/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 a. A hospital employs 346 nurses... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

a. A hospital employs 346 nurses, and \(35 \%\) of them are male. How many male nurses are there? b. An engineering firm employs 178 engineers, and 112 of them are male. What percentage of these engineers are female? c. A large law firm is made up of \(65 \%\) male lawyers, or 169 male lawyers. What is the total number of lawyers at the firm?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. There are 121.1 male nurses, however, since a partial nurse doesn't make sense in this context, we can round it up to 121 male nurses. b. Approximately 37.08% of the engineers are female. c. There are approximately 260 lawyers at the firm.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Number of Male Nurses

To find the number of male nurses, calculate 35 percent of the total number of nurses. This can be done by multiplying 0.35 (the decimal equivalent of 35 percent) by 346 (the total number of nurses). Using this formula, the calculation would be \(0.35 * 346\)
02

Determine the Percentage of Female Engineers

First, subtract the number of male engineers (112) from the total number of engineers (178) to find the number of female engineers: \(178 - 112\). Then, find the percentage by dividing the number of female engineers by the total number of engineers and multiplying by 100. The formula for this calculation would be \(((178 - 112) / 178) * 100\)
03

Determine the Total Number of Lawyers

The problem states that 169 male lawyers make up 65 percent of the total number of lawyers. To find the total, think of the 169 male lawyers as 65 percent and calculate the total. To do this, divide the number of male lawyers (169) by the decimal equivalent of 65 percent (0.65). The formula for this calculation would be \(169 / 0.65\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The blog \(N H S\) Choices (February 10, 2014 ) noted that "there has been increasing anecdotal evidence that vitamin C may still be useful as an anticancer medicine if used in high concentrations and given directly into the vein (intravenously)." Explain what it means that there is "increasing anecdotal evidence" that Vitamin C may be a useful anticancer medicine. How does anecdotal evidence contrast with scientific evidence? What kind of conclusions, if any, can be made from anecdotal evidence?

Diet and Depression (Example 11) An article in the journal BMC Medicine reported on a study designed to study the effect of diet on depression. Subjects suffering from moderate to severe depression were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a diet intervention group and a social support control group. The 33 subjects in the diet intervention group received counseling and support to adhere to a "ModiMedDiet," based primarily on a Mediterranean diet. The 34 subjects in the social support group participated in a "befriending" protocol, where trained personnel engaged in conversation and activities with participants. At the end of a 12 -week period, 11 of the diet intervention group achieved remission from depression compared to 3 of the control group. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Diet } \\ \text { (Intervention) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Support } \\ \text { (Control) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Remission } & 11 & 3 \\ \hline \text { No Remission } & 22 & 31 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Find and compare the sample percentage of remission for each group. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. Can we conclude that the diet caused a remission in depression? Why or why not?

\(1.59\) Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Young Children Researchers wanted to assess whether a theory-based, community health worker-delivered intervention for household smokers will lead to reduced secondhand smoke exposure to children in Chinese families. Smoking parents or caregivers who had a child aged 5 years or younger at home were randomly assigned to the intervention group that received information on smoking hygiene and the effects of secondhand smoke exposure delivered by community health workers or to the comparison group who received no additional information regarding secondhand smoke. At a 6-month follow-up, researchers assessed whether or not families had adopted any smoking restrictions at home. The results are shown in the following table. (Source: Abdullah et al., "Secondhand smoke exposure reduction intervention in Chinese households of young children: A randomized controlled trial," Academic Pediatrics, vol. 15 (November- December 2015): \(588-598\), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. acap. \(2015.06 .008\) )$$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|} \hline & \text { Intervention } & \text { Control } \\ \hline \text { Smoking Restrictions } & 61 & 37 \\ \hline \text { No restrictions } & 37 & 45 \\ \hline \text { Total } & 98 & 82 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. What percentage of those receiving the intervention adopted smoking restrictions at home? b. What percentage of those in the control group adopted smoking restrictions at home? c. Based on this data, do you think the intervention may have been effective in promoting the adoption of smoking restrictions in the home?

Ear Infections Babies 6 to 23 months of age with inner ear infections were given antibiotics. The children were randomly assigned to receive antibiotics for a full 10 days or to receive antibiotics for 5 days and then a placebo for 5 days. There were 229 children assigned the shorter course, and 77 of them had "clinical failure" whereas of the 238 assigned to the longer course of antibiotics, 39 had clinical failure. (Source: Hoberman et al., "Shortened antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media in young children," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375 [December 2016]: \(2446-2456)\) a. Compare the percentage of clinical failure in each group and state which group did better. b. Create a two-way table with 10 days and 5 days across the top and failure and success down the left side. Fill in all four numbers. c. Was this an observational study or a controlled experiment? How do you know? d. Can you conclude that the treatment caused the difference? Why or why not?

In a 2017 study designed to investigate the effects of exercise on secondlanguage learning, 40 subjects were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: an experimental group that engaged in simultaneous physical activity while learning vocabulary in a second language and a control group that learned the vocabulary in a static learning environment. Researchers found that learning second-language vocabulary while engaged in physical activity led to higher performance than learning in a static environment. (Source: Liu et al., "It takes biking to learn: Physical activity improves learning a second language," PLoS One, May 18,2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0177624) a. What features of a well-designed controlled experiment does this study have? Which features are missing? b. Assuming that the study was properly conducted, can we conclude that the physical activity while learning caused the higher performance in learning second-language vocabulary? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.