shown in the table, along with gender. a. There are two variables in the table, state what they are and whether each is categorical or numerical. b. Make a two-way table of the results with Male and Female across the top and Yes and No at the left edge. c. Compare the percentages of men and women who have driven \(100 \mathrm{mph}\) or more. $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Gender } & \mathbf{1 0 0}+\text { mph } & \text { Gender } & \mathbf{1 0 0}+\mathbf{~ m p h} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{y} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{y} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{n} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{n} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{m} & \mathrm{n} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{f} & \mathrm{n} \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Association between Glycemic Load and Acne? An article in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics reported on a study of diet in subjects with moderate to severe acne. Read the excerpts from the abstract and answer the questions that follow. (Source: Burris et al., "Differences in dietary glycemic load and hormones in New York City adults with no or moderate/severe acne," Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 117 [September 2017]: \(1375-1383\) ) Methods: Sixty-four participants (no acne, \(\mathrm{n}=32\); moderate/severe acne, \(\mathrm{n}=32\) ) were included in this study. Participants completed a 5 -day food record, had blood drawn and completed a questionnaire to evaluate food-aggravated acne beliefs and acne-specific quality of life. Results: Participants with moderate/severe acne consumed greater total carbohydrate compared to participants without acne. Participants with moderate/severe acne had greater insulin compared to participants without acne. Although there were no differences between groups, \(61 \%\) of participants reported food-influenced acne. a. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain how you know. b. Assuming the study was properly conducted, can we conclude that higher consumption of carbohydrates causes more severe acne? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.