/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 The 2017 World Almanac and Book ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The 2017 World Almanac and Book of Facts reported that the U.S. occupation projected to grow the most is personal care aide. By 2024 there will be a need for 160,328 personal care aides, a growth of about \(26 \%\) over 2014 levels. How many personal care aides were there in 2014 ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The number of personal care aides in the U.S. in 2014 was approximately 127,253.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the problem

The problem provides the projected number of personal care aides in U.S by 2024, and the percentage growth rate from 2014 to 2024. We are asked to find the initial number of personal care aides in 2014.
02

Apply the formula for calculating initial amount

We can use the formula \[Initial Amount = \frac{Final Amount}{1 + growth rate}\] to find the number of personal care aides in 2014. The final amount (projection for 2024) is 160328, and the growth rate is 26% or 0.26. Plugging these values into the formula we get: \[Initial Amount = \frac{160328}{1 + 0.26}\]
03

Calculate the initial amount

Calculate the number after plugging the values into the formula. This will give us the initial number of personal care aides in 2014.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. A hospital employs 346 nurses, and \(35 \%\) of them are male. How many male nurses are there? b. An engineering firm employs 178 engineers, and 112 of them are male. What percentage of these engineers are female? c. A large law firm is made up of \(65 \%\) male lawyers, or 169 male lawyers. What is the total number of lawyers at the firm?

Indicate whether the study is an observational study or a controlled experiment. A group of boys is randomly divided into two groups. One group watches violent cartoons for one hour, and the other group watches cartoons without violence for one hour. The boys are then observed to see how many violent actions they take in the next two hours, and the two groups are compared.

An article by Wakefield et al. in the British medical journal Lancet claimed that autism was caused by the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. This vaccine is typically given to children twice, at about the age of 1 and again at about 4 years of age. In the article 12 children with autism who had all received the vaccines shortly before developing autism were studied. The article was later retracted by Lancet because the conclusions were not justified by the design of the study. Can you conclude that the MMR vaccine causes Autism from this study? Explain why Lancet might have felt that the conclusions (MMR causes autism) were not justified by listing potential flaws in the study, as described above. (Source: A. J. Wakefield et al., "Ileal lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non- specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children." Lancet, vol. 351 (February \(1998): 637-641\) )

The projected U.S. population is given for different decades. The projected number of people 65 years of age or older is also given. Find the percentage of people 65 or over and comment on the trend over time. Numbers are in millions of people (Source: 2017 World Almanac and Book of Facts) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Year } & \text { Population } & \text { Older Population } \\ \hline 2020 & 334 & 54.8 \\ \hline 2030 & 358 & 70.0 \\ \hline 2040 & 380 & 81.2 \\ \hline 2050 & 400 & 88.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The blog \(N H S\) Choices (February 10, 2014 ) noted that "there has been increasing anecdotal evidence that vitamin C may still be useful as an anticancer medicine if used in high concentrations and given directly into the vein (intravenously)." Explain what it means that there is "increasing anecdotal evidence" that Vitamin C may be a useful anticancer medicine. How does anecdotal evidence contrast with scientific evidence? What kind of conclusions, if any, can be made from anecdotal evidence?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.