/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Tests a. In Chapter 8 , you le... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Tests a. In Chapter 8 , you learned some tests of proportions. Are tests of proportions used for categorical or numerical data? b. In this chapter, you are learning to use chi-square tests. Do these tests apply to categorical or numerical data?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Tests of proportions are used for categorical data. \n b. Chi-square tests also apply to categorical data.

Step by step solution

01

Understand tests of proportions

Tests of proportions are a type of statistical analysis used for comparing proportions between different groups. They are suitable and designed to deal with categorical data, where the data represent the number of occurrences of particular types or categories.
02

Understand chi-square tests

Chi-square tests are also a type of statistical analysis. They are often used to test hypotheses about the distribution of observations in different categories. Similarly to tests of proportions, chi-square tests are also applied to categorical data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-square Tests
Chi-square tests are a powerful tool in statistical analysis to determine if there is a significant association between categorical variables. They examine the differences between observed and expected frequencies in categories, providing a way to ascertain whether those differences can be considered statistically significant. The chi-square test calculates a statistic that follows a chi-square distribution under the null hypothesis. This is typically expressed in the formula: \[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i},\]where \( O_i \) represents the observed frequency and \( E_i \) is the expected frequency for each category. Chi-square tests are especially useful in cases where you want to know if two categorical variables are independent or if two or more distributions can be deemed similar. Common uses include analyzing data from surveys and experiments to see if observed frequencies align with expected ones under the assumption of statistical independence.
Categorical Data
Categorical data is a type of data that is divided into groups or categories, where each value belongs to a distinct category. Unlike numerical data, categorical data cannot be ordered or measured, as it represents qualitative rather than quantitative attributes. Examples can include data such as gender, race, yes/no responses, or types of animals. When dealing with categorical data, statistical methods like chi-square tests and proportions tests become essential. These methods allow us to analyze patterns and differences within categories, enabling us to understand relationships and test hypotheses based on categorical variables. Understanding how to manage and analyze this type of data is critical, as many real-world datasets are inherently categorical by nature.
Proportions Tests
Proportions tests are statistical methods used to decide if there is a significant difference between the proportions of successes in two or more groups. They are particularly valuable when we need to analyze data that are categorical. These tests help us compare the proportional data, such as the percentage of users who prefer one product over another. One common example of a proportions test is the z-test for comparing two population proportions. The formula is expressed as:\[z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2})}},\]where \( \hat{p}_1 \) and \( \hat{p}_2 \) are the sample proportions, \( \hat{p} \) is the pooled sample proportion, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes.These tests allow researchers to determine if observed differences in proportions are statistically significant or simply due to random variation in sampling.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Autism and MMR Vaccine An article in the British medical journal Lancet claimed that autism was caused by the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. This vaccine is typically given to children twice, at about the age of 1 and again at about 4 years of age. The article reports a study of 12 children with autism who had all received the vaccines shortly before developing autism. The article was later retracted by Lancet because the conclusions were not justified by the design of the study. Explain why Lancet might have felt that the conclusions were not justified by listing potential flaws in the study, as described above. (Source: A. J. Wakefield et al. 1998. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet \(351,637-641 .\) )

School Dropout Rates The school dropout rate in an Indian village is about \(25 \%\), which means that \(25 \%\) of the students leave school without completing their education. There have been many attempts to reduce this rate. One of these attempts is to encourage students to restart education through incentives like midday meals and financial assistance. Suppose you want to determine whether the encouragement methods actually help in reducing the dropout rate. Suppose that students who are aided with incentives are observed for a year to see whether they drop out. a. Describe a study based on a sample of students that would allow the management to conclude that encouragement causes a reduction in dropout rate but would not allow it to generalize this result to students in all villages. b. Describe a study based on a sample of students that does not allow the management to conclude that encouragement causes a reduction in dropout rate but does allow it to generalize to students in all villages. c. Describe a study based on a sample of students that allows the management to conclude that encouragement causes a reduction in the dropout rate and also allows it to generalize to students in all villages.

Hospital Rooms When patients are admitted to hospitals, they are sometimes assigned to a single room with one bed and sometimes assigned to a double room, with a roommate. (Some insurance companies will pay only for the less expensive, double rooms.) A researcher was interested in the effect of the type of room on the length of stay in the hospital. Assume that we are not dealing with health issues that require single rooms. Suppose that upon admission to the hospital, the names of patients who would have been assigned a double room were put onto a list and a systematic random sample was taken; every tenth patient who would have been assigned to a double room was part of the experiment. For each participant, a coin was flipped: If it landed heads up, she or he got a double room, and if it landed tails up, a single room. Then the experimenters observed how many days the patients stayed in the hospital and compared the two groups. The experiment ran for two months. Suppose those who stayed in single rooms stayed (on average) one less day, and suppose the difference was significant. a. Can you generalize to others from this experiment? If so, to whom can you generalize, and why can you do it? b. Can you infer causality from this study? Why or why not?

Drug for Asthma (Example 8) Eosinophils are a form of white blood cell that is often present in people suffering from allergies. People with asthma and high levels of eosinophils who used steroid inhalers were given either a new drug or a placebo. Read extracts from the abstract of this study that appear below, and then evaluate the study. See page 539 for questions and guidance. "Methods: We enrolled patients with persistent, moderate-tosevere asthma and a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells per microliter ... who used medium-dose to high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids.... We administered dupilumab \((300 \mathrm{mg})\) or placebo subcutaneously once weekly. The primary end point was the occurrence of an asthma exacerbation [worsening]. Results: A total of 52 patients were [randomly] assigned to the dupilumab group, and 52 patients were [randomly] assigned to the placebo group..... Three patients had an asthma exacerbation with dupilumab \((6 \%)\) versus 23 with placebo \((44 \%)\), corresponding to an \(87 \%\) reduction with dupilumab (odds ratio, \(0.08 ; 95 \%\) confidence interval, \(0.02\) to \(0.28 ; \mathrm{P}<0.001)\). Conclusions: In patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and elevated eosinophil levels who used inhaled glucocorticoids and LABAs, dupilumab therapy, as compared with placebo, was associated with fewer asthma exacerbations [worsenings]."

One treatment for multiple myeloma (cancer of the blood and bones) is a stem cell transplant. However, in some cases the cancer returns. McCarthy and colleagues reported on a study that randomly assigned 460 patients ( 100 days after a stem cell transplant) to receive either lenalidomide or placebo. At one point in the study, 46 of the patients who received the real drug had a bad result (had progressive disease or had died), compared to 101 of those who received the placebo. Assume that exactly half were assigned to each group. a. Find and compare the percentages that had a bad result for the two groups. b. Test the hypothesis that the drug reduced the chance of a bad result compared to the placebo using a significance level of \(0.05\). c. The study started in April 2005 and was "unblinded" in 2009 when an interim analysis showed better results with the group taking the drug. After the unblinding, many of the patients from the placebo group "crossed over" to the drug group. Explain what you think "unblinding" means and why this seems like a reasonable thing to do. (Source: P. L. McCarthy et al. 2012. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine 366, 1770-1781.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.