/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 28 Antiretrovirals to Prevent HIV A... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Antiretrovirals to Prevent HIV A study conducted in Uganda and Kenya looked at heterosexual couples in which one of the partners was HIV-positive and the other was not. The person in each couple who was not HIV-positive was randomly assigned to one of three study regimens: tenofovir (TDF), combination tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF-FTC), or placebo and was followed for up to 36 months. Seventeen of the 1584 people assigned to TDF became positive for HIV, as did 13 of the 1579 assigned to TDFFTC and 52 of the 1584 assigned to the placebo. a. Find the percentage in cach group in the sample that became HIV positive, and compare these percentages. b. Create a two-way table with the treatment labels across the top. c. Test the hypothesis that treatment and HIV status are associated using a significance level of \(0.05\). (Source: J. Baelen et al. 2012. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. New England Journal of Medicine \(367,399-410\), August.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The percentage of HIV positive individuals are 1.07% for TDF, 0.82% for TDF-FTC and 3.28% for Placebo respectively. b. The two-way table has been created. c. The hypothesis test to check the association between treatment and HIV status should be conducted using Chi-square test of independence with a significance level of \(0.05\). The exact results depend on the specific statistical software or calculator being used.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Percentages

To find the percentage in each group that became HIV positive, the number of individuals who became positive in each group should be divided by the total number of individuals in the respective group and then multiplied by 100.\n\nFor TDF: \(\frac{17}{1584} * 100 = 1.07%\)\nFor TDF-FTC: \(\frac{13}{1579} * 100 = 0.82%\)\nFor Placebo: \(\frac{52}{1584} * 100 = 3.28%.\)
02

Create a Two-Way Table

The two-way table should present the treatment labels across the top and corresponding data beneath each treatment.\n\n| | TDF | TDF-FTC | Placebo |\n|-----------|-----|---------|---------|\n| HIV + | 17 | 13 | 52 |\n| Total |1584 | 1579 | 1584 |
03

Test for Association

A Chi-square test for independence is usually conducted to test for an association between two nominal variables using count data. Use Chi-square test of independence with a significance level of \(0.05\). The hypothesis statements are as follows:\nH0 (null hypothesis) is: Treatment and HIV status are not associated.\nHa (alternative hypothesis): Treatment and HIV status are associated. The chi-square test statistic, p-value and whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis are needed to provide a conclusion.\n\nNOTE: The calculated chi-square test statistic and the p-value will depend on the exact chi-square distribution used and thus can't be calculated without additional information or software.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-square Test
The Chi-square test is a fundamental statistical test used to determine whether there is a significant association between two categorical variables. In this context, we are interested in understanding whether the type of antiretroviral treatment is associated with HIV status.
Here’s how it works:
  • The test evaluates the observed frequencies in each category against the frequencies that we would expect under the null hypothesis.
  • In this scenario, the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) states that there is no association between treatment regimen and HIV status, implying that any differences in infection rates arise due to chance.
  • The alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)) claims that there's an association, suggesting that the treatment regimen does affect HIV status.
Once the data is collected, we calculate the test statistic:
  • The higher the chi-square statistic, the more unlikely it is that the observed deviations are due to random chance.
  • A significance level, typically set at 0.05, is used to decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
  • If the p-value, derived from the chi-square statistic, is lower than this threshold, we reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant association.
HIV Research
HIV research is vital in the ongoing effort to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS. This particular study aims to explore the effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens in preventing the transmission of HIV in serodiscordant heterosexual couples (where one partner is HIV-positive and the other isn’t).
The motivation behind such studies includes:
  • Reducing the incidence of HIV infections by finding effective preventative measures.
  • Enhancing the quality of life for individuals at risk of contracting HIV.
  • Informing public health policy and prioritizing the distribution of preventive treatments in resource-limited settings.
In the study, three groups were administered different regimens:
  • Tenofovir (TDF)
  • Combination of Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (TDF-FTC)
  • Placebo (no active drug)
By examining the rates of new HIV infections in these groups, researchers aim to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these regimens. The outcome not only helps in prevention strategies but also informs further pharmaceutical research and development.
Data Analysis
Data analysis is at the heart of research in studies like this one, involving antiretrovirals for preventing HIV. The steps of analysis include:
  • Calculation of infection rates: Determining the percentage of individuals in each group who contracted HIV helps reveal the effectiveness of the treatments. As seen, TDF had an infection rate of 1.07%, TDF-FTC at 0.82%, and placebo at 3.28%.
  • Creating tables for clarity: A two-way table helps organize the data, with treatment types and corresponding outcomes laid out clearly, enhancing readability and understanding.
  • Statistical testing: Using tools like the Chi-square test, data analysis helps to assess whether the observed differences in outcomes are statistically significant.
The insights drawn from these analyses enable researchers to make informed conclusions about the treatment regimens' efficacy.
This data-driven approach ensures the validity of research findings, helping develop evidence-based interventions and policies in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Steroids and Height Does the use of inhaled steroids by children affect their height as adults? Excerpts from the abstract of a study about this are given. Read them and then answer the questions that follow. "Methods: We measured adult height in 943 of 1041 participants \((90.6 \%)\) in the Childhood Asthma Management Program; adult height was determined at a mean ( \(\pm \mathrm{SD}\) ) age of \(24.9 \pm 2.7\) years. Starting at the age of 5 to 13 years, the participants had been randomly assigned to receive \(400 \mu \mathrm{g}\) of budesonide, 16 \(\mathrm{mg}\) of nedocromil, or placebo daily for 4 to 6 years. Results: Mean adult height was \(1.2 \overline{\mathrm{cm}}\) lower \((95 \%\) confidence interval \([\mathrm{CI}],-1.9\) to \(-0.5\) ) in the budesonide group than in the placebo group \((\mathrm{P}=0.001)\) and was \(0.2 \mathrm{~cm}\) lower (95\% CI, \(-0.9\) to \(0.5\) ) in the nedocromil group than in the placebo group \((\mathrm{P}=0.61) . "\) a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. Does the first interval, \((-1.9\) to \(-0.5\) ), capture 0 ? What does that show? d. From the interval, can you conclude that the use of budesonide in childhood reduces the heights of the children when they become adults? Why or why not? e. Does the second interval, \((-0.9\) to \(0.5\) ), capture 0 ? What does that show? f. From the interval, can you conclude that the use of nedocromil in childhood reduces the heights of the children when they become adults? Why or why not?

Design with Calcium Refer to Exercise \(10.42 .\) How could you find out whether calcium caused the lower death rates associated in this study with its use? Describe the design of a study assuming you had 300 women to work with. Assume that you do. not have to study the women for 19 years but, rather, will look at them for a much shorter time period, such as one or two years.

Effects of Parental Education on Boys' Education (Example 1) A study done by the IZA Journal of Labour Economics in the United Kingdom in 2013 compared 15 -year-old boys who are either attending school or have dropped out, in order to understand the impact of parental education on them. The table shows the relationship between boys' education and parental education. \(\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Educated Parents } & \text { Uneducated Parents } \\ \text { Studying } & 42 & 23 \\ \text { Not Studying } & 14 & 8\end{array}\) a. Find the row, column, and grand totals, and prepare a table showing these values as well as the counts given. b. Find the percentage of boys who are studying. c. Find the expected number of boys having educated parents who would study, if the variables are independent. Multiply the proportion overall that were studying times the number of boys having educated parents. Do not round off to a whole number. Round to two decimal digits. d. Find the other expected counts using your knowledge so that the expected counts must add to the row and column totals. Report them in a table with the same orientation as the one given for the data.

Oil Leaders The table shows the world's five largest crude oil producing countries and their total oil output in percentage for the years 2011 and 2012 (www.whichcountry.co). Give two reasons why you should not do a chi-square test with these data.

Tests a. In Chapter 8 , you learned some tests of proportions. Are tests of proportions used for categorical or numerical data? b. In this chapter, you are learning to use chi-square tests. Do these tests apply to categorical or numerical data?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.